Cargando…

The use of ELISA is comparable to immunoprecipitation in the detection of selected myositis-specific autoantibodies in a European population

BACKGROUND: The reliable detection of myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSA) provides valuable clinical information regarding prognosis, clinical progression and diagnostic confirmation. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reliability of a commercial ELISA immunoassay in detecting myositis-specific autoanti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Loganathan, Aravinthan, McMorrow, Fionnuala, Lu, Hui, Li, Danyang, Mulhearn, Ben, McHugh, Neil John, Tansley, Sarah Louise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9514093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36177007
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.975939
_version_ 1784798203977138176
author Loganathan, Aravinthan
McMorrow, Fionnuala
Lu, Hui
Li, Danyang
Mulhearn, Ben
McHugh, Neil John
Tansley, Sarah Louise
author_facet Loganathan, Aravinthan
McMorrow, Fionnuala
Lu, Hui
Li, Danyang
Mulhearn, Ben
McHugh, Neil John
Tansley, Sarah Louise
author_sort Loganathan, Aravinthan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The reliable detection of myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSA) provides valuable clinical information regarding prognosis, clinical progression and diagnostic confirmation. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reliability of a commercial ELISA immunoassay in detecting myositis-specific autoantibodies in comparison to immunoprecipitation as the reference standard. METHODS: Serum samples were chosen from a biobank of more than 3000 samples. Samples with a confirmed MSA on Immunoprecipitation (n=116) were evaluated in duplicate by ELISA to detect Mi2, MDA5, Jo1, EJ, KS, PL-7 and PL-12 (Medical & Biological Laboratories Co. Ltd, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan). Healthy control samples (n=246) confirmed autoantibody negative by immunoprecipitation were similarly assessed. RESULTS: There was a very good agreement between ELISA and immunoprecipitation for serum samples containing anti-Mi2, MDA5, Jo1, EJ, KS and PL-7 and PL-12 auto-antibodies. Cohen’s κ values ranged from 0.86-1 for the measured autoantibodies on ELISA. CONCLUSION: ELISA was an accurate method for detecting anti-synthetase, anti-Mi2 and anti-MDA5 autoantibodies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9514093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95140932022-09-28 The use of ELISA is comparable to immunoprecipitation in the detection of selected myositis-specific autoantibodies in a European population Loganathan, Aravinthan McMorrow, Fionnuala Lu, Hui Li, Danyang Mulhearn, Ben McHugh, Neil John Tansley, Sarah Louise Front Immunol Immunology BACKGROUND: The reliable detection of myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSA) provides valuable clinical information regarding prognosis, clinical progression and diagnostic confirmation. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reliability of a commercial ELISA immunoassay in detecting myositis-specific autoantibodies in comparison to immunoprecipitation as the reference standard. METHODS: Serum samples were chosen from a biobank of more than 3000 samples. Samples with a confirmed MSA on Immunoprecipitation (n=116) were evaluated in duplicate by ELISA to detect Mi2, MDA5, Jo1, EJ, KS, PL-7 and PL-12 (Medical & Biological Laboratories Co. Ltd, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan). Healthy control samples (n=246) confirmed autoantibody negative by immunoprecipitation were similarly assessed. RESULTS: There was a very good agreement between ELISA and immunoprecipitation for serum samples containing anti-Mi2, MDA5, Jo1, EJ, KS and PL-7 and PL-12 auto-antibodies. Cohen’s κ values ranged from 0.86-1 for the measured autoantibodies on ELISA. CONCLUSION: ELISA was an accurate method for detecting anti-synthetase, anti-Mi2 and anti-MDA5 autoantibodies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9514093/ /pubmed/36177007 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.975939 Text en Copyright © 2022 Loganathan, McMorrow, Lu, Li, Mulhearn, McHugh and Tansley https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Loganathan, Aravinthan
McMorrow, Fionnuala
Lu, Hui
Li, Danyang
Mulhearn, Ben
McHugh, Neil John
Tansley, Sarah Louise
The use of ELISA is comparable to immunoprecipitation in the detection of selected myositis-specific autoantibodies in a European population
title The use of ELISA is comparable to immunoprecipitation in the detection of selected myositis-specific autoantibodies in a European population
title_full The use of ELISA is comparable to immunoprecipitation in the detection of selected myositis-specific autoantibodies in a European population
title_fullStr The use of ELISA is comparable to immunoprecipitation in the detection of selected myositis-specific autoantibodies in a European population
title_full_unstemmed The use of ELISA is comparable to immunoprecipitation in the detection of selected myositis-specific autoantibodies in a European population
title_short The use of ELISA is comparable to immunoprecipitation in the detection of selected myositis-specific autoantibodies in a European population
title_sort use of elisa is comparable to immunoprecipitation in the detection of selected myositis-specific autoantibodies in a european population
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9514093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36177007
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.975939
work_keys_str_mv AT loganathanaravinthan theuseofelisaiscomparabletoimmunoprecipitationinthedetectionofselectedmyositisspecificautoantibodiesinaeuropeanpopulation
AT mcmorrowfionnuala theuseofelisaiscomparabletoimmunoprecipitationinthedetectionofselectedmyositisspecificautoantibodiesinaeuropeanpopulation
AT luhui theuseofelisaiscomparabletoimmunoprecipitationinthedetectionofselectedmyositisspecificautoantibodiesinaeuropeanpopulation
AT lidanyang theuseofelisaiscomparabletoimmunoprecipitationinthedetectionofselectedmyositisspecificautoantibodiesinaeuropeanpopulation
AT mulhearnben theuseofelisaiscomparabletoimmunoprecipitationinthedetectionofselectedmyositisspecificautoantibodiesinaeuropeanpopulation
AT mchughneiljohn theuseofelisaiscomparabletoimmunoprecipitationinthedetectionofselectedmyositisspecificautoantibodiesinaeuropeanpopulation
AT tansleysarahlouise theuseofelisaiscomparabletoimmunoprecipitationinthedetectionofselectedmyositisspecificautoantibodiesinaeuropeanpopulation
AT loganathanaravinthan useofelisaiscomparabletoimmunoprecipitationinthedetectionofselectedmyositisspecificautoantibodiesinaeuropeanpopulation
AT mcmorrowfionnuala useofelisaiscomparabletoimmunoprecipitationinthedetectionofselectedmyositisspecificautoantibodiesinaeuropeanpopulation
AT luhui useofelisaiscomparabletoimmunoprecipitationinthedetectionofselectedmyositisspecificautoantibodiesinaeuropeanpopulation
AT lidanyang useofelisaiscomparabletoimmunoprecipitationinthedetectionofselectedmyositisspecificautoantibodiesinaeuropeanpopulation
AT mulhearnben useofelisaiscomparabletoimmunoprecipitationinthedetectionofselectedmyositisspecificautoantibodiesinaeuropeanpopulation
AT mchughneiljohn useofelisaiscomparabletoimmunoprecipitationinthedetectionofselectedmyositisspecificautoantibodiesinaeuropeanpopulation
AT tansleysarahlouise useofelisaiscomparabletoimmunoprecipitationinthedetectionofselectedmyositisspecificautoantibodiesinaeuropeanpopulation