Cargando…
Fragile X-associated tremor ataxia syndrome rating scale: Revision and content validity using a mixed method approach
BACKGROUND: The original Fragile X-associated Tremor Ataxia Syndrome Rating Scale (FXTAS-RS) contained 61 items, some requiring modifications to better meet recommendations for patient-focused rating scale development. PURPOSE: Provide initial validation of a revised version of the FXTAS-RS for moto...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9515309/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36188408 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.977380 |
_version_ | 1784798450819268608 |
---|---|
author | Tosin, Michelle H. S. Stebbins, Glenn T. Goetz, Christopher G. Hagerman, Randi J. Hessl, David Zolecki, Melissa A. Todd, Peter K. Leehey, Maureen A. Hall, Deborah A. |
author_facet | Tosin, Michelle H. S. Stebbins, Glenn T. Goetz, Christopher G. Hagerman, Randi J. Hessl, David Zolecki, Melissa A. Todd, Peter K. Leehey, Maureen A. Hall, Deborah A. |
author_sort | Tosin, Michelle H. S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The original Fragile X-associated Tremor Ataxia Syndrome Rating Scale (FXTAS-RS) contained 61 items, some requiring modifications to better meet recommendations for patient-focused rating scale development. PURPOSE: Provide initial validation of a revised version of the FXTAS-RS for motor signs. METHOD: We conducted a two-phase mixed-method approach. In Phase 1, revision, we implemented a Delphi technique identifying pertinent domains/subdomains and developing items through expert consensus. In Phase 2, content validation, we conducted cognitive pretesting assessing comprehensibility, comprehensiveness, and relevance of items to FXTAS motor signs. RESULTS: After five rounds of Delphi panel and two rounds of cognitive pretesting, the revised version of the FXTAS-RS was established with 18 items covering five domains and 13 subdomains of motor signs. Cognitive pretesting revealed adequate content validity for the assessment of FXTAS motor signs. CONCLUSION: The revised FXTAS-RS has been successfully validated for content and it is now ready for large-scale field validation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9515309 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95153092022-09-29 Fragile X-associated tremor ataxia syndrome rating scale: Revision and content validity using a mixed method approach Tosin, Michelle H. S. Stebbins, Glenn T. Goetz, Christopher G. Hagerman, Randi J. Hessl, David Zolecki, Melissa A. Todd, Peter K. Leehey, Maureen A. Hall, Deborah A. Front Neurol Neurology BACKGROUND: The original Fragile X-associated Tremor Ataxia Syndrome Rating Scale (FXTAS-RS) contained 61 items, some requiring modifications to better meet recommendations for patient-focused rating scale development. PURPOSE: Provide initial validation of a revised version of the FXTAS-RS for motor signs. METHOD: We conducted a two-phase mixed-method approach. In Phase 1, revision, we implemented a Delphi technique identifying pertinent domains/subdomains and developing items through expert consensus. In Phase 2, content validation, we conducted cognitive pretesting assessing comprehensibility, comprehensiveness, and relevance of items to FXTAS motor signs. RESULTS: After five rounds of Delphi panel and two rounds of cognitive pretesting, the revised version of the FXTAS-RS was established with 18 items covering five domains and 13 subdomains of motor signs. Cognitive pretesting revealed adequate content validity for the assessment of FXTAS motor signs. CONCLUSION: The revised FXTAS-RS has been successfully validated for content and it is now ready for large-scale field validation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9515309/ /pubmed/36188408 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.977380 Text en Copyright © 2022 Tosin, Stebbins, Goetz, Hagerman, Hessl, Zolecki, Todd, Leehey and Hall. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Tosin, Michelle H. S. Stebbins, Glenn T. Goetz, Christopher G. Hagerman, Randi J. Hessl, David Zolecki, Melissa A. Todd, Peter K. Leehey, Maureen A. Hall, Deborah A. Fragile X-associated tremor ataxia syndrome rating scale: Revision and content validity using a mixed method approach |
title | Fragile X-associated tremor ataxia syndrome rating scale: Revision and content validity using a mixed method approach |
title_full | Fragile X-associated tremor ataxia syndrome rating scale: Revision and content validity using a mixed method approach |
title_fullStr | Fragile X-associated tremor ataxia syndrome rating scale: Revision and content validity using a mixed method approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Fragile X-associated tremor ataxia syndrome rating scale: Revision and content validity using a mixed method approach |
title_short | Fragile X-associated tremor ataxia syndrome rating scale: Revision and content validity using a mixed method approach |
title_sort | fragile x-associated tremor ataxia syndrome rating scale: revision and content validity using a mixed method approach |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9515309/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36188408 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.977380 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tosinmichellehs fragilexassociatedtremorataxiasyndromeratingscalerevisionandcontentvalidityusingamixedmethodapproach AT stebbinsglennt fragilexassociatedtremorataxiasyndromeratingscalerevisionandcontentvalidityusingamixedmethodapproach AT goetzchristopherg fragilexassociatedtremorataxiasyndromeratingscalerevisionandcontentvalidityusingamixedmethodapproach AT hagermanrandij fragilexassociatedtremorataxiasyndromeratingscalerevisionandcontentvalidityusingamixedmethodapproach AT hessldavid fragilexassociatedtremorataxiasyndromeratingscalerevisionandcontentvalidityusingamixedmethodapproach AT zoleckimelissaa fragilexassociatedtremorataxiasyndromeratingscalerevisionandcontentvalidityusingamixedmethodapproach AT toddpeterk fragilexassociatedtremorataxiasyndromeratingscalerevisionandcontentvalidityusingamixedmethodapproach AT leeheymaureena fragilexassociatedtremorataxiasyndromeratingscalerevisionandcontentvalidityusingamixedmethodapproach AT halldeboraha fragilexassociatedtremorataxiasyndromeratingscalerevisionandcontentvalidityusingamixedmethodapproach |