Cargando…

Interobserver Variability of Gross Tumor Volume Delineation for Colorectal Liver Metastases Using Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the interobserver variability in the contouring of the gross tumor volume (GTV) on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and computed tomography (CT) for colorectal liver metastases in the setting of SABR. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three expert radiation onc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marshall, Cora, Thirion, Pierre, Mihai, Alina, Armstrong, John G., Cournane, Seán, Hickey, Darina, McClean, Brendan, Quinn, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9513217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36176355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101020
_version_ 1784798009159057408
author Marshall, Cora
Thirion, Pierre
Mihai, Alina
Armstrong, John G.
Cournane, Seán
Hickey, Darina
McClean, Brendan
Quinn, John
author_facet Marshall, Cora
Thirion, Pierre
Mihai, Alina
Armstrong, John G.
Cournane, Seán
Hickey, Darina
McClean, Brendan
Quinn, John
author_sort Marshall, Cora
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the interobserver variability in the contouring of the gross tumor volume (GTV) on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and computed tomography (CT) for colorectal liver metastases in the setting of SABR. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three expert radiation oncologists contoured 10 GTV volumes on 3 MR imaging sequences and on the CT image data set. Three metrics were chosen to evaluate the interobserver variability: the conformity index, the DICE coefficient, and the maximum Hausdorff distance (HDmax). Statistical analysis of the results was performed using a 1-sided permutation test. RESULTS: For all 3 metrics, the MR liver acquisition volume acquisition (MR LAVA) showed the lowest interobserver variability. Analysis showed a significant difference (P < .01) in the mean DICE, an overlap metric, for MR LAVA (0.82) and CT (0.74). The HDmax that highlights boundary errors also showed a significant difference (P = .04) with MR LAVA having a lower mean HDmax (7.2 mm) compared with CT (5.7 mm). The mean HDmax for both MR single shot fast spin echo (SSFSE) (19.3 mm) and diffusion weighted image (9.5 mm) showed large interobserver variability with MR SSFSE having a mean HDmax of 19.3 mm. A volume comparison between MR LAVA and CT showed a significantly higher volume for small GTVs (<5 cm(3)) when using MR LAVA for contouring in comparison to CT. CONCLUSIONS: This study reported the lowest interobserver variability for the MR LAVA, thus indicating the benefit of using MR to complement CT when contouring GTV for colorectal liver metastases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9513217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95132172022-09-28 Interobserver Variability of Gross Tumor Volume Delineation for Colorectal Liver Metastases Using Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Marshall, Cora Thirion, Pierre Mihai, Alina Armstrong, John G. Cournane, Seán Hickey, Darina McClean, Brendan Quinn, John Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the interobserver variability in the contouring of the gross tumor volume (GTV) on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and computed tomography (CT) for colorectal liver metastases in the setting of SABR. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three expert radiation oncologists contoured 10 GTV volumes on 3 MR imaging sequences and on the CT image data set. Three metrics were chosen to evaluate the interobserver variability: the conformity index, the DICE coefficient, and the maximum Hausdorff distance (HDmax). Statistical analysis of the results was performed using a 1-sided permutation test. RESULTS: For all 3 metrics, the MR liver acquisition volume acquisition (MR LAVA) showed the lowest interobserver variability. Analysis showed a significant difference (P < .01) in the mean DICE, an overlap metric, for MR LAVA (0.82) and CT (0.74). The HDmax that highlights boundary errors also showed a significant difference (P = .04) with MR LAVA having a lower mean HDmax (7.2 mm) compared with CT (5.7 mm). The mean HDmax for both MR single shot fast spin echo (SSFSE) (19.3 mm) and diffusion weighted image (9.5 mm) showed large interobserver variability with MR SSFSE having a mean HDmax of 19.3 mm. A volume comparison between MR LAVA and CT showed a significantly higher volume for small GTVs (<5 cm(3)) when using MR LAVA for contouring in comparison to CT. CONCLUSIONS: This study reported the lowest interobserver variability for the MR LAVA, thus indicating the benefit of using MR to complement CT when contouring GTV for colorectal liver metastases. Elsevier 2022-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9513217/ /pubmed/36176355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101020 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Scientific Article
Marshall, Cora
Thirion, Pierre
Mihai, Alina
Armstrong, John G.
Cournane, Seán
Hickey, Darina
McClean, Brendan
Quinn, John
Interobserver Variability of Gross Tumor Volume Delineation for Colorectal Liver Metastases Using Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title Interobserver Variability of Gross Tumor Volume Delineation for Colorectal Liver Metastases Using Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full Interobserver Variability of Gross Tumor Volume Delineation for Colorectal Liver Metastases Using Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_fullStr Interobserver Variability of Gross Tumor Volume Delineation for Colorectal Liver Metastases Using Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Interobserver Variability of Gross Tumor Volume Delineation for Colorectal Liver Metastases Using Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_short Interobserver Variability of Gross Tumor Volume Delineation for Colorectal Liver Metastases Using Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_sort interobserver variability of gross tumor volume delineation for colorectal liver metastases using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging
topic Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9513217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36176355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101020
work_keys_str_mv AT marshallcora interobservervariabilityofgrosstumorvolumedelineationforcolorectallivermetastasesusingcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT thirionpierre interobservervariabilityofgrosstumorvolumedelineationforcolorectallivermetastasesusingcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT mihaialina interobservervariabilityofgrosstumorvolumedelineationforcolorectallivermetastasesusingcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT armstrongjohng interobservervariabilityofgrosstumorvolumedelineationforcolorectallivermetastasesusingcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT cournanesean interobservervariabilityofgrosstumorvolumedelineationforcolorectallivermetastasesusingcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT hickeydarina interobservervariabilityofgrosstumorvolumedelineationforcolorectallivermetastasesusingcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT mccleanbrendan interobservervariabilityofgrosstumorvolumedelineationforcolorectallivermetastasesusingcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT quinnjohn interobservervariabilityofgrosstumorvolumedelineationforcolorectallivermetastasesusingcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging