Cargando…
Novel cephalometric parameters for the assessment of vertical skeletal dysplasia
INTRODUCTION: The accurate diagnosis of vertical skeletal abnormalities presents several challenges. Specific cephalometric parameters can be effectively used for this purpose; however, their diagnostic utility has not been fully ascertained. This study examined the effectiveness of two novel cephal...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9515554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36188199 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_32_22 |
_version_ | 1784798509414744064 |
---|---|
author | Gandhi, Kaveri Kranti Rai, Anshu |
author_facet | Gandhi, Kaveri Kranti Rai, Anshu |
author_sort | Gandhi, Kaveri Kranti |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The accurate diagnosis of vertical skeletal abnormalities presents several challenges. Specific cephalometric parameters can be effectively used for this purpose; however, their diagnostic utility has not been fully ascertained. This study examined the effectiveness of two novel cephalometric parameters in diagnosing vertical dysplasia. METHODS: Orthodontic patients were divided into three study groups: average growth group (AGG), horizontal growth group (HGG), and vertical growth group (VGG). The efficacies of the sum of the angles (maxillary, mandibular, and ramal) and the height ratio (lower anterior facial height [LAFH]/upper anterior facial height [UAFH]) in identifying the different growth patterns were examined. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to quantitatively assess diagnostic precision. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients were included and divided equally among the 3 study groups. The ramal and mandibular angles varied across AGG, HGG, and VGG; however, the maxillary angle and the sum of these three angles did not vary significantly. There was a significant difference in LAFH, UAFH, and their ratios among the three groups. The height ratio had a sensitivity of 88% and 92% for the diagnosis of VGG and HGG, respectively, with cutoff values of 46 and 34, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The height ratio values varied considerably according to facial growth patterns, suggesting its utility as a diagnostic tool for skeletal dysplasia with greater reliability for positive treatment outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9515554 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95155542022-09-29 Novel cephalometric parameters for the assessment of vertical skeletal dysplasia Gandhi, Kaveri Kranti Rai, Anshu J Orthod Sci Original Article INTRODUCTION: The accurate diagnosis of vertical skeletal abnormalities presents several challenges. Specific cephalometric parameters can be effectively used for this purpose; however, their diagnostic utility has not been fully ascertained. This study examined the effectiveness of two novel cephalometric parameters in diagnosing vertical dysplasia. METHODS: Orthodontic patients were divided into three study groups: average growth group (AGG), horizontal growth group (HGG), and vertical growth group (VGG). The efficacies of the sum of the angles (maxillary, mandibular, and ramal) and the height ratio (lower anterior facial height [LAFH]/upper anterior facial height [UAFH]) in identifying the different growth patterns were examined. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to quantitatively assess diagnostic precision. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients were included and divided equally among the 3 study groups. The ramal and mandibular angles varied across AGG, HGG, and VGG; however, the maxillary angle and the sum of these three angles did not vary significantly. There was a significant difference in LAFH, UAFH, and their ratios among the three groups. The height ratio had a sensitivity of 88% and 92% for the diagnosis of VGG and HGG, respectively, with cutoff values of 46 and 34, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The height ratio values varied considerably according to facial growth patterns, suggesting its utility as a diagnostic tool for skeletal dysplasia with greater reliability for positive treatment outcomes. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9515554/ /pubmed/36188199 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_32_22 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Orthodontic Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Gandhi, Kaveri Kranti Rai, Anshu Novel cephalometric parameters for the assessment of vertical skeletal dysplasia |
title | Novel cephalometric parameters for the assessment of vertical skeletal dysplasia |
title_full | Novel cephalometric parameters for the assessment of vertical skeletal dysplasia |
title_fullStr | Novel cephalometric parameters for the assessment of vertical skeletal dysplasia |
title_full_unstemmed | Novel cephalometric parameters for the assessment of vertical skeletal dysplasia |
title_short | Novel cephalometric parameters for the assessment of vertical skeletal dysplasia |
title_sort | novel cephalometric parameters for the assessment of vertical skeletal dysplasia |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9515554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36188199 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_32_22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gandhikaverikranti novelcephalometricparametersfortheassessmentofverticalskeletaldysplasia AT raianshu novelcephalometricparametersfortheassessmentofverticalskeletaldysplasia |