Cargando…

The SCRIPT trial: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a polygenic risk score to tailor colorectal cancer screening in primary care

BACKGROUND: Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) can predict the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and target screening more precisely than current guidelines using age and family history alone. Primary care, as a far-reaching point of healthcare and routine provider of cancer screening and risk information,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saya, Sibel, Boyd, Lucy, Chondros, Patty, McNamara, Mairead, King, Michelle, Milton, Shakira, Lourenco, Richard De Abreu, Clark, Malcolm, Fishman, George, Marker, Julie, Ostroff, Cheri, Allman, Richard, Walter, Fiona M., Buchanan, Daniel, Winship, Ingrid, McIntosh, Jennifer, Macrae, Finlay, Jenkins, Mark, Emery, Jon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9513012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36163034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06734-7
_version_ 1784797959643201536
author Saya, Sibel
Boyd, Lucy
Chondros, Patty
McNamara, Mairead
King, Michelle
Milton, Shakira
Lourenco, Richard De Abreu
Clark, Malcolm
Fishman, George
Marker, Julie
Ostroff, Cheri
Allman, Richard
Walter, Fiona M.
Buchanan, Daniel
Winship, Ingrid
McIntosh, Jennifer
Macrae, Finlay
Jenkins, Mark
Emery, Jon
author_facet Saya, Sibel
Boyd, Lucy
Chondros, Patty
McNamara, Mairead
King, Michelle
Milton, Shakira
Lourenco, Richard De Abreu
Clark, Malcolm
Fishman, George
Marker, Julie
Ostroff, Cheri
Allman, Richard
Walter, Fiona M.
Buchanan, Daniel
Winship, Ingrid
McIntosh, Jennifer
Macrae, Finlay
Jenkins, Mark
Emery, Jon
author_sort Saya, Sibel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) can predict the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and target screening more precisely than current guidelines using age and family history alone. Primary care, as a far-reaching point of healthcare and routine provider of cancer screening and risk information, may be an ideal location for their widespread implementation. METHODS: This trial aims to determine whether the SCRIPT intervention results in more risk-appropriate CRC screening after 12 months in individuals attending general practice, compared with standard cancer risk reduction information. The SCRIPT intervention consists of a CRC PRS, tailored risk-specific screening recommendations and a risk report for participants and their GP, delivered in general practice. Patients aged between 45 and 70 inclusive, attending their GP, will be approached for participation. For those over 50, only those overdue for CRC screening will be eligible to participate. Two hundred and seventy-four participants will be randomised to the intervention or control arms, stratified by general practice, using a computer-generated allocation sequence. The primary outcome is risk-appropriate CRC screening after 12 months. For those in the intervention arm, risk-appropriate screening is defined using PRS-derived risk; for those in the control arm, it is defined using family history and national screening guidelines. Timing, type and results of the previous screening are considered in both arms. Objective health service data will capture screening behaviour. Secondary outcomes include cancer-specific worry, risk perception, predictors of CRC screening behaviour, screening intentions and health service use at 1, 6 and 12 months post-intervention delivery. DISCUSSION: This trial aims to determine whether a PRS-derived personalised CRC risk estimate delivered in primary care increases risk-appropriate CRC screening. A future population risk-stratified CRC screening programme could incorporate risk assessment within primary care while encouraging adherence to targeted screening recommendations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12621000092897p. Registered on 1 February 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06734-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9513012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95130122022-09-27 The SCRIPT trial: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a polygenic risk score to tailor colorectal cancer screening in primary care Saya, Sibel Boyd, Lucy Chondros, Patty McNamara, Mairead King, Michelle Milton, Shakira Lourenco, Richard De Abreu Clark, Malcolm Fishman, George Marker, Julie Ostroff, Cheri Allman, Richard Walter, Fiona M. Buchanan, Daniel Winship, Ingrid McIntosh, Jennifer Macrae, Finlay Jenkins, Mark Emery, Jon Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) can predict the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and target screening more precisely than current guidelines using age and family history alone. Primary care, as a far-reaching point of healthcare and routine provider of cancer screening and risk information, may be an ideal location for their widespread implementation. METHODS: This trial aims to determine whether the SCRIPT intervention results in more risk-appropriate CRC screening after 12 months in individuals attending general practice, compared with standard cancer risk reduction information. The SCRIPT intervention consists of a CRC PRS, tailored risk-specific screening recommendations and a risk report for participants and their GP, delivered in general practice. Patients aged between 45 and 70 inclusive, attending their GP, will be approached for participation. For those over 50, only those overdue for CRC screening will be eligible to participate. Two hundred and seventy-four participants will be randomised to the intervention or control arms, stratified by general practice, using a computer-generated allocation sequence. The primary outcome is risk-appropriate CRC