Cargando…

Investigation of chicken housekeeping genes using next-generation sequencing data

Accurate normalization of the gene expression assays, using housekeeping genes (HKGs), is critically necessary. To do so, selection of a proper set of HKGs for a specific experiment is of great importance. Despite many studies, there is no consensus about the suitable set of HKGs for implementing in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasanpur, Karim, Hosseinzadeh, Sevda, Mirzaaghayi, Atiye, Alijani, Sadegh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9514876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36176302
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.827538
_version_ 1784798366592401408
author Hasanpur, Karim
Hosseinzadeh, Sevda
Mirzaaghayi, Atiye
Alijani, Sadegh
author_facet Hasanpur, Karim
Hosseinzadeh, Sevda
Mirzaaghayi, Atiye
Alijani, Sadegh
author_sort Hasanpur, Karim
collection PubMed
description Accurate normalization of the gene expression assays, using housekeeping genes (HKGs), is critically necessary. To do so, selection of a proper set of HKGs for a specific experiment is of great importance. Despite many studies, there is no consensus about the suitable set of HKGs for implementing in the quantitative real-time PCR analyses of chicken tissues. A limited number of HKGs have been widely used. However, wide utilization of a little number of HKGs for all tissues is challenging. The emergence of high-throughput gene expression RNA-seq data has enabled the simultaneous comparison of the stability of multiple HKGs. Therefore, employing the average coefficient of variations of at least three datasets per tissue, we sorted all reliably expressed genes (REGs; with FPKM ≥ 1 in at least one sample) and introduced the top 10 most suitable and stable reference genes for each of the 16 chicken tissues. We evaluated the consistency of the results of five tissues using the same methodology on other datasets. Furthermore, we assessed 96 previously widely used HKGs (WU-HKGs) in order to challenge the accuracy of the previous studies. The New Tuxedo software suite was used for the main analyses. The results revealed novel, different sets of reference genes for each of the tissues with 17 common genes among the top 10 genes lists of 16 tissues. The results did disprove the suitability of WU-HKGs such as Actb, Ldha, Scd, B2m, and Hprt1 for any of the tissues examined. On the contrary, a total of 6, 13, 14, 23, and 32 validated housekeeping genes (V-HKGs) were discovered as the most stable and suitable reference genes for muscle, spleen, liver, heart, and kidney tissues, respectively. Although we identified a few new HKGs usable for multiple tissues, the selection of suitable HKGs is required to be tissue specific. The newly introduced reference genes from the present study, despite lacking experimental validation, will be able to contribute to the more accurate normalization for future expression analysis of chicken genes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9514876
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95148762022-09-28 Investigation of chicken housekeeping genes using next-generation sequencing data Hasanpur, Karim Hosseinzadeh, Sevda Mirzaaghayi, Atiye Alijani, Sadegh Front Genet Genetics Accurate normalization of the gene expression assays, using housekeeping genes (HKGs), is critically necessary. To do so, selection of a proper set of HKGs for a specific experiment is of great importance. Despite many studies, there is no consensus about the suitable set of HKGs for implementing in the quantitative real-time PCR analyses of chicken tissues. A limited number of HKGs have been widely used. However, wide utilization of a little number of HKGs for all tissues is challenging. The emergence of high-throughput gene expression RNA-seq data has enabled the simultaneous comparison of the stability of multiple HKGs. Therefore, employing the average coefficient of variations of at least three datasets per tissue, we sorted all reliably expressed genes (REGs; with FPKM ≥ 1 in at least one sample) and introduced the top 10 most suitable and stable reference genes for each of the 16 chicken tissues. We evaluated the consistency of the results of five tissues using the same methodology on other datasets. Furthermore, we assessed 96 previously widely used HKGs (WU-HKGs) in order to challenge the accuracy of the previous studies. The New Tuxedo software suite was used for the main analyses. The results revealed novel, different sets of reference genes for each of the tissues with 17 common genes among the top 10 genes lists of 16 tissues. The results did disprove the suitability of WU-HKGs such as Actb, Ldha, Scd, B2m, and Hprt1 for any of the tissues examined. On the contrary, a total of 6, 13, 14, 23, and 32 validated housekeeping genes (V-HKGs) were discovered as the most stable and suitable reference genes for muscle, spleen, liver, heart, and kidney tissues, respectively. Although we identified a few new HKGs usable for multiple tissues, the selection of suitable HKGs is required to be tissue specific. The newly introduced reference genes from the present study, despite lacking experimental validation, will be able to contribute to the more accurate normalization for future expression analysis of chicken genes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9514876/ /pubmed/36176302 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.827538 Text en Copyright © 2022 Hasanpur, Hosseinzadeh, Mirzaaghayi and Alijani. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Genetics
Hasanpur, Karim
Hosseinzadeh, Sevda
Mirzaaghayi, Atiye
Alijani, Sadegh
Investigation of chicken housekeeping genes using next-generation sequencing data
title Investigation of chicken housekeeping genes using next-generation sequencing data
title_full Investigation of chicken housekeeping genes using next-generation sequencing data
title_fullStr Investigation of chicken housekeeping genes using next-generation sequencing data
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of chicken housekeeping genes using next-generation sequencing data
title_short Investigation of chicken housekeeping genes using next-generation sequencing data
title_sort investigation of chicken housekeeping genes using next-generation sequencing data
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9514876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36176302
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.827538
work_keys_str_mv AT hasanpurkarim investigationofchickenhousekeepinggenesusingnextgenerationsequencingdata
AT hosseinzadehsevda investigationofchickenhousekeepinggenesusingnextgenerationsequencingdata
AT mirzaaghayiatiye investigationofchickenhousekeepinggenesusingnextgenerationsequencingdata
AT alijanisadegh investigationofchickenhousekeepinggenesusingnextgenerationsequencingdata