Cargando…

Fragile X-associated tremor ataxia syndrome rating scale: Revision and content validity using a mixed method approach

BACKGROUND: The original Fragile X-associated Tremor Ataxia Syndrome Rating Scale (FXTAS-RS) contained 61 items, some requiring modifications to better meet recommendations for patient-focused rating scale development. PURPOSE: Provide initial validation of a revised version of the FXTAS-RS for moto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tosin, Michelle H. S., Stebbins, Glenn T., Goetz, Christopher G., Hagerman, Randi J., Hessl, David, Zolecki, Melissa A., Todd, Peter K., Leehey, Maureen A., Hall, Deborah A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9515309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36188408
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.977380
_version_ 1784798450819268608
author Tosin, Michelle H. S.
Stebbins, Glenn T.
Goetz, Christopher G.
Hagerman, Randi J.
Hessl, David
Zolecki, Melissa A.
Todd, Peter K.
Leehey, Maureen A.
Hall, Deborah A.
author_facet Tosin, Michelle H. S.
Stebbins, Glenn T.
Goetz, Christopher G.
Hagerman, Randi J.
Hessl, David
Zolecki, Melissa A.
Todd, Peter K.
Leehey, Maureen A.
Hall, Deborah A.
author_sort Tosin, Michelle H. S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The original Fragile X-associated Tremor Ataxia Syndrome Rating Scale (FXTAS-RS) contained 61 items, some requiring modifications to better meet recommendations for patient-focused rating scale development. PURPOSE: Provide initial validation of a revised version of the FXTAS-RS for motor signs. METHOD: We conducted a two-phase mixed-method approach. In Phase 1, revision, we implemented a Delphi technique identifying pertinent domains/subdomains and developing items through expert consensus. In Phase 2, content validation, we conducted cognitive pretesting assessing comprehensibility, comprehensiveness, and relevance of items to FXTAS motor signs. RESULTS: After five rounds of Delphi panel and two rounds of cognitive pretesting, the revised version of the FXTAS-RS was established with 18 items covering five domains and 13 subdomains of motor signs. Cognitive pretesting revealed adequate content validity for the assessment of FXTAS motor signs. CONCLUSION: The revised FXTAS-RS has been successfully validated for content and it is now ready for large-scale field validation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9515309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95153092022-09-29 Fragile X-associated tremor ataxia syndrome rating scale: Revision and content validity using a mixed method approach Tosin, Michelle H. S. Stebbins, Glenn T. Goetz, Christopher G. Hagerman, Randi J. Hessl, David Zolecki, Melissa A. Todd, Peter K. Leehey, Maureen A. Hall, Deborah A. Front Neurol Neurology BACKGROUND: The original Fragile X-associated Tremor Ataxia Syndrome Rating Scale (FXTAS-RS) contained 61 items, some requiring modifications to better meet recommendations for patient-focused rating scale development. PURPOSE: Provide initial validation of a revised version of the FXTAS-RS for motor signs. METHOD: We conducted a two-phase mixed-method approach. In Phase 1, revision, we implemented a Delphi technique identifying pertinent domains/subdomains and developing items through expert consensus. In Phase 2, content validation, we conducted cognitive pretesting assessing comprehensibility, comprehensiveness, and relevance of items to FXTAS motor signs. RESULTS: After five rounds of Delphi panel and two rounds of cognitive pretesting, the revised version of the FXTAS-RS was established with 18 items covering five domains and 13 subdomains of motor signs. Cognitive pretesting revealed adequate content validity for the assessment of FXTAS motor signs. CONCLUSION: The revised FXTAS-RS has been successfully validated for content and it is now ready for large-scale field validation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9515309/ /pubmed/36188408 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.977380 Text en Copyright © 2022 Tosin, Stebbins, Goetz, Hagerman, Hessl, Zolecki, Todd, Leehey and Hall. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Tosin, Michelle H. S.
Stebbins, Glenn T.
Goetz, Christopher G.
Hagerman, Randi J.
Hessl, David
Zolecki, Melissa A.
Todd, Peter K.
Leehey, Maureen A.
Hall, Deborah A.
Fragile X-associated tremor ataxia syndrome rating scale: Revision and content validity using a mixed method approach
title Fragile X-associated tremor ataxia syndrome rating scale: Revision and content validity using a mixed method approach
title_full Fragile X-associated tremor ataxia syndrome rating scale: Revision and content validity using a mixed method approach
title_fullStr Fragile X-associated tremor ataxia syndrome rating scale: Revision and content validity using a mixed method approach
title_full_unstemmed Fragile X-associated tremor ataxia syndrome rating scale: Revision and content validity using a mixed method approach
title_short Fragile X-associated tremor ataxia syndrome rating scale: Revision and content validity using a mixed method approach
title_sort fragile x-associated tremor ataxia syndrome rating scale: revision and content validity using a mixed method approach
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9515309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36188408
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.977380
work_keys_str_mv AT tosinmichellehs fragilexassociatedtremorataxiasyndromeratingscalerevisionandcontentvalidityusingamixedmethodapproach
AT stebbinsglennt fragilexassociatedtremorataxiasyndromeratingscalerevisionandcontentvalidityusingamixedmethodapproach
AT goetzchristopherg fragilexassociatedtremorataxiasyndromeratingscalerevisionandcontentvalidityusingamixedmethodapproach
AT hagermanrandij fragilexassociatedtremorataxiasyndromeratingscalerevisionandcontentvalidityusingamixedmethodapproach
AT hessldavid fragilexassociatedtremorataxiasyndromeratingscalerevisionandcontentvalidityusingamixedmethodapproach
AT zoleckimelissaa fragilexassociatedtremorataxiasyndromeratingscalerevisionandcontentvalidityusingamixedmethodapproach
AT toddpeterk fragilexassociatedtremorataxiasyndromeratingscalerevisionandcontentvalidityusingamixedmethodapproach
AT leeheymaureena fragilexassociatedtremorataxiasyndromeratingscalerevisionandcontentvalidityusingamixedmethodapproach
AT halldeboraha fragilexassociatedtremorataxiasyndromeratingscalerevisionandcontentvalidityusingamixedmethodapproach