Cargando…
Efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of COVID-19 vaccines in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Older adults are more susceptible to severe health outcomes for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Universal vaccination has become a trend, but there are still doubts and research gaps regarding the COVID-19 vaccination in the elderly. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy, imm...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9513208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36177017 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.965971 |
_version_ | 1784798006901473280 |
---|---|
author | Li, Zejun Liu, Shouhuan Li, Fengming Li, Yifeng Li, Yilin Peng, Pu Li, Sai He, Li Liu, Tieqiao |
author_facet | Li, Zejun Liu, Shouhuan Li, Fengming Li, Yifeng Li, Yilin Peng, Pu Li, Sai He, Li Liu, Tieqiao |
author_sort | Li, Zejun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Older adults are more susceptible to severe health outcomes for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Universal vaccination has become a trend, but there are still doubts and research gaps regarding the COVID-19 vaccination in the elderly. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of COVID-19 vaccines in older people aged ≥ 55 years and their influencing factors. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials from inception to April 9, 2022, were systematically searched in PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. We estimated summary relative risk (RR), rates, or standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using random-effects meta-analysis. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022314456). RESULTS: Of the 32 eligible studies, 9, 21, and 25 were analyzed for efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety, respectively. In older adults, vaccination was efficacious against COVID-19 (79.49%, 95% CI: 60.55−89.34), with excellent seroconversion rate (92.64%, 95% CI: 86.77−96.91) and geometric mean titer (GMT) (SMD 3.56, 95% CI: 2.80−4.31) of neutralizing antibodies, and provided a significant protection rate against severe disease (87.01%, 50.80−96.57). Subgroup and meta-regression analyses consistently found vaccine types and the number of doses to be primary influencing factors for efficacy and immunogenicity. Specifically, mRNA vaccines showed the best efficacy (90.72%, 95% CI: 86.82−93.46), consistent with its highest seroconversion rate (98.52%, 95% CI: 93.45−99.98) and GMT (SMD 6.20, 95% CI: 2.02−10.39). Compared to the control groups, vaccination significantly increased the incidence of total adverse events (AEs) (RR 1.59, 95% CI: 1.38−1.83), including most local and systemic AEs, such as pain, fever, chill, etc. For inactivated and DNA vaccines, the incidence of any AEs was similar between vaccination and control groups (p > 0.1), while mRNA vaccines had the highest risk of most AEs (RR range from 1.74 to 7.22). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 vaccines showed acceptable efficacy, immunogenicity and safety in older people, especially providing a high protection rate against severe disease. The mRNA vaccine was the most efficacious, but it is worth surveillance for some AEs it caused. Increased booster coverage in older adults is warranted, and additional studies are urgently required for longer follow-up periods and variant strains. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9513208 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95132082022-09-28 Efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of COVID-19 vaccines in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis Li, Zejun Liu, Shouhuan Li, Fengming Li, Yifeng Li, Yilin Peng, Pu Li, Sai He, Li Liu, Tieqiao Front Immunol Immunology BACKGROUND: Older adults are more susceptible to severe health outcomes for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Universal vaccination has become a trend, but there are still doubts and research gaps regarding the COVID-19 vaccination in the elderly. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of COVID-19 vaccines in older people aged ≥ 55 years and their influencing factors. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials from inception to April 9, 2022, were systematically searched in PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. We estimated summary relative risk (RR), rates, or standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using random-effects meta-analysis. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022314456). RESULTS: Of the 32 eligible studies, 9, 21, and 25 were analyzed for efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety, respectively. In older adults, vaccination was efficacious against COVID-19 (79.49%, 95% CI: 60.55−89.34), with excellent seroconversion rate (92.64%, 95% CI: 86.77−96.91) and geometric mean titer (GMT) (SMD 3.56, 95% CI: 2.80−4.31) of neutralizing antibodies, and provided a significant protection rate against severe disease (87.01%, 50.80−96.57). Subgroup and meta-regression analyses consistently found vaccine types and the number of doses to be primary influencing factors for efficacy and immunogenicity. Specifically, mRNA vaccines showed the best efficacy (90.72%, 95% CI: 86.82−93.46), consistent with its highest seroconversion rate (98.52%, 95% CI: 93.45−99.98) and GMT (SMD 6.20, 95% CI: 2.02−10.39). Compared to the control groups, vaccination significantly increased the incidence of total adverse events (AEs) (RR 1.59, 95% CI: 1.38−1.83), including most local and systemic AEs, such as pain, fever, chill, etc. For inactivated and DNA vaccines, the incidence of any AEs was similar between vaccination and control groups (p > 0.1), while mRNA vaccines had the highest risk of most AEs (RR range from 1.74 to 7.22). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 vaccines showed acceptable efficacy, immunogenicity and safety in older people, especially providing a high protection rate against severe disease. The mRNA vaccine was the most efficacious, but it is worth surveillance for some AEs it caused. Increased booster coverage in older adults is warranted, and additional studies are urgently required for longer follow-up periods and variant strains. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9513208/ /pubmed/36177017 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.965971 Text en Copyright © 2022 Li, Liu, Li, Li, Li, Peng, Li, He and Liu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Immunology Li, Zejun Liu, Shouhuan Li, Fengming Li, Yifeng Li, Yilin Peng, Pu Li, Sai He, Li Liu, Tieqiao Efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of COVID-19 vaccines in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of COVID-19 vaccines in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of COVID-19 vaccines in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of COVID-19 vaccines in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of COVID-19 vaccines in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of COVID-19 vaccines in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of covid-19 vaccines in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Immunology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9513208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36177017 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.965971 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lizejun efficacyimmunogenicityandsafetyofcovid19vaccinesinolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liushouhuan efficacyimmunogenicityandsafetyofcovid19vaccinesinolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lifengming efficacyimmunogenicityandsafetyofcovid19vaccinesinolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liyifeng efficacyimmunogenicityandsafetyofcovid19vaccinesinolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liyilin efficacyimmunogenicityandsafetyofcovid19vaccinesinolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pengpu efficacyimmunogenicityandsafetyofcovid19vaccinesinolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lisai efficacyimmunogenicityandsafetyofcovid19vaccinesinolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT heli efficacyimmunogenicityandsafetyofcovid19vaccinesinolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liutieqiao efficacyimmunogenicityandsafetyofcovid19vaccinesinolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |