Cargando…

Hazardous Attitudes: Physician Decision Making in Radiation Oncology

PURPOSE: The Federal Aviation Administration quantifies hazardous attitudes (HAs) among pilots using a scale. HAs have been linked to aviation risk. We assessed the influence of HAs and other factors in treatment decision making in radiation oncology (RO). METHODS AND MATERIALS: An anonymous survey...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saeed, Nadia A., Blakaj, Adriana, Kelly, Jacqueline R., Decker, Roy H., Ford, Eric C., Brown, Derek W., Dosoretz, Arie P., Evans, Suzanne B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9513093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36177486
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101033
_version_ 1784797979568242688
author Saeed, Nadia A.
Blakaj, Adriana
Kelly, Jacqueline R.
Decker, Roy H.
Ford, Eric C.
Brown, Derek W.
Dosoretz, Arie P.
Evans, Suzanne B.
author_facet Saeed, Nadia A.
Blakaj, Adriana
Kelly, Jacqueline R.
Decker, Roy H.
Ford, Eric C.
Brown, Derek W.
Dosoretz, Arie P.
Evans, Suzanne B.
author_sort Saeed, Nadia A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The Federal Aviation Administration quantifies hazardous attitudes (HAs) among pilots using a scale. HAs have been linked to aviation risk. We assessed the influence of HAs and other factors in treatment decision making in radiation oncology (RO). METHODS AND MATERIALS: An anonymous survey was sent to 809 radiation oncologists in US cities housing the top 25 cancer centers. The survey included an HA scale adapted for RO and presented 9 cases assessing risk-tolerant radiation therapy prescribing habits and compliance with the American Society for Radiation Oncology's Choosing Wisely recommendations. Demographic and treatment decision data were dichotomized to identify factors associated with prescribing habits using univariable and multivariable (MVA) logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 139 responses (17.1%) were received, and 103 were eligible for analysis. Among respondents, 40% were female, ages were evenly distributed, and 83% were in academics. Median scores for all attitudes (macho, anti-authority, worry, resignation, and impulsivity) were below the aviation thresholds for hazard and data from surgical specialties. On MVA, responders >50 years old with >5 years’ experience were 4.45 times more likely to recommend risk-tolerant radiation (P = .016). Macho attitude was negatively associated with Choosing Wisely compliant treatments (odds ratio [OR], 0.12; P = .001). Physicians who reported having previously retreated the supraclavicular fossa without complication were more likely to recommend retreatment in medically unfit patients if they felt the complication was avoided owing to careful planning (OR, 5.2; P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this represents the first study analyzing physician attitudes in RO and their effect on self-reported treatment decisions. This work suggests that attitude may be among the factors that influence risk-tolerant prescribing practices and compliance with Choosing Wisely recommendations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9513093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95130932022-09-28 Hazardous Attitudes: Physician Decision Making in Radiation Oncology Saeed, Nadia A. Blakaj, Adriana Kelly, Jacqueline R. Decker, Roy H. Ford, Eric C. Brown, Derek W. Dosoretz, Arie P. Evans, Suzanne B. Adv Radiat Oncol Research Letter PURPOSE: The Federal Aviation Administration quantifies hazardous attitudes (HAs) among pilots using a scale. HAs have been linked to aviation risk. We assessed the influence of HAs and other factors in treatment decision making in radiation oncology (RO). METHODS AND MATERIALS: An anonymous survey was sent to 809 radiation oncologists in US cities housing the top 25 cancer centers. The survey included an HA scale adapted for RO and presented 9 cases assessing risk-tolerant radiation therapy prescribing habits and compliance with the American Society for Radiation Oncology's Choosing Wisely recommendations. Demographic and treatment decision data were dichotomized to identify factors associated with prescribing habits using univariable and multivariable (MVA) logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 139 responses (17.1%) were received, and 103 were eligible for analysis. Among respondents, 40% were female, ages were evenly distributed, and 83% were in academics. Median scores for all attitudes (macho, anti-authority, worry, resignation, and impulsivity) were below the aviation thresholds for hazard and data from surgical specialties. On MVA, responders >50 years old with >5 years’ experience were 4.45 times more likely to recommend risk-tolerant radiation (P = .016). Macho attitude was negatively associated with Choosing Wisely compliant treatments (odds ratio [OR], 0.12; P = .001). Physicians who reported having previously retreated the supraclavicular fossa without complication were more likely to recommend retreatment in medically unfit patients if they felt the complication was avoided owing to careful planning (OR, 5.2; P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this represents the first study analyzing physician attitudes in RO and their effect on self-reported treatment decisions. This work suggests that attitude may be among the factors that influence risk-tolerant prescribing practices and compliance with Choosing Wisely recommendations. Elsevier 2022-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9513093/ /pubmed/36177486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101033 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Letter
Saeed, Nadia A.
Blakaj, Adriana
Kelly, Jacqueline R.
Decker, Roy H.
Ford, Eric C.
Brown, Derek W.
Dosoretz, Arie P.
Evans, Suzanne B.
Hazardous Attitudes: Physician Decision Making in Radiation Oncology
title Hazardous Attitudes: Physician Decision Making in Radiation Oncology
title_full Hazardous Attitudes: Physician Decision Making in Radiation Oncology
title_fullStr Hazardous Attitudes: Physician Decision Making in Radiation Oncology
title_full_unstemmed Hazardous Attitudes: Physician Decision Making in Radiation Oncology
title_short Hazardous Attitudes: Physician Decision Making in Radiation Oncology
title_sort hazardous attitudes: physician decision making in radiation oncology
topic Research Letter
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9513093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36177486
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101033
work_keys_str_mv AT saeednadiaa hazardousattitudesphysiciandecisionmakinginradiationoncology
AT blakajadriana hazardousattitudesphysiciandecisionmakinginradiationoncology
AT kellyjacqueliner hazardousattitudesphysiciandecisionmakinginradiationoncology
AT deckerroyh hazardousattitudesphysiciandecisionmakinginradiationoncology
AT fordericc hazardousattitudesphysiciandecisionmakinginradiationoncology
AT brownderekw hazardousattitudesphysiciandecisionmakinginradiationoncology
AT dosoretzariep hazardousattitudesphysiciandecisionmakinginradiationoncology
AT evanssuzanneb hazardousattitudesphysiciandecisionmakinginradiationoncology