Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A modelling study

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) is a method of CPR that passes the patient’s blood through an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) device to provide mechanical haemodynamic and oxygenation support in cardiac arrest patients who are not responsive to conventiona...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doan, Tan N, Rashford, Stephen, Pincus, Jason, Bosley, Emma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9515594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36187433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100309
_version_ 1784798519429693440
author Doan, Tan N
Rashford, Stephen
Pincus, Jason
Bosley, Emma
author_facet Doan, Tan N
Rashford, Stephen
Pincus, Jason
Bosley, Emma
author_sort Doan, Tan N
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) is a method of CPR that passes the patient’s blood through an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) device to provide mechanical haemodynamic and oxygenation support in cardiac arrest patients who are not responsive to conventional CPR (C-CPR). E-CPR is being adopted rapidly worldwide despite the absence of high quality trial data and its substantial cost. Published cost-effectiveness data for E-CPR are scarce. METHODS: We developed a mathematical model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of E-CPR relative to C-CPR in adult patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The model was a combination of a decision tree for the acute treatment phase and a Markov model for long-term periods. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated from the Australian health system perspective over lifetime. Cost-effectiveness was expressed as Australian dollars (AUD, 2021 value) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Variables were parameterised using published data. Probabilistic and univariate sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of E-CPR was estimated to be AUD 45,716 per QALY gained over lifetime (95% uncertainty range 22,102–292,904). The cost-effectiveness of E-CPR was most sensitive to the outcome of the therapy. CONCLUSION: E-CPR has median ICER that is below common accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds. Local factors within the health care system need to be considered to determine the feasibility of implementing an effective E-CPR program.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9515594
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95155942022-09-29 Cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A modelling study Doan, Tan N Rashford, Stephen Pincus, Jason Bosley, Emma Resusc Plus Clinical Paper BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) is a method of CPR that passes the patient’s blood through an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) device to provide mechanical haemodynamic and oxygenation support in cardiac arrest patients who are not responsive to conventional CPR (C-CPR). E-CPR is being adopted rapidly worldwide despite the absence of high quality trial data and its substantial cost. Published cost-effectiveness data for E-CPR are scarce. METHODS: We developed a mathematical model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of E-CPR relative to C-CPR in adult patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The model was a combination of a decision tree for the acute treatment phase and a Markov model for long-term periods. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated from the Australian health system perspective over lifetime. Cost-effectiveness was expressed as Australian dollars (AUD, 2021 value) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Variables were parameterised using published data. Probabilistic and univariate sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of E-CPR was estimated to be AUD 45,716 per QALY gained over lifetime (95% uncertainty range 22,102–292,904). The cost-effectiveness of E-CPR was most sensitive to the outcome of the therapy. CONCLUSION: E-CPR has median ICER that is below common accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds. Local factors within the health care system need to be considered to determine the feasibility of implementing an effective E-CPR program. Elsevier 2022-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9515594/ /pubmed/36187433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100309 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Clinical Paper
Doan, Tan N
Rashford, Stephen
Pincus, Jason
Bosley, Emma
Cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A modelling study
title Cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A modelling study
title_full Cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A modelling study
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A modelling study
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A modelling study
title_short Cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A modelling study
title_sort cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a modelling study
topic Clinical Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9515594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36187433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100309
work_keys_str_mv AT doantann costeffectivenessofextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationforrefractoryoutofhospitalcardiacarrestamodellingstudy
AT rashfordstephen costeffectivenessofextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationforrefractoryoutofhospitalcardiacarrestamodellingstudy
AT pincusjason costeffectivenessofextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationforrefractoryoutofhospitalcardiacarrestamodellingstudy
AT bosleyemma costeffectivenessofextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationforrefractoryoutofhospitalcardiacarrestamodellingstudy