Cargando…
Irish farmers’ interactions with regional veterinary laboratories- reasons, results, reactions: a survey
BACKGROUND: Animal health surveillance is important in ensuring optimal animal health and welfare. Monitoring of diagnostic submissions, including post-mortem examination of carcasses, at the Department of Agriculture Food and the Marine laboratories, provides the basis for this type of passive surv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9513898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36167621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13620-022-00225-6 |
_version_ | 1784798165675802624 |
---|---|
author | Kennedy, Aideen Hogan, Ian Froehlich, Rebecca McGettrick, Shane Sánchez-Miguel, Cosme Casey, Micheál Sheehan, Maresa |
author_facet | Kennedy, Aideen Hogan, Ian Froehlich, Rebecca McGettrick, Shane Sánchez-Miguel, Cosme Casey, Micheál Sheehan, Maresa |
author_sort | Kennedy, Aideen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Animal health surveillance is important in ensuring optimal animal health and welfare. Monitoring of diagnostic submissions, including post-mortem examination of carcasses, at the Department of Agriculture Food and the Marine laboratories, provides the basis for this type of passive surveillance in Ireland. The process requires engagement from veterinarians and farmers from all sectors of the agricultural spectrum. This study aims to identify the reasons why farmers engaged in dairy, beef, sheep, and mixed farming enterprises submit carcasses or not to the Regional Veterinary Laboratories. RESULTS: Surveys were distributed in hard copy format at Regional Veterinary Laboratories, and fifty Teagasc facilitated farmer discussion groups. There were 1179 responses collected in 54 locations. The top reasons participants submitted to the laboratories were 1) to guide treatment/ vaccination, 2) fear of a contagious disease, and 3) if their veterinarian advised them to. The top reasons for not submitting were 1) the vet making a diagnosis on the farm, 2) the distance from the laboratory, and 3) lack of time and labour. Implementation of vaccination protocols was the main change implemented based on results, followed by management changes and the use of different treatments, e.g., switching from antibiotic to parasite treatment. Sheep enterprises were more likely than dairy to choose distance and cost as a reason not to submit. Dairying enterprises were more likely than other enterprise types to submit if they feared a contagious or zoonotic disease. CONCLUSION: Positively, this survey shows the desire of participants to submit to the laboratories to guide treatment and vaccination protocols, potentially indicating that positive engagement between stakeholders and the RVLs will help promote optimal animal health and promote responsible antimicrobial use. Results also show the critical role of veterinarians in continued disease surveillance on farms. Maintaining engagement with all farming sectors will be essential in promoting successful animal health surveillance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9513898 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95138982022-09-28 Irish farmers’ interactions with regional veterinary laboratories- reasons, results, reactions: a survey Kennedy, Aideen Hogan, Ian Froehlich, Rebecca McGettrick, Shane Sánchez-Miguel, Cosme Casey, Micheál Sheehan, Maresa Ir Vet J Research BACKGROUND: Animal health surveillance is important in ensuring optimal animal health and welfare. Monitoring of diagnostic submissions, including post-mortem examination of carcasses, at the Department of Agriculture Food and the Marine laboratories, provides the basis for this type of passive surveillance in Ireland. The process requires engagement from veterinarians and farmers from all sectors of the agricultural spectrum. This study aims to identify the reasons why farmers engaged in dairy, beef, sheep, and mixed farming enterprises submit carcasses or not to the Regional Veterinary Laboratories. RESULTS: Surveys were distributed in hard copy format at Regional Veterinary Laboratories, and fifty Teagasc facilitated farmer discussion groups. There were 1179 responses collected in 54 locations. The top reasons participants submitted to the laboratories were 1) to guide treatment/ vaccination, 2) fear of a contagious disease, and 3) if their veterinarian advised them to. The top reasons for not submitting were 1) the vet making a diagnosis on the farm, 2) the distance from the laboratory, and 3) lack of time and labour. Implementation of vaccination protocols was the main change implemented based on results, followed by management changes and the use of different treatments, e.g., switching from antibiotic to parasite treatment. Sheep enterprises were more likely than dairy to choose distance and cost as a reason not to submit. Dairying enterprises were more likely than other enterprise types to submit if they feared a contagious or zoonotic disease. CONCLUSION: Positively, this survey shows the desire of participants to submit to the laboratories to guide treatment and vaccination protocols, potentially indicating that positive engagement between stakeholders and the RVLs will help promote optimal animal health and promote responsible antimicrobial use. Results also show the critical role of veterinarians in continued disease surveillance on farms. Maintaining engagement with all farming sectors will be essential in promoting successful animal health surveillance. BioMed Central 2022-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9513898/ /pubmed/36167621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13620-022-00225-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Kennedy, Aideen Hogan, Ian Froehlich, Rebecca McGettrick, Shane Sánchez-Miguel, Cosme Casey, Micheál Sheehan, Maresa Irish farmers’ interactions with regional veterinary laboratories- reasons, results, reactions: a survey |
title | Irish farmers’ interactions with regional veterinary laboratories- reasons, results, reactions: a survey |
title_full | Irish farmers’ interactions with regional veterinary laboratories- reasons, results, reactions: a survey |
title_fullStr | Irish farmers’ interactions with regional veterinary laboratories- reasons, results, reactions: a survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Irish farmers’ interactions with regional veterinary laboratories- reasons, results, reactions: a survey |
title_short | Irish farmers’ interactions with regional veterinary laboratories- reasons, results, reactions: a survey |
title_sort | irish farmers’ interactions with regional veterinary laboratories- reasons, results, reactions: a survey |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9513898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36167621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13620-022-00225-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kennedyaideen irishfarmersinteractionswithregionalveterinarylaboratoriesreasonsresultsreactionsasurvey AT hoganian irishfarmersinteractionswithregionalveterinarylaboratoriesreasonsresultsreactionsasurvey AT froehlichrebecca irishfarmersinteractionswithregionalveterinarylaboratoriesreasonsresultsreactionsasurvey AT mcgettrickshane irishfarmersinteractionswithregionalveterinarylaboratoriesreasonsresultsreactionsasurvey AT sanchezmiguelcosme irishfarmersinteractionswithregionalveterinarylaboratoriesreasonsresultsreactionsasurvey AT caseymicheal irishfarmersinteractionswithregionalveterinarylaboratoriesreasonsresultsreactionsasurvey AT sheehanmaresa irishfarmersinteractionswithregionalveterinarylaboratoriesreasonsresultsreactionsasurvey |