Cargando…

Understanding cognitive differences in the effect of digitalization on ambidextrous innovation: Moderating role of industrial knowledge base

A number of existing researches agree that digitalization would facility firms to launch ambidextrous innovations. Digitalization is not only about technological change, but more importantly, the reshaping of the firms’ knowledge structure and routines to percept and integrate knowledge. Thus, some...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Qiang, Liu, Hanlin, Chen, Yi, Tian, Kexin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9514140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36176792
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.983844
_version_ 1784798214092750848
author Xu, Qiang
Liu, Hanlin
Chen, Yi
Tian, Kexin
author_facet Xu, Qiang
Liu, Hanlin
Chen, Yi
Tian, Kexin
author_sort Xu, Qiang
collection PubMed
description A number of existing researches agree that digitalization would facility firms to launch ambidextrous innovations. Digitalization is not only about technological change, but more importantly, the reshaping of the firms’ knowledge structure and routines to percept and integrate knowledge. Thus, some researchers suggest that whether firms could benefit from digitalization varies across firms and industries, since innovation in different firms and industries relies on differentiated level of cognitive and reasoning of knowledge. However, existing studies mainly focus on exploring the firm-level differences, and leave the industry-level difference underdeveloped. In response, this study integrates knowledge-based view to examine how a firm’s digitalization affects ambidextrous innovation, and further explore the conjoint effect of industrial knowledge bases—the knowledge base of the industry the firm is located in—on the relationship between firm digitalization level and ambidextrous innovation. This study uses Python to conduct text mining of firms’ annual reports, and obtains data of 394 listed companies from the year 2014 to 2020. The empirical results show that digitalization level has positive effect on both exploratory innovation and exploitative innovation, and the effect on exploitative innovation is stronger than on exploratory innovation. Moreover, the moderating effect of industrial knowledge base is significant on “digitalization–exploratory innovation” but not on “digitalization–exploitative innovation” relationship. By doing so, this study refines the research on the relationship between digitalization and firm innovation, and confirms that the usage of digitalization may lead to achieve an ambidextrous situation. This study also provides a theoretical basis for industrial differences of the effectiveness of digitalization, suggesting firms considering industrial characteristics to implement digitalization-assisted innovation practices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9514140
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95141402022-09-28 Understanding cognitive differences in the effect of digitalization on ambidextrous innovation: Moderating role of industrial knowledge base Xu, Qiang Liu, Hanlin Chen, Yi Tian, Kexin Front Psychol Psychology A number of existing researches agree that digitalization would facility firms to launch ambidextrous innovations. Digitalization is not only about technological change, but more importantly, the reshaping of the firms’ knowledge structure and routines to percept and integrate knowledge. Thus, some researchers suggest that whether firms could benefit from digitalization varies across firms and industries, since innovation in different firms and industries relies on differentiated level of cognitive and reasoning of knowledge. However, existing studies mainly focus on exploring the firm-level differences, and leave the industry-level difference underdeveloped. In response, this study integrates knowledge-based view to examine how a firm’s digitalization affects ambidextrous innovation, and further explore the conjoint effect of industrial knowledge bases—the knowledge base of the industry the firm is located in—on the relationship between firm digitalization level and ambidextrous innovation. This study uses Python to conduct text mining of firms’ annual reports, and obtains data of 394 listed companies from the year 2014 to 2020. The empirical results show that digitalization level has positive effect on both exploratory innovation and exploitative innovation, and the effect on exploitative innovation is stronger than on exploratory innovation. Moreover, the moderating effect of industrial knowledge base is significant on “digitalization–exploratory innovation” but not on “digitalization–exploitative innovation” relationship. By doing so, this study refines the research on the relationship between digitalization and firm innovation, and confirms that the usage of digitalization may lead to achieve an ambidextrous situation. This study also provides a theoretical basis for industrial differences of the effectiveness of digitalization, suggesting firms considering industrial characteristics to implement digitalization-assisted innovation practices. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9514140/ /pubmed/36176792 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.983844 Text en Copyright © 2022 Xu, Liu, Chen and Tian. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Xu, Qiang
Liu, Hanlin
Chen, Yi
Tian, Kexin
Understanding cognitive differences in the effect of digitalization on ambidextrous innovation: Moderating role of industrial knowledge base
title Understanding cognitive differences in the effect of digitalization on ambidextrous innovation: Moderating role of industrial knowledge base
title_full Understanding cognitive differences in the effect of digitalization on ambidextrous innovation: Moderating role of industrial knowledge base
title_fullStr Understanding cognitive differences in the effect of digitalization on ambidextrous innovation: Moderating role of industrial knowledge base
title_full_unstemmed Understanding cognitive differences in the effect of digitalization on ambidextrous innovation: Moderating role of industrial knowledge base
title_short Understanding cognitive differences in the effect of digitalization on ambidextrous innovation: Moderating role of industrial knowledge base
title_sort understanding cognitive differences in the effect of digitalization on ambidextrous innovation: moderating role of industrial knowledge base
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9514140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36176792
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.983844
work_keys_str_mv AT xuqiang understandingcognitivedifferencesintheeffectofdigitalizationonambidextrousinnovationmoderatingroleofindustrialknowledgebase
AT liuhanlin understandingcognitivedifferencesintheeffectofdigitalizationonambidextrousinnovationmoderatingroleofindustrialknowledgebase
AT chenyi understandingcognitivedifferencesintheeffectofdigitalizationonambidextrousinnovationmoderatingroleofindustrialknowledgebase
AT tiankexin understandingcognitivedifferencesintheeffectofdigitalizationonambidextrousinnovationmoderatingroleofindustrialknowledgebase