Cargando…

The Relationship between Neural Foraminal Stenosis and Imaging Features of Lumbar Spine MRI in Patients Older Than 60 Years with Lumbar Radiculopathy

PURPOSE: To investigate the MRI features associated with neural foraminal stenosis (NFS) in patients older than 60 years with lumbar (L) radiculopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 133 retrospectively selected patients older than 60 years with lumbar radiculopathy who had undergone a l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Radiology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9514398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36238060
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2020.0095
_version_ 1784798265000067072
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the MRI features associated with neural foraminal stenosis (NFS) in patients older than 60 years with lumbar (L) radiculopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 133 retrospectively selected patients older than 60 years with lumbar radiculopathy who had undergone a lumbar spine MRI (from January 2018 to April 2018). For L4/L5 and L5/sacral (S)1 levels, NFS was reviewed blindly by two radiologists. Spondylolisthesis, retrolisthesis, disc height loss, disc bulging/herniation/central canal stenosis, ligamentum flavum thickening, and facet hypertrophy were evaluated separately for the NFS and non-NFS groups, and they were compared using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The univariate analysis revealed that disc height loss (p = 0.006) was associated with NFS for L4/L5. For L5/S1, both spondylolisthesis (p = 0.005) and facet hypertrophy (p = 0.006) were associated with NFS. The multivariate logistic analysis revealed that disc height loss was associated with NFS for L4/L5 [odds ratio (OR) = 4.272; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.736–10.514]. For L5/S1, spondylolisthesis (OR = 3.696; 95% CI 1.297–10.530) and facet hypertrophy (OR = 6.468; 95% CI 1.283–32.617) were associated with NFS. CONCLUSION: Disc height loss was associated with NFS for L4/L5 and spondylJophy were associated with NFS for L5/S1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9514398
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Korean Society of Radiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95143982022-10-12 The Relationship between Neural Foraminal Stenosis and Imaging Features of Lumbar Spine MRI in Patients Older Than 60 Years with Lumbar Radiculopathy Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi Musculoskeletal Imaging PURPOSE: To investigate the MRI features associated with neural foraminal stenosis (NFS) in patients older than 60 years with lumbar (L) radiculopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 133 retrospectively selected patients older than 60 years with lumbar radiculopathy who had undergone a lumbar spine MRI (from January 2018 to April 2018). For L4/L5 and L5/sacral (S)1 levels, NFS was reviewed blindly by two radiologists. Spondylolisthesis, retrolisthesis, disc height loss, disc bulging/herniation/central canal stenosis, ligamentum flavum thickening, and facet hypertrophy were evaluated separately for the NFS and non-NFS groups, and they were compared using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The univariate analysis revealed that disc height loss (p = 0.006) was associated with NFS for L4/L5. For L5/S1, both spondylolisthesis (p = 0.005) and facet hypertrophy (p = 0.006) were associated with NFS. The multivariate logistic analysis revealed that disc height loss was associated with NFS for L4/L5 [odds ratio (OR) = 4.272; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.736–10.514]. For L5/S1, spondylolisthesis (OR = 3.696; 95% CI 1.297–10.530) and facet hypertrophy (OR = 6.468; 95% CI 1.283–32.617) were associated with NFS. CONCLUSION: Disc height loss was associated with NFS for L4/L5 and spondylJophy were associated with NFS for L5/S1. The Korean Society of Radiology 2021-07 2021-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9514398/ /pubmed/36238060 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2020.0095 Text en Copyrights © 2021 The Korean Society of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Musculoskeletal Imaging
The Relationship between Neural Foraminal Stenosis and Imaging Features of Lumbar Spine MRI in Patients Older Than 60 Years with Lumbar Radiculopathy
title The Relationship between Neural Foraminal Stenosis and Imaging Features of Lumbar Spine MRI in Patients Older Than 60 Years with Lumbar Radiculopathy
title_full The Relationship between Neural Foraminal Stenosis and Imaging Features of Lumbar Spine MRI in Patients Older Than 60 Years with Lumbar Radiculopathy
title_fullStr The Relationship between Neural Foraminal Stenosis and Imaging Features of Lumbar Spine MRI in Patients Older Than 60 Years with Lumbar Radiculopathy
title_full_unstemmed The Relationship between Neural Foraminal Stenosis and Imaging Features of Lumbar Spine MRI in Patients Older Than 60 Years with Lumbar Radiculopathy
title_short The Relationship between Neural Foraminal Stenosis and Imaging Features of Lumbar Spine MRI in Patients Older Than 60 Years with Lumbar Radiculopathy
title_sort relationship between neural foraminal stenosis and imaging features of lumbar spine mri in patients older than 60 years with lumbar radiculopathy
topic Musculoskeletal Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9514398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36238060
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2020.0095
work_keys_str_mv AT therelationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy
AT therelationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy
AT therelationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy
AT therelationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy
AT therelationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy
AT therelationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy
AT therelationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy
AT therelationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy
AT therelationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy
AT therelationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy
AT relationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy
AT relationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy
AT relationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy
AT relationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy
AT relationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy
AT relationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy
AT relationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy
AT relationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy
AT relationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy
AT relationshipbetweenneuralforaminalstenosisandimagingfeaturesoflumbarspinemriinpatientsolderthan60yearswithlumbarradiculopathy