Cargando…
Surgical reporting for laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on phase annotation by a convolutional neural network (CNN) and the phenomenon of phase flickering: a proof of concept
PURPOSE: Surgical documentation is an important yet time-consuming necessity in clinical routine. Beside its core function to transmit information about a surgery to other medical professionals, the surgical report has gained even more significance in terms of information extraction for scientific,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9515052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35643827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02680-6 |
_version_ | 1784798407064289280 |
---|---|
author | Berlet, M. Vogel, T. Ostler, D. Czempiel, T. Kähler, M. Brunner, S. Feussner, H. Wilhelm, D. Kranzfelder, M. |
author_facet | Berlet, M. Vogel, T. Ostler, D. Czempiel, T. Kähler, M. Brunner, S. Feussner, H. Wilhelm, D. Kranzfelder, M. |
author_sort | Berlet, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Surgical documentation is an important yet time-consuming necessity in clinical routine. Beside its core function to transmit information about a surgery to other medical professionals, the surgical report has gained even more significance in terms of information extraction for scientific, administrative and judicial application. A possible basis for computer aided reporting is phase detection by convolutional neural networks (CNN). In this article we propose a workflow to generate operative notes based on the output of the TeCNO CNN. METHODS: Video recordings of 15 cholecystectomies were used for inference. The annotation of TeCNO was compared to that of an expert surgeon (HE) and the algorithm based annotation of a scientist (HA). The CNN output then was used to identify aberrance from standard course as basis for the final report. Moreover, we assessed the phenomenon of ‘phase flickering’ as clusters of incorrectly labeled frames and evaluated its usability. RESULTS: The accordance of the HE and CNN was 79.7% and that of HA and CNN 87.0%. ‘Phase flickering’ indicated an aberrant course with AUCs of 0.91 and 0.89 in ROC analysis regarding number and extend of concerned frames. Finally, we created operative notes based on a standard text, deviation alerts, and manual completion by the surgeon. CONCLUSION: Computer-aided documentation is a noteworthy use case for phase recognition in standardized surgery. The analysis of phase flickering in a CNN’s annotation has the potential of retrieving more information about the course of a particular procedure to complement an automated report. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9515052 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95150522022-09-29 Surgical reporting for laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on phase annotation by a convolutional neural network (CNN) and the phenomenon of phase flickering: a proof of concept Berlet, M. Vogel, T. Ostler, D. Czempiel, T. Kähler, M. Brunner, S. Feussner, H. Wilhelm, D. Kranzfelder, M. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Original Article PURPOSE: Surgical documentation is an important yet time-consuming necessity in clinical routine. Beside its core function to transmit information about a surgery to other medical professionals, the surgical report has gained even more significance in terms of information extraction for scientific, administrative and judicial application. A possible basis for computer aided reporting is phase detection by convolutional neural networks (CNN). In this article we propose a workflow to generate operative notes based on the output of the TeCNO CNN. METHODS: Video recordings of 15 cholecystectomies were used for inference. The annotation of TeCNO was compared to that of an expert surgeon (HE) and the algorithm based annotation of a scientist (HA). The CNN output then was used to identify aberrance from standard course as basis for the final report. Moreover, we assessed the phenomenon of ‘phase flickering’ as clusters of incorrectly labeled frames and evaluated its usability. RESULTS: The accordance of the HE and CNN was 79.7% and that of HA and CNN 87.0%. ‘Phase flickering’ indicated an aberrant course with AUCs of 0.91 and 0.89 in ROC analysis regarding number and extend of concerned frames. Finally, we created operative notes based on a standard text, deviation alerts, and manual completion by the surgeon. CONCLUSION: Computer-aided documentation is a noteworthy use case for phase recognition in standardized surgery. The analysis of phase flickering in a CNN’s annotation has the potential of retrieving more information about the course of a particular procedure to complement an automated report. Springer International Publishing 2022-05-28 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9515052/ /pubmed/35643827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02680-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Berlet, M. Vogel, T. Ostler, D. Czempiel, T. Kähler, M. Brunner, S. Feussner, H. Wilhelm, D. Kranzfelder, M. Surgical reporting for laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on phase annotation by a convolutional neural network (CNN) and the phenomenon of phase flickering: a proof of concept |
title | Surgical reporting for laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on phase annotation by a convolutional neural network (CNN) and the phenomenon of phase flickering: a proof of concept |
title_full | Surgical reporting for laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on phase annotation by a convolutional neural network (CNN) and the phenomenon of phase flickering: a proof of concept |
title_fullStr | Surgical reporting for laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on phase annotation by a convolutional neural network (CNN) and the phenomenon of phase flickering: a proof of concept |
title_full_unstemmed | Surgical reporting for laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on phase annotation by a convolutional neural network (CNN) and the phenomenon of phase flickering: a proof of concept |
title_short | Surgical reporting for laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on phase annotation by a convolutional neural network (CNN) and the phenomenon of phase flickering: a proof of concept |
title_sort | surgical reporting for laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on phase annotation by a convolutional neural network (cnn) and the phenomenon of phase flickering: a proof of concept |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9515052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35643827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02680-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT berletm surgicalreportingforlaparoscopiccholecystectomybasedonphaseannotationbyaconvolutionalneuralnetworkcnnandthephenomenonofphaseflickeringaproofofconcept AT vogelt surgicalreportingforlaparoscopiccholecystectomybasedonphaseannotationbyaconvolutionalneuralnetworkcnnandthephenomenonofphaseflickeringaproofofconcept AT ostlerd surgicalreportingforlaparoscopiccholecystectomybasedonphaseannotationbyaconvolutionalneuralnetworkcnnandthephenomenonofphaseflickeringaproofofconcept AT czempielt surgicalreportingforlaparoscopiccholecystectomybasedonphaseannotationbyaconvolutionalneuralnetworkcnnandthephenomenonofphaseflickeringaproofofconcept AT kahlerm surgicalreportingforlaparoscopiccholecystectomybasedonphaseannotationbyaconvolutionalneuralnetworkcnnandthephenomenonofphaseflickeringaproofofconcept AT brunners surgicalreportingforlaparoscopiccholecystectomybasedonphaseannotationbyaconvolutionalneuralnetworkcnnandthephenomenonofphaseflickeringaproofofconcept AT feussnerh surgicalreportingforlaparoscopiccholecystectomybasedonphaseannotationbyaconvolutionalneuralnetworkcnnandthephenomenonofphaseflickeringaproofofconcept AT wilhelmd surgicalreportingforlaparoscopiccholecystectomybasedonphaseannotationbyaconvolutionalneuralnetworkcnnandthephenomenonofphaseflickeringaproofofconcept AT kranzfelderm surgicalreportingforlaparoscopiccholecystectomybasedonphaseannotationbyaconvolutionalneuralnetworkcnnandthephenomenonofphaseflickeringaproofofconcept |