Cargando…
S8.1b Is a search and destroy strategy still feasible for Candida auris in South Africa?
S8.1 TACKLING CANDIDA AURIS IN RESOURCE-LIMITED SETTINGS, SEPTEMBER 23, 2022, 3:00 PM - 4:30 PM: : Candida auris was prospectively detected as a healthcare-associated pathogen in South Africa in 2014. However, a retrospective review of a culture collection from national laboratory-based surveilla...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9515919/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mmy/myac072.S8.1b |
_version_ | 1784798598059261952 |
---|---|
author | Govender, Nelesh |
author_facet | Govender, Nelesh |
author_sort | Govender, Nelesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | S8.1 TACKLING CANDIDA AURIS IN RESOURCE-LIMITED SETTINGS, SEPTEMBER 23, 2022, 3:00 PM - 4:30 PM: : Candida auris was prospectively detected as a healthcare-associated pathogen in South Africa in 2014. However, a retrospective review of a culture collection from national laboratory-based surveillance for Candidaemia in 2009-10 showed that earlier cases had been missed owing to species misidentification. National surveillance, which was repeated during 2016-17, revealed that C. auris caused >10% of cases of Candidaemia in South Africa, with most (86%) cases detected in the Gauteng Province. We recommended all hospitals to passively monitor cases of C. auris disease and colonization by each maintaining a line list of culture-confirmed cases. Facilities were thus classified into three tiers. Tier 1 (‘green status’) included facilities with no prior known cases. Such facilities were requested to report their first cases for urgent intervention. This included active colonization surveys, isolation and/or cohorts of infected or colonized patients as well as intensified infection prevention and control and antifungal stewardship activities. Tier 2 (‘orange status’) included facilities with sporadic cases defined arbitrarily as fewer than 12 cases in the past 6 months and/or fewer than three units affected. Such facilities were requested to report any increase in the number of cases compared with a baseline, clinical units affected for the first time, or apparent case clustering within the facility for investigation. Tier 3 (‘red status’) included facilities with a relative endemicity defined as >12 cases and/or >3 units with cases in the last 6 months. Tier 3 facilities were only requested to report increases over a baseline or apparent clustering within the facility. Owing to limited resources, colonization screening of newly-admitted patients was not recommended in acute-care facilities in South Africa. During 2019-21, the proportion attributable to C. auris increased even further to 25% (of 12 959 national cases of Candidaemia), with a concomitant reduction in cases caused by C. parapsilosis. This suggested a concerning replacement of multidrug-resistant C. auris in an ecological healthcare niche previously occupied by azole-resistant C. parapsilosis. An epidemiological shift was also observed with an expanding number of acute healthcare facilities outside Gauteng Province reporting C. auris and large persistent healthcare-associated infection outbreaks in neonatal units, particularly in the under-resourced public health sector. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9515919 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95159192022-09-28 S8.1b Is a search and destroy strategy still feasible for Candida auris in South Africa? Govender, Nelesh Med Mycol Oral Presentations S8.1 TACKLING CANDIDA AURIS IN RESOURCE-LIMITED SETTINGS, SEPTEMBER 23, 2022, 3:00 PM - 4:30 PM: : Candida auris was prospectively detected as a healthcare-associated pathogen in South Africa in 2014. However, a retrospective review of a culture collection from national laboratory-based surveillance for Candidaemia in 2009-10 showed that earlier cases had been missed owing to species misidentification. National surveillance, which was repeated during 2016-17, revealed that C. auris caused >10% of cases of Candidaemia in South Africa, with most (86%) cases detected in the Gauteng Province. We recommended all hospitals to passively monitor cases of C. auris disease and colonization by each maintaining a line list of culture-confirmed cases. Facilities were thus classified into three tiers. Tier 1 (‘green status’) included facilities with no prior known cases. Such facilities were requested to report their first cases for urgent intervention. This included active colonization surveys, isolation and/or cohorts of infected or colonized patients as well as intensified infection prevention and control and antifungal stewardship activities. Tier 2 (‘orange status’) included facilities with sporadic cases defined arbitrarily as fewer than 12 cases in the past 6 months and/or fewer than three units affected. Such facilities were requested to report any increase in the number of cases compared with a baseline, clinical units affected for the first time, or apparent case clustering within the facility for investigation. Tier 3 (‘red status’) included facilities with a relative endemicity defined as >12 cases and/or >3 units with cases in the last 6 months. Tier 3 facilities were only requested to report increases over a baseline or apparent clustering within the facility. Owing to limited resources, colonization screening of newly-admitted patients was not recommended in acute-care facilities in South Africa. During 2019-21, the proportion attributable to C. auris increased even further to 25% (of 12 959 national cases of Candidaemia), with a concomitant reduction in cases caused by C. parapsilosis. This suggested a concerning replacement of multidrug-resistant C. auris in an ecological healthcare niche previously occupied by azole-resistant C. parapsilosis. An epidemiological shift was also observed with an expanding number of acute healthcare facilities outside Gauteng Province reporting C. auris and large persistent healthcare-associated infection outbreaks in neonatal units, particularly in the under-resourced public health sector. Oxford University Press 2022-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9515919/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mmy/myac072.S8.1b Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The International Society for Human and Animal Mycology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Oral Presentations Govender, Nelesh S8.1b Is a search and destroy strategy still feasible for Candida auris in South Africa? |
title | S8.1b Is a search and destroy strategy still feasible for Candida auris in South Africa? |
title_full | S8.1b Is a search and destroy strategy still feasible for Candida auris in South Africa? |
title_fullStr | S8.1b Is a search and destroy strategy still feasible for Candida auris in South Africa? |
title_full_unstemmed | S8.1b Is a search and destroy strategy still feasible for Candida auris in South Africa? |
title_short | S8.1b Is a search and destroy strategy still feasible for Candida auris in South Africa? |
title_sort | s8.1b is a search and destroy strategy still feasible for candida auris in south africa? |
topic | Oral Presentations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9515919/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mmy/myac072.S8.1b |
work_keys_str_mv | AT govendernelesh s81bisasearchanddestroystrategystillfeasibleforcandidaaurisinsouthafrica |