Cargando…

Novel cephalometric parameters for the assessment of vertical skeletal dysplasia

INTRODUCTION: The accurate diagnosis of vertical skeletal abnormalities presents several challenges. Specific cephalometric parameters can be effectively used for this purpose; however, their diagnostic utility has not been fully ascertained. This study examined the effectiveness of two novel cephal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gandhi, Kaveri Kranti, Rai, Anshu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9515554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36188199
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_32_22
_version_ 1784798509414744064
author Gandhi, Kaveri Kranti
Rai, Anshu
author_facet Gandhi, Kaveri Kranti
Rai, Anshu
author_sort Gandhi, Kaveri Kranti
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The accurate diagnosis of vertical skeletal abnormalities presents several challenges. Specific cephalometric parameters can be effectively used for this purpose; however, their diagnostic utility has not been fully ascertained. This study examined the effectiveness of two novel cephalometric parameters in diagnosing vertical dysplasia. METHODS: Orthodontic patients were divided into three study groups: average growth group (AGG), horizontal growth group (HGG), and vertical growth group (VGG). The efficacies of the sum of the angles (maxillary, mandibular, and ramal) and the height ratio (lower anterior facial height [LAFH]/upper anterior facial height [UAFH]) in identifying the different growth patterns were examined. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to quantitatively assess diagnostic precision. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients were included and divided equally among the 3 study groups. The ramal and mandibular angles varied across AGG, HGG, and VGG; however, the maxillary angle and the sum of these three angles did not vary significantly. There was a significant difference in LAFH, UAFH, and their ratios among the three groups. The height ratio had a sensitivity of 88% and 92% for the diagnosis of VGG and HGG, respectively, with cutoff values of 46 and 34, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The height ratio values varied considerably according to facial growth patterns, suggesting its utility as a diagnostic tool for skeletal dysplasia with greater reliability for positive treatment outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9515554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95155542022-09-29 Novel cephalometric parameters for the assessment of vertical skeletal dysplasia Gandhi, Kaveri Kranti Rai, Anshu J Orthod Sci Original Article INTRODUCTION: The accurate diagnosis of vertical skeletal abnormalities presents several challenges. Specific cephalometric parameters can be effectively used for this purpose; however, their diagnostic utility has not been fully ascertained. This study examined the effectiveness of two novel cephalometric parameters in diagnosing vertical dysplasia. METHODS: Orthodontic patients were divided into three study groups: average growth group (AGG), horizontal growth group (HGG), and vertical growth group (VGG). The efficacies of the sum of the angles (maxillary, mandibular, and ramal) and the height ratio (lower anterior facial height [LAFH]/upper anterior facial height [UAFH]) in identifying the different growth patterns were examined. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to quantitatively assess diagnostic precision. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients were included and divided equally among the 3 study groups. The ramal and mandibular angles varied across AGG, HGG, and VGG; however, the maxillary angle and the sum of these three angles did not vary significantly. There was a significant difference in LAFH, UAFH, and their ratios among the three groups. The height ratio had a sensitivity of 88% and 92% for the diagnosis of VGG and HGG, respectively, with cutoff values of 46 and 34, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The height ratio values varied considerably according to facial growth patterns, suggesting its utility as a diagnostic tool for skeletal dysplasia with greater reliability for positive treatment outcomes. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9515554/ /pubmed/36188199 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_32_22 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Orthodontic Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gandhi, Kaveri Kranti
Rai, Anshu
Novel cephalometric parameters for the assessment of vertical skeletal dysplasia
title Novel cephalometric parameters for the assessment of vertical skeletal dysplasia
title_full Novel cephalometric parameters for the assessment of vertical skeletal dysplasia
title_fullStr Novel cephalometric parameters for the assessment of vertical skeletal dysplasia
title_full_unstemmed Novel cephalometric parameters for the assessment of vertical skeletal dysplasia
title_short Novel cephalometric parameters for the assessment of vertical skeletal dysplasia
title_sort novel cephalometric parameters for the assessment of vertical skeletal dysplasia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9515554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36188199
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_32_22
work_keys_str_mv AT gandhikaverikranti novelcephalometricparametersfortheassessmentofverticalskeletaldysplasia
AT raianshu novelcephalometricparametersfortheassessmentofverticalskeletaldysplasia