Cargando…
Understanding cognitive differences in the effect of digitalization on ambidextrous innovation: Moderating role of industrial knowledge base
A number of existing researches agree that digitalization would facility firms to launch ambidextrous innovations. Digitalization is not only about technological change, but more importantly, the reshaping of the firms’ knowledge structure and routines to percept and integrate knowledge. Thus, some...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9514140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36176792 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.983844 |
_version_ | 1784798214092750848 |
---|---|
author | Xu, Qiang Liu, Hanlin Chen, Yi Tian, Kexin |
author_facet | Xu, Qiang Liu, Hanlin Chen, Yi Tian, Kexin |
author_sort | Xu, Qiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | A number of existing researches agree that digitalization would facility firms to launch ambidextrous innovations. Digitalization is not only about technological change, but more importantly, the reshaping of the firms’ knowledge structure and routines to percept and integrate knowledge. Thus, some researchers suggest that whether firms could benefit from digitalization varies across firms and industries, since innovation in different firms and industries relies on differentiated level of cognitive and reasoning of knowledge. However, existing studies mainly focus on exploring the firm-level differences, and leave the industry-level difference underdeveloped. In response, this study integrates knowledge-based view to examine how a firm’s digitalization affects ambidextrous innovation, and further explore the conjoint effect of industrial knowledge bases—the knowledge base of the industry the firm is located in—on the relationship between firm digitalization level and ambidextrous innovation. This study uses Python to conduct text mining of firms’ annual reports, and obtains data of 394 listed companies from the year 2014 to 2020. The empirical results show that digitalization level has positive effect on both exploratory innovation and exploitative innovation, and the effect on exploitative innovation is stronger than on exploratory innovation. Moreover, the moderating effect of industrial knowledge base is significant on “digitalization–exploratory innovation” but not on “digitalization–exploitative innovation” relationship. By doing so, this study refines the research on the relationship between digitalization and firm innovation, and confirms that the usage of digitalization may lead to achieve an ambidextrous situation. This study also provides a theoretical basis for industrial differences of the effectiveness of digitalization, suggesting firms considering industrial characteristics to implement digitalization-assisted innovation practices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9514140 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95141402022-09-28 Understanding cognitive differences in the effect of digitalization on ambidextrous innovation: Moderating role of industrial knowledge base Xu, Qiang Liu, Hanlin Chen, Yi Tian, Kexin Front Psychol Psychology A number of existing researches agree that digitalization would facility firms to launch ambidextrous innovations. Digitalization is not only about technological change, but more importantly, the reshaping of the firms’ knowledge structure and routines to percept and integrate knowledge. Thus, some researchers suggest that whether firms could benefit from digitalization varies across firms and industries, since innovation in different firms and industries relies on differentiated level of cognitive and reasoning of knowledge. However, existing studies mainly focus on exploring the firm-level differences, and leave the industry-level difference underdeveloped. In response, this study integrates knowledge-based view to examine how a firm’s digitalization affects ambidextrous innovation, and further explore the conjoint effect of industrial knowledge bases—the knowledge base of the industry the firm is located in—on the relationship between firm digitalization level and ambidextrous innovation. This study uses Python to conduct text mining of firms’ annual reports, and obtains data of 394 listed companies from the year 2014 to 2020. The empirical results show that digitalization level has positive effect on both exploratory innovation and exploitative innovation, and the effect on exploitative innovation is stronger than on exploratory innovation. Moreover, the moderating effect of industrial knowledge base is significant on “digitalization–exploratory innovation” but not on “digitalization–exploitative innovation” relationship. By doing so, this study refines the research on the relationship between digitalization and firm innovation, and confirms that the usage of digitalization may lead to achieve an ambidextrous situation. This study also provides a theoretical basis for industrial differences of the effectiveness of digitalization, suggesting firms considering industrial characteristics to implement digitalization-assisted innovation practices. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9514140/ /pubmed/36176792 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.983844 Text en Copyright © 2022 Xu, Liu, Chen and Tian. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Xu, Qiang Liu, Hanlin Chen, Yi Tian, Kexin Understanding cognitive differences in the effect of digitalization on ambidextrous innovation: Moderating role of industrial knowledge base |
title | Understanding cognitive differences in the effect of digitalization on ambidextrous innovation: Moderating role of industrial knowledge base |
title_full | Understanding cognitive differences in the effect of digitalization on ambidextrous innovation: Moderating role of industrial knowledge base |
title_fullStr | Understanding cognitive differences in the effect of digitalization on ambidextrous innovation: Moderating role of industrial knowledge base |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding cognitive differences in the effect of digitalization on ambidextrous innovation: Moderating role of industrial knowledge base |
title_short | Understanding cognitive differences in the effect of digitalization on ambidextrous innovation: Moderating role of industrial knowledge base |
title_sort | understanding cognitive differences in the effect of digitalization on ambidextrous innovation: moderating role of industrial knowledge base |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9514140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36176792 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.983844 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xuqiang understandingcognitivedifferencesintheeffectofdigitalizationonambidextrousinnovationmoderatingroleofindustrialknowledgebase AT liuhanlin understandingcognitivedifferencesintheeffectofdigitalizationonambidextrousinnovationmoderatingroleofindustrialknowledgebase AT chenyi understandingcognitivedifferencesintheeffectofdigitalizationonambidextrousinnovationmoderatingroleofindustrialknowledgebase AT tiankexin understandingcognitivedifferencesintheeffectofdigitalizationonambidextrousinnovationmoderatingroleofindustrialknowledgebase |