screening after 12 months. For those in the intervention arm, risk-appropriate screening is defined using PRS-derived risk; for those in the control arm, it is defined using family history and national screening guidelines. Timing, type and results of the previous screening are considered in both arms. Objective health service data will capture screening behaviour. Secondary outcomes include cancer-specific worry, risk perception, predictors of CRC screening behaviour, screening intentions and health service use at 1, 6 and 12 months post-intervention delivery. DISCUSSION: This trial aims to determine whether a PRS-derived personalised CRC risk estimate delivered in primary care increases risk-appropriate CRC screening. A future population risk-stratified CRC screening programme could incorporate risk assessment within primary care while encouraging adherence to targeted screening recommendations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12621000092897p. Registered on 1 February 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06734-7. BioMed Central 2022-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9513012/ /pubmed/36163034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06734-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Saya, Sibel
Boyd, Lucy
Chondros, Patty
McNamara, Mairead
King, Michelle
Milton, Shakira
Lourenco, Richard De Abreu
Clark, Malcolm
Fishman, George
Marker, Julie
Ostroff, Cheri
Allman, Richard
Walter, Fiona M.
Buchanan, Daniel
Winship, Ingrid
McIntosh, Jennifer
Macrae, Finlay
Jenkins, Mark
Emery, Jon
The SCRIPT trial: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a polygenic risk score to tailor colorectal cancer screening in primary care
title The SCRIPT trial: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a polygenic risk score to tailor colorectal cancer screening in primary care
title_full The SCRIPT trial: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a polygenic risk score to tailor colorectal cancer screening in primary care
title_fullStr The SCRIPT trial: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a polygenic risk score to tailor colorectal cancer screening in primary care
title_full_unstemmed The SCRIPT trial: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a polygenic risk score to tailor colorectal cancer screening in primary care
title_short The SCRIPT trial: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a polygenic risk score to tailor colorectal cancer screening in primary care
title_sort script trial: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a polygenic risk score to tailor colorectal cancer screening in primary care
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9513012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36163034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06734-7
work_keys_str_mv AT sayasibel thescripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT boydlucy thescripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT chondrospatty thescripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT mcnamaramairead thescripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT kingmichelle thescripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT miltonshakira thescripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT lourencoricharddeabreu thescripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT clarkmalcolm thescripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT fishmangeorge thescripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT markerjulie thescripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT ostroffcheri thescripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT allmanrichard thescripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT walterfionam thescripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT buchanandaniel thescripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT winshipingrid thescripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT mcintoshjennifer thescripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT macraefinlay thescripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT jenkinsmark thescripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT emeryjon thescripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT sayasibel scripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT boydlucy scripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT chondrospatty scripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT mcnamaramairead scripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT kingmichelle scripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT miltonshakira scripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT lourencoricharddeabreu scripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT clarkmalcolm scripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT fishmangeorge scripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT markerjulie scripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT ostroffcheri scripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT allmanrichard scripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT walterfionam scripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT buchanandaniel scripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT winshipingrid scripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT mcintoshjennifer scripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT macraefinlay scripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT jenkinsmark scripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare
AT emeryjon scripttrialstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapolygenicriskscoretotailorcolorectalcancerscreeninginprimarycare