Cargando…

Luminal Preservation Protects the Small Intestine in a Brain-dead Rat Model

Intestinal transplantation depends on donation after brain death (DBD). Luminal preservation (LP) has been beneficial against preservation injury in previous studies in animal models, but none include DBD. This study aims to investigate whether these benefits occur also with DBD. METHODS. Wistar rat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trentadue, Guido, Vecchio, Leandro, Kats-Ugurlu, Gursah, Vernengo, Julieta, Haveman, Jan Willem, Ivanoff, Ivana, Faber, Klaas Nico, Rumbo, Martín, Dijkstra, Gerard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9514830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36176723
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001378
_version_ 1784798355394658304
author Trentadue, Guido
Vecchio, Leandro
Kats-Ugurlu, Gursah
Vernengo, Julieta
Haveman, Jan Willem
Ivanoff, Ivana
Faber, Klaas Nico
Rumbo, Martín
Dijkstra, Gerard
author_facet Trentadue, Guido
Vecchio, Leandro
Kats-Ugurlu, Gursah
Vernengo, Julieta
Haveman, Jan Willem
Ivanoff, Ivana
Faber, Klaas Nico
Rumbo, Martín
Dijkstra, Gerard
author_sort Trentadue, Guido
collection PubMed
description Intestinal transplantation depends on donation after brain death (DBD). Luminal preservation (LP) has been beneficial against preservation injury in previous studies in animal models, but none include DBD. This study aims to investigate whether these benefits occur also with DBD. METHODS. Wistar rats (male, N = 9) underwent brain death for 2 h. Thereafter, vascular perfusion was done with University of Wisconsin solution (UW). The small intestine was then explanted and randomized into 3 groups: control (empty segment), LP+PEG (with polyethylene glycol 3350 solution), or LP+UW (with UW), treated and tied shut. Ice-cold UW was used for cold storage. Samples were taken at procurement and after 4 (t = 4) and 8 h (t = 8) of preservation. Histopathological scorings were performed for intestinal preservation injury, subepithelial space, absence of epithelial lining, and hemeoxygenase-1 expression. RESULTS. There was low-level mucosal injury (median intestinal preservation injury score 2) at procurement. At t = 4, bowels treated without LP had more damage than LP-treated samples (control score 4, LP+PEG 2 and LP+UW 2, P < 0.001 control versus LP+UW). At t = 8, no benefit of LP was observed (control 2, LP+PEG 3, LP+UW 2). Subepithelial space increased with time and the presence of LP; epithelial lining was better conserved in LP-treated samples. Hemeoxygenase-1 staining showed increased intensity with increased damage, irrespective of treatment. CONCLUSIONS. Luminal perfusion of the small intestine with UW or PEG protects the mucosa in brain-dead rats for up to 4 h. Fewer benefits of LP were found than previously described in non-DBD models. To mimic the clinical situation, DBD should be included in future animal studies on intestinal preservation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9514830
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95148302022-09-28 Luminal Preservation Protects the Small Intestine in a Brain-dead Rat Model Trentadue, Guido Vecchio, Leandro Kats-Ugurlu, Gursah Vernengo, Julieta Haveman, Jan Willem Ivanoff, Ivana Faber, Klaas Nico Rumbo, Martín Dijkstra, Gerard Transplant Direct Basic Science Intestinal transplantation depends on donation after brain death (DBD). Luminal preservation (LP) has been beneficial against preservation injury in previous studies in animal models, but none include DBD. This study aims to investigate whether these benefits occur also with DBD. METHODS. Wistar rats (male, N = 9) underwent brain death for 2 h. Thereafter, vascular perfusion was done with University of Wisconsin solution (UW). The small intestine was then explanted and randomized into 3 groups: control (empty segment), LP+PEG (with polyethylene glycol 3350 solution), or LP+UW (with UW), treated and tied shut. Ice-cold UW was used for cold storage. Samples were taken at procurement and after 4 (t = 4) and 8 h (t = 8) of preservation. Histopathological scorings were performed for intestinal preservation injury, subepithelial space, absence of epithelial lining, and hemeoxygenase-1 expression. RESULTS. There was low-level mucosal injury (median intestinal preservation injury score 2) at procurement. At t = 4, bowels treated without LP had more damage than LP-treated samples (control score 4, LP+PEG 2 and LP+UW 2, P < 0.001 control versus LP+UW). At t = 8, no benefit of LP was observed (control 2, LP+PEG 3, LP+UW 2). Subepithelial space increased with time and the presence of LP; epithelial lining was better conserved in LP-treated samples. Hemeoxygenase-1 staining showed increased intensity with increased damage, irrespective of treatment. CONCLUSIONS. Luminal perfusion of the small intestine with UW or PEG protects the mucosa in brain-dead rats for up to 4 h. Fewer benefits of LP were found than previously described in non-DBD models. To mimic the clinical situation, DBD should be included in future animal studies on intestinal preservation. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9514830/ /pubmed/36176723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001378 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Transplantation Direct. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Basic Science
Trentadue, Guido
Vecchio, Leandro
Kats-Ugurlu, Gursah
Vernengo, Julieta
Haveman, Jan Willem
Ivanoff, Ivana
Faber, Klaas Nico
Rumbo, Martín
Dijkstra, Gerard
Luminal Preservation Protects the Small Intestine in a Brain-dead Rat Model
title Luminal Preservation Protects the Small Intestine in a Brain-dead Rat Model
title_full Luminal Preservation Protects the Small Intestine in a Brain-dead Rat Model
title_fullStr Luminal Preservation Protects the Small Intestine in a Brain-dead Rat Model
title_full_unstemmed Luminal Preservation Protects the Small Intestine in a Brain-dead Rat Model
title_short Luminal Preservation Protects the Small Intestine in a Brain-dead Rat Model
title_sort luminal preservation protects the small intestine in a brain-dead rat model
topic Basic Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9514830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36176723
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001378
work_keys_str_mv AT trentadueguido luminalpreservationprotectsthesmallintestineinabraindeadratmodel
AT vecchioleandro luminalpreservationprotectsthesmallintestineinabraindeadratmodel
AT katsugurlugursah luminalpreservationprotectsthesmallintestineinabraindeadratmodel
AT vernengojulieta luminalpreservationprotectsthesmallintestineinabraindeadratmodel
AT havemanjanwillem luminalpreservationprotectsthesmallintestineinabraindeadratmodel
AT ivanoffivana luminalpreservationprotectsthesmallintestineinabraindeadratmodel
AT faberklaasnico luminalpreservationprotectsthesmallintestineinabraindeadratmodel
AT rumbomartin luminalpreservationprotectsthesmallintestineinabraindeadratmodel
AT dijkstragerard luminalpreservationprotectsthesmallintestineinabraindeadratmodel