Cargando…
The Relationship between Neural Foraminal Stenosis and Imaging Features of Lumbar Spine MRI in Patients Older Than 60 Years with Lumbar Radiculopathy
PURPOSE: To investigate the MRI features associated with neural foraminal stenosis (NFS) in patients older than 60 years with lumbar (L) radiculopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 133 retrospectively selected patients older than 60 years with lumbar radiculopathy who had undergone a l...
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Radiology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9514398/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36238060 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2020.0095 |
_version_ | 1784798265000067072 |
---|---|
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To investigate the MRI features associated with neural foraminal stenosis (NFS) in patients older than 60 years with lumbar (L) radiculopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 133 retrospectively selected patients older than 60 years with lumbar radiculopathy who had undergone a lumbar spine MRI (from January 2018 to April 2018). For L4/L5 and L5/sacral (S)1 levels, NFS was reviewed blindly by two radiologists. Spondylolisthesis, retrolisthesis, disc height loss, disc bulging/herniation/central canal stenosis, ligamentum flavum thickening, and facet hypertrophy were evaluated separately for the NFS and non-NFS groups, and they were compared using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The univariate analysis revealed that disc height loss (p = 0.006) was associated with NFS for L4/L5. For L5/S1, both spondylolisthesis (p = 0.005) and facet hypertrophy (p = 0.006) were associated with NFS. The multivariate logistic analysis revealed that disc height loss was associated with NFS for L4/L5 [odds ratio (OR) = 4.272; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.736–10.514]. For L5/S1, spondylolisthesis (OR = 3.696; 95% CI 1.297–10.530) and facet hypertrophy (OR = 6.468; 95% CI 1.283–32.617) were associated with NFS. CONCLUSION: Disc height loss was associated with NFS for L4/L5 and spondylJophy were associated with NFS for L5/S1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9514398 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Radiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95143982022-10-12 The Relationship between Neural Foraminal Stenosis and Imaging Features of Lumbar Spine MRI in Patients Older Than 60 Years with Lumbar Radiculopathy Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi Musculoskeletal Imaging PURPOSE: To investigate the MRI features associated with neural foraminal stenosis (NFS) in patients older than 60 years with lumbar (L) radiculopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 133 retrospectively selected patients older than 60 years with lumbar radiculopathy who had undergone a lumbar spine MRI (from January 2018 to April 2018). For L4/L5 and L5/sacral (S)1 levels, NFS was reviewed blindly by two radiologists. Spondylolisthesis, retrolisthesis, disc height loss, disc bulging/herniation/central canal stenosis, ligamentum flavum thickening, and facet hypertrophy were evaluated separately for the NFS and non-NFS groups, and they were compared using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The univariate analysis revealed that disc height loss (p = 0.006) was associated with NFS for L4/L5. For L5/S1, both spondylolisthesis (p = 0.005) and facet hypertrophy (p = 0.006) were associated with NFS. The multivariate logistic analysis revealed that disc height loss was associated with NFS for L4/L5 [odds ratio (OR) = 4.272; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.736–10.514]. For L5/S1, spondylolisthesis (OR = 3.696; 95% CI 1.297–10.530) and facet hypertrophy (OR = 6.468; 95% CI 1.283–32.617) were associated with NFS. CONCLUSION: Disc height loss was associated with NFS for L4/L5 and spondylJophy were associated with NFS for L5/S1. The Korean Society of Radiology 2021-07 2021-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9514398/ /pubmed/36238060 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2020.0095 Text en Copyrights © 2021 The Korean Society of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Musculoskeletal Imaging The Relationship between Neural Foraminal Stenosis and Imaging Features of Lumbar Spine MRI in Patients Older Than 60 Years with Lumbar Radiculopathy |
title | The Relationship between Neural Foraminal Stenosis and Imaging Features of Lumbar Spine MRI in Patients Older Than 60 Years with Lumbar Radiculopathy |
title_full | The Relationship between Neural Foraminal Stenosis and Imaging Features of Lumbar Spine MRI in Patients Older Than 60 Years with Lumbar Radiculopathy |
title_fullStr | The Relationship between Neural Foraminal Stenosis and Imaging Features of Lumbar Spine MRI in Patients Older Than 60 Years with Lumbar Radiculopathy |
title_full_unstemmed | The Relationship between Neural Foraminal Stenosis and Imaging Features of Lumbar Spine MRI in Patients Older Than 60 Years with Lumbar Radiculopathy |
title_short | The Relationship between Neural Foraminal Stenosis and Imaging Features of Lumbar Spine MRI in Patients Older Than 60 Years with Lumbar Radiculopathy |
title_sort | relationship between neural foraminal stenosis and imaging features of lumbar spine mri in patients older than 60 years with lumbar radiculopathy |
topic | Musculoskeletal Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9514398/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36238060 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2020.0095 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT therelationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy AT therelationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy AT therelationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy AT therelationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy AT therelationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy AT therelationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy AT therelationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy AT therelationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy AT therelationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy AT therelationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy AT relationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy AT relationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy AT relationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy AT relationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy AT relationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy AT relationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy AT relationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy AT relationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy AT relationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy AT relationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy |