Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A modelling study
BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) is a method of CPR that passes the patient’s blood through an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) device to provide mechanical haemodynamic and oxygenation support in cardiac arrest patients who are not responsive to conventiona...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9515594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36187433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100309 |
_version_ | 1784798519429693440 |
---|---|
author | Doan, Tan N Rashford, Stephen Pincus, Jason Bosley, Emma |
author_facet | Doan, Tan N Rashford, Stephen Pincus, Jason Bosley, Emma |
author_sort | Doan, Tan N |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) is a method of CPR that passes the patient’s blood through an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) device to provide mechanical haemodynamic and oxygenation support in cardiac arrest patients who are not responsive to conventional CPR (C-CPR). E-CPR is being adopted rapidly worldwide despite the absence of high quality trial data and its substantial cost. Published cost-effectiveness data for E-CPR are scarce. METHODS: We developed a mathematical model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of E-CPR relative to C-CPR in adult patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The model was a combination of a decision tree for the acute treatment phase and a Markov model for long-term periods. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated from the Australian health system perspective over lifetime. Cost-effectiveness was expressed as Australian dollars (AUD, 2021 value) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Variables were parameterised using published data. Probabilistic and univariate sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of E-CPR was estimated to be AUD 45,716 per QALY gained over lifetime (95% uncertainty range 22,102–292,904). The cost-effectiveness of E-CPR was most sensitive to the outcome of the therapy. CONCLUSION: E-CPR has median ICER that is below common accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds. Local factors within the health care system need to be considered to determine the feasibility of implementing an effective E-CPR program. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9515594 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95155942022-09-29 Cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A modelling study Doan, Tan N Rashford, Stephen Pincus, Jason Bosley, Emma Resusc Plus Clinical Paper BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) is a method of CPR that passes the patient’s blood through an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) device to provide mechanical haemodynamic and oxygenation support in cardiac arrest patients who are not responsive to conventional CPR (C-CPR). E-CPR is being adopted rapidly worldwide despite the absence of high quality trial data and its substantial cost. Published cost-effectiveness data for E-CPR are scarce. METHODS: We developed a mathematical model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of E-CPR relative to C-CPR in adult patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The model was a combination of a decision tree for the acute treatment phase and a Markov model for long-term periods. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated from the Australian health system perspective over lifetime. Cost-effectiveness was expressed as Australian dollars (AUD, 2021 value) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Variables were parameterised using published data. Probabilistic and univariate sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of E-CPR was estimated to be AUD 45,716 per QALY gained over lifetime (95% uncertainty range 22,102–292,904). The cost-effectiveness of E-CPR was most sensitive to the outcome of the therapy. CONCLUSION: E-CPR has median ICER that is below common accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds. Local factors within the health care system need to be considered to determine the feasibility of implementing an effective E-CPR program. Elsevier 2022-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9515594/ /pubmed/36187433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100309 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Clinical Paper Doan, Tan N Rashford, Stephen Pincus, Jason Bosley, Emma Cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A modelling study |
title | Cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A modelling study |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A modelling study |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A modelling study |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A modelling study |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A modelling study |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a modelling study |
topic | Clinical Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9515594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36187433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100309 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT doantann costeffectivenessofextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationforrefractoryoutofhospitalcardiacarrestamodellingstudy AT rashfordstephen costeffectivenessofextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationforrefractoryoutofhospitalcardiacarrestamodellingstudy AT pincusjason costeffectivenessofextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationforrefractoryoutofhospitalcardiacarrestamodellingstudy AT bosleyemma costeffectivenessofextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationforrefractoryoutofhospitalcardiacarrestamodellingstudy |