Cargando…

Economic evaluation of endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke in Thailand

OBJECTIVES: Endovascular therapy (EVT) has proven to be clinically effective in treating large vessel occlusion acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), either alone or in combination with intravenous alteplase. Despite this, there is a limited evidence on the cost-effectiveness of EVT in Thailand and other lo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rattanavipapong, Waranya, Worakijthamrongchai, Thanaboon, Soboon, Budsadee, Luankongsomchit, Vilawan, Kongmuangpuk, Mananchaya, Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee, Teerawattananon, Yot, Nilanont, Yongchai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9516067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36167373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064403
_version_ 1784798630007275520
author Rattanavipapong, Waranya
Worakijthamrongchai, Thanaboon
Soboon, Budsadee
Luankongsomchit, Vilawan
Kongmuangpuk, Mananchaya
Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee
Teerawattananon, Yot
Nilanont, Yongchai
author_facet Rattanavipapong, Waranya
Worakijthamrongchai, Thanaboon
Soboon, Budsadee
Luankongsomchit, Vilawan
Kongmuangpuk, Mananchaya
Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee
Teerawattananon, Yot
Nilanont, Yongchai
author_sort Rattanavipapong, Waranya
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Endovascular therapy (EVT) has proven to be clinically effective in treating large vessel occlusion acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), either alone or in combination with intravenous alteplase. Despite this, there is a limited evidence on the cost-effectiveness of EVT in Thailand and other low-income and middle-income countries. This study aims to assess whether EVT is a cost-effective therapy for AIS, and to estimate the fiscal burden to the Thai government through budget impact analysis. METHODS: An economic evaluation was performed to compare AIS therapy with and without EVT from a societal perspective. The primary outcome was incremental cost-effectiveness per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Clinical parameters were derived from both national and international literature, while cost and utility data were collected locally. The analysis applied a cost-effectiveness threshold of 160 000 Baht (~$5000) per QALY, as set by the Thai government. RESULTS: Both EVT alone and EVT combined with intravenous alteplase, among patients who are ineligible and eligible for intravenous alteplase, respectively, improved health outcomes but incurred additional cost. The combination of EVT and intravenous alteplase was associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 146 800 THB per QALY gained compared with intravenous alteplase alone, and the ICER of EVT alone compared with supportive care among patients ineligible for intravenous alteplase was estimated at 115 000 THB per QALY gained. Sensitivity analysis showed that the price of EVT has the greatest impact on model outcomes. Over a time horizon of 5 years, the introduction of EVT into the Thai health benefit package would require an additional budget of 887 million THB, assuming 2000 new cases per year. CONCLUSIONS: EVT represents good value for money in the Thai context, both when provided to patients eligible for intravenous alteplase, and when provided alone to those who are ineligible for intravenous alteplase.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9516067
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95160672022-09-29 Economic evaluation of endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke in Thailand Rattanavipapong, Waranya Worakijthamrongchai, Thanaboon Soboon, Budsadee Luankongsomchit, Vilawan Kongmuangpuk, Mananchaya Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee Teerawattananon, Yot Nilanont, Yongchai BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVES: Endovascular therapy (EVT) has proven to be clinically effective in treating large vessel occlusion acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), either alone or in combination with intravenous alteplase. Despite this, there is a limited evidence on the cost-effectiveness of EVT in Thailand and other low-income and middle-income countries. This study aims to assess whether EVT is a cost-effective therapy for AIS, and to estimate the fiscal burden to the Thai government through budget impact analysis. METHODS: An economic evaluation was performed to compare AIS therapy with and without EVT from a societal perspective. The primary outcome was incremental cost-effectiveness per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Clinical parameters were derived from both national and international literature, while cost and utility data were collected locally. The analysis applied a cost-effectiveness threshold of 160 000 Baht (~$5000) per QALY, as set by the Thai government. RESULTS: Both EVT alone and EVT combined with intravenous alteplase, among patients who are ineligible and eligible for intravenous alteplase, respectively, improved health outcomes but incurred additional cost. The combination of EVT and intravenous alteplase was associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 146 800 THB per QALY gained compared with intravenous alteplase alone, and the ICER of EVT alone compared with supportive care among patients ineligible for intravenous alteplase was estimated at 115 000 THB per QALY gained. Sensitivity analysis showed that the price of EVT has the greatest impact on model outcomes. Over a time horizon of 5 years, the introduction of EVT into the Thai health benefit package would require an additional budget of 887 million THB, assuming 2000 new cases per year. CONCLUSIONS: EVT represents good value for money in the Thai context, both when provided to patients eligible for intravenous alteplase, and when provided alone to those who are ineligible for intravenous alteplase. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9516067/ /pubmed/36167373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064403 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Economics
Rattanavipapong, Waranya
Worakijthamrongchai, Thanaboon
Soboon, Budsadee
Luankongsomchit, Vilawan
Kongmuangpuk, Mananchaya
Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee
Teerawattananon, Yot
Nilanont, Yongchai
Economic evaluation of endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke in Thailand
title Economic evaluation of endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke in Thailand
title_full Economic evaluation of endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke in Thailand
title_fullStr Economic evaluation of endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke in Thailand
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluation of endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke in Thailand
title_short Economic evaluation of endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke in Thailand
title_sort economic evaluation of endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke in thailand
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9516067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36167373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064403
work_keys_str_mv AT rattanavipapongwaranya economicevaluationofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischaemicstrokeinthailand
AT worakijthamrongchaithanaboon economicevaluationofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischaemicstrokeinthailand
AT soboonbudsadee economicevaluationofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischaemicstrokeinthailand
AT luankongsomchitvilawan economicevaluationofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischaemicstrokeinthailand
AT kongmuangpukmananchaya economicevaluationofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischaemicstrokeinthailand
AT isaranuwatchaiwanrudee economicevaluationofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischaemicstrokeinthailand
AT teerawattananonyot economicevaluationofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischaemicstrokeinthailand
AT nilanontyongchai economicevaluationofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischaemicstrokeinthailand