Cargando…
The use of ELISA is comparable to immunoprecipitation in the detection of selected myositis-specific autoantibodies in a European population
BACKGROUND: The reliable detection of myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSA) provides valuable clinical information regarding prognosis, clinical progression and diagnostic confirmation. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reliability of a commercial ELISA immunoassay in detecting myositis-specific autoanti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9514093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36177007 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.975939 |
_version_ | 1784798203977138176 |
---|---|
author | Loganathan, Aravinthan McMorrow, Fionnuala Lu, Hui Li, Danyang Mulhearn, Ben McHugh, Neil John Tansley, Sarah Louise |
author_facet | Loganathan, Aravinthan McMorrow, Fionnuala Lu, Hui Li, Danyang Mulhearn, Ben McHugh, Neil John Tansley, Sarah Louise |
author_sort | Loganathan, Aravinthan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The reliable detection of myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSA) provides valuable clinical information regarding prognosis, clinical progression and diagnostic confirmation. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reliability of a commercial ELISA immunoassay in detecting myositis-specific autoantibodies in comparison to immunoprecipitation as the reference standard. METHODS: Serum samples were chosen from a biobank of more than 3000 samples. Samples with a confirmed MSA on Immunoprecipitation (n=116) were evaluated in duplicate by ELISA to detect Mi2, MDA5, Jo1, EJ, KS, PL-7 and PL-12 (Medical & Biological Laboratories Co. Ltd, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan). Healthy control samples (n=246) confirmed autoantibody negative by immunoprecipitation were similarly assessed. RESULTS: There was a very good agreement between ELISA and immunoprecipitation for serum samples containing anti-Mi2, MDA5, Jo1, EJ, KS and PL-7 and PL-12 auto-antibodies. Cohen’s κ values ranged from 0.86-1 for the measured autoantibodies on ELISA. CONCLUSION: ELISA was an accurate method for detecting anti-synthetase, anti-Mi2 and anti-MDA5 autoantibodies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9514093 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95140932022-09-28 The use of ELISA is comparable to immunoprecipitation in the detection of selected myositis-specific autoantibodies in a European population Loganathan, Aravinthan McMorrow, Fionnuala Lu, Hui Li, Danyang Mulhearn, Ben McHugh, Neil John Tansley, Sarah Louise Front Immunol Immunology BACKGROUND: The reliable detection of myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSA) provides valuable clinical information regarding prognosis, clinical progression and diagnostic confirmation. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reliability of a commercial ELISA immunoassay in detecting myositis-specific autoantibodies in comparison to immunoprecipitation as the reference standard. METHODS: Serum samples were chosen from a biobank of more than 3000 samples. Samples with a confirmed MSA on Immunoprecipitation (n=116) were evaluated in duplicate by ELISA to detect Mi2, MDA5, Jo1, EJ, KS, PL-7 and PL-12 (Medical & Biological Laboratories Co. Ltd, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan). Healthy control samples (n=246) confirmed autoantibody negative by immunoprecipitation were similarly assessed. RESULTS: There was a very good agreement between ELISA and immunoprecipitation for serum samples containing anti-Mi2, MDA5, Jo1, EJ, KS and PL-7 and PL-12 auto-antibodies. Cohen’s κ values ranged from 0.86-1 for the measured autoantibodies on ELISA. CONCLUSION: ELISA was an accurate method for detecting anti-synthetase, anti-Mi2 and anti-MDA5 autoantibodies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9514093/ /pubmed/36177007 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.975939 Text en Copyright © 2022 Loganathan, McMorrow, Lu, Li, Mulhearn, McHugh and Tansley https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Immunology Loganathan, Aravinthan McMorrow, Fionnuala Lu, Hui Li, Danyang Mulhearn, Ben McHugh, Neil John Tansley, Sarah Louise The use of ELISA is comparable to immunoprecipitation in the detection of selected myositis-specific autoantibodies in a European population |
title | The use of ELISA is comparable to immunoprecipitation in the detection of selected myositis-specific autoantibodies in a European population |
title_full | The use of ELISA is comparable to immunoprecipitation in the detection of selected myositis-specific autoantibodies in a European population |
title_fullStr | The use of ELISA is comparable to immunoprecipitation in the detection of selected myositis-specific autoantibodies in a European population |
title_full_unstemmed | The use of ELISA is comparable to immunoprecipitation in the detection of selected myositis-specific autoantibodies in a European population |
title_short | The use of ELISA is comparable to immunoprecipitation in the detection of selected myositis-specific autoantibodies in a European population |
title_sort | use of elisa is comparable to immunoprecipitation in the detection of selected myositis-specific autoantibodies in a european population |
topic | Immunology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9514093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36177007 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.975939 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT loganathanaravinthan theuseofelisaiscomparabletoimmunoprecipitationinthedetectionofselectedmyositisspecificautoantibodiesinaeuropeanpopulation AT mcmorrowfionnuala theuseofelisaiscomparabletoimmunoprecipitationinthedetectionofselectedmyositisspecificautoantibodiesinaeuropeanpopulation AT luhui theuseofelisaiscomparabletoimmunoprecipitationinthedetectionofselectedmyositisspecificautoantibodiesinaeuropeanpopulation AT lidanyang theuseofelisaiscomparabletoimmunoprecipitationinthedetectionofselectedmyositisspecificautoantibodiesinaeuropeanpopulation AT mulhearnben theuseofelisaiscomparabletoimmunoprecipitationinthedetectionofselectedmyositisspecificautoantibodiesinaeuropeanpopulation AT mchughneiljohn theuseofelisaiscomparabletoimmunoprecipitationinthedetectionofselectedmyositisspecificautoantibodiesinaeuropeanpopulation AT tansleysarahlouise theuseofelisaiscomparabletoimmunoprecipitationinthedetectionofselectedmyositisspecificautoantibodiesinaeuropeanpopulation AT loganathanaravinthan useofelisaiscomparabletoimmunoprecipitationinthedetectionofselectedmyositisspecificautoantibodiesinaeuropeanpopulation AT mcmorrowfionnuala useofelisaiscomparabletoimmunoprecipitationinthedetectionofselectedmyositisspecificautoantibodiesinaeuropeanpopulation AT luhui useofelisaiscomparabletoimmunoprecipitationinthedetectionofselectedmyositisspecificautoantibodiesinaeuropeanpopulation AT lidanyang useofelisaiscomparabletoimmunoprecipitationinthedetectionofselectedmyositisspecificautoantibodiesinaeuropeanpopulation AT mulhearnben useofelisaiscomparabletoimmunoprecipitationinthedetectionofselectedmyositisspecificautoantibodiesinaeuropeanpopulation AT mchughneiljohn useofelisaiscomparabletoimmunoprecipitationinthedetectionofselectedmyositisspecificautoantibodiesinaeuropeanpopulation AT tansleysarahlouise useofelisaiscomparabletoimmunoprecipitationinthedetectionofselectedmyositisspecificautoantibodiesinaeuropeanpopulation |