Cargando…

Natural language processing in clinical neuroscience and psychiatry: A review

Natural language processing (NLP) is rapidly becoming an important topic in the medical community. The ability to automatically analyze any type of medical document could be the key factor to fully exploit the data it contains. Cutting-edge artificial intelligence (AI) architectures, particularly ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crema, Claudio, Attardi, Giuseppe, Sartiano, Daniele, Redolfi, Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9515453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36186874
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.946387
_version_ 1784798484438712320
author Crema, Claudio
Attardi, Giuseppe
Sartiano, Daniele
Redolfi, Alberto
author_facet Crema, Claudio
Attardi, Giuseppe
Sartiano, Daniele
Redolfi, Alberto
author_sort Crema, Claudio
collection PubMed
description Natural language processing (NLP) is rapidly becoming an important topic in the medical community. The ability to automatically analyze any type of medical document could be the key factor to fully exploit the data it contains. Cutting-edge artificial intelligence (AI) architectures, particularly machine learning and deep learning, have begun to be applied to this topic and have yielded promising results. We conducted a literature search for 1,024 papers that used NLP technology in neuroscience and psychiatry from 2010 to early 2022. After a selection process, 115 papers were evaluated. Each publication was classified into one of three categories: information extraction, classification, and data inference. Automated understanding of clinical reports in electronic health records has the potential to improve healthcare delivery. Overall, the performance of NLP applications is high, with an average F1-score and AUC above 85%. We also derived a composite measure in the form of Z-scores to better compare the performance of NLP models and their different classes as a whole. No statistical differences were found in the unbiased comparison. Strong asymmetry between English and non-English models, difficulty in obtaining high-quality annotated data, and train biases causing low generalizability are the main limitations. This review suggests that NLP could be an effective tool to help clinicians gain insights from medical reports, clinical research forms, and more, making NLP an effective tool to improve the quality of healthcare services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9515453
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95154532022-09-29 Natural language processing in clinical neuroscience and psychiatry: A review Crema, Claudio Attardi, Giuseppe Sartiano, Daniele Redolfi, Alberto Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Natural language processing (NLP) is rapidly becoming an important topic in the medical community. The ability to automatically analyze any type of medical document could be the key factor to fully exploit the data it contains. Cutting-edge artificial intelligence (AI) architectures, particularly machine learning and deep learning, have begun to be applied to this topic and have yielded promising results. We conducted a literature search for 1,024 papers that used NLP technology in neuroscience and psychiatry from 2010 to early 2022. After a selection process, 115 papers were evaluated. Each publication was classified into one of three categories: information extraction, classification, and data inference. Automated understanding of clinical reports in electronic health records has the potential to improve healthcare delivery. Overall, the performance of NLP applications is high, with an average F1-score and AUC above 85%. We also derived a composite measure in the form of Z-scores to better compare the performance of NLP models and their different classes as a whole. No statistical differences were found in the unbiased comparison. Strong asymmetry between English and non-English models, difficulty in obtaining high-quality annotated data, and train biases causing low generalizability are the main limitations. This review suggests that NLP could be an effective tool to help clinicians gain insights from medical reports, clinical research forms, and more, making NLP an effective tool to improve the quality of healthcare services. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9515453/ /pubmed/36186874 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.946387 Text en Copyright © 2022 Crema, Attardi, Sartiano and Redolfi. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Crema, Claudio
Attardi, Giuseppe
Sartiano, Daniele
Redolfi, Alberto
Natural language processing in clinical neuroscience and psychiatry: A review
title Natural language processing in clinical neuroscience and psychiatry: A review
title_full Natural language processing in clinical neuroscience and psychiatry: A review
title_fullStr Natural language processing in clinical neuroscience and psychiatry: A review
title_full_unstemmed Natural language processing in clinical neuroscience and psychiatry: A review
title_short Natural language processing in clinical neuroscience and psychiatry: A review
title_sort natural language processing in clinical neuroscience and psychiatry: a review
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9515453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36186874
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.946387
work_keys_str_mv AT cremaclaudio naturallanguageprocessinginclinicalneuroscienceandpsychiatryareview
AT attardigiuseppe naturallanguageprocessinginclinicalneuroscienceandpsychiatryareview
AT sartianodaniele naturallanguageprocessinginclinicalneuroscienceandpsychiatryareview
AT redolfialberto naturallanguageprocessinginclinicalneuroscienceandpsychiatryareview