Cargando…
Interobserver Variability of Gross Tumor Volume Delineation for Colorectal Liver Metastases Using Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the interobserver variability in the contouring of the gross tumor volume (GTV) on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and computed tomography (CT) for colorectal liver metastases in the setting of SABR. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three expert radiation onc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9513217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36176355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101020 |
_version_ | 1784798009159057408 |
---|---|
author | Marshall, Cora Thirion, Pierre Mihai, Alina Armstrong, John G. Cournane, Seán Hickey, Darina McClean, Brendan Quinn, John |
author_facet | Marshall, Cora Thirion, Pierre Mihai, Alina Armstrong, John G. Cournane, Seán Hickey, Darina McClean, Brendan Quinn, John |
author_sort | Marshall, Cora |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the interobserver variability in the contouring of the gross tumor volume (GTV) on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and computed tomography (CT) for colorectal liver metastases in the setting of SABR. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three expert radiation oncologists contoured 10 GTV volumes on 3 MR imaging sequences and on the CT image data set. Three metrics were chosen to evaluate the interobserver variability: the conformity index, the DICE coefficient, and the maximum Hausdorff distance (HDmax). Statistical analysis of the results was performed using a 1-sided permutation test. RESULTS: For all 3 metrics, the MR liver acquisition volume acquisition (MR LAVA) showed the lowest interobserver variability. Analysis showed a significant difference (P < .01) in the mean DICE, an overlap metric, for MR LAVA (0.82) and CT (0.74). The HDmax that highlights boundary errors also showed a significant difference (P = .04) with MR LAVA having a lower mean HDmax (7.2 mm) compared with CT (5.7 mm). The mean HDmax for both MR single shot fast spin echo (SSFSE) (19.3 mm) and diffusion weighted image (9.5 mm) showed large interobserver variability with MR SSFSE having a mean HDmax of 19.3 mm. A volume comparison between MR LAVA and CT showed a significantly higher volume for small GTVs (<5 cm(3)) when using MR LAVA for contouring in comparison to CT. CONCLUSIONS: This study reported the lowest interobserver variability for the MR LAVA, thus indicating the benefit of using MR to complement CT when contouring GTV for colorectal liver metastases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9513217 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95132172022-09-28 Interobserver Variability of Gross Tumor Volume Delineation for Colorectal Liver Metastases Using Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Marshall, Cora Thirion, Pierre Mihai, Alina Armstrong, John G. Cournane, Seán Hickey, Darina McClean, Brendan Quinn, John Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the interobserver variability in the contouring of the gross tumor volume (GTV) on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and computed tomography (CT) for colorectal liver metastases in the setting of SABR. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three expert radiation oncologists contoured 10 GTV volumes on 3 MR imaging sequences and on the CT image data set. Three metrics were chosen to evaluate the interobserver variability: the conformity index, the DICE coefficient, and the maximum Hausdorff distance (HDmax). Statistical analysis of the results was performed using a 1-sided permutation test. RESULTS: For all 3 metrics, the MR liver acquisition volume acquisition (MR LAVA) showed the lowest interobserver variability. Analysis showed a significant difference (P < .01) in the mean DICE, an overlap metric, for MR LAVA (0.82) and CT (0.74). The HDmax that highlights boundary errors also showed a significant difference (P = .04) with MR LAVA having a lower mean HDmax (7.2 mm) compared with CT (5.7 mm). The mean HDmax for both MR single shot fast spin echo (SSFSE) (19.3 mm) and diffusion weighted image (9.5 mm) showed large interobserver variability with MR SSFSE having a mean HDmax of 19.3 mm. A volume comparison between MR LAVA and CT showed a significantly higher volume for small GTVs (<5 cm(3)) when using MR LAVA for contouring in comparison to CT. CONCLUSIONS: This study reported the lowest interobserver variability for the MR LAVA, thus indicating the benefit of using MR to complement CT when contouring GTV for colorectal liver metastases. Elsevier 2022-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9513217/ /pubmed/36176355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101020 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Scientific Article Marshall, Cora Thirion, Pierre Mihai, Alina Armstrong, John G. Cournane, Seán Hickey, Darina McClean, Brendan Quinn, John Interobserver Variability of Gross Tumor Volume Delineation for Colorectal Liver Metastases Using Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title | Interobserver Variability of Gross Tumor Volume Delineation for Colorectal Liver Metastases Using Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_full | Interobserver Variability of Gross Tumor Volume Delineation for Colorectal Liver Metastases Using Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_fullStr | Interobserver Variability of Gross Tumor Volume Delineation for Colorectal Liver Metastases Using Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Interobserver Variability of Gross Tumor Volume Delineation for Colorectal Liver Metastases Using Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_short | Interobserver Variability of Gross Tumor Volume Delineation for Colorectal Liver Metastases Using Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_sort | interobserver variability of gross tumor volume delineation for colorectal liver metastases using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging |
topic | Scientific Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9513217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36176355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marshallcora interobservervariabilityofgrosstumorvolumedelineationforcolorectallivermetastasesusingcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging AT thirionpierre interobservervariabilityofgrosstumorvolumedelineationforcolorectallivermetastasesusingcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging AT mihaialina interobservervariabilityofgrosstumorvolumedelineationforcolorectallivermetastasesusingcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging AT armstrongjohng interobservervariabilityofgrosstumorvolumedelineationforcolorectallivermetastasesusingcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging AT cournanesean interobservervariabilityofgrosstumorvolumedelineationforcolorectallivermetastasesusingcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging AT hickeydarina interobservervariabilityofgrosstumorvolumedelineationforcolorectallivermetastasesusingcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging AT mccleanbrendan interobservervariabilityofgrosstumorvolumedelineationforcolorectallivermetastasesusingcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging AT quinnjohn interobservervariabilityofgrosstumorvolumedelineationforcolorectallivermetastasesusingcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging |