Cargando…
Economic evaluation of endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke in Thailand
OBJECTIVES: Endovascular therapy (EVT) has proven to be clinically effective in treating large vessel occlusion acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), either alone or in combination with intravenous alteplase. Despite this, there is a limited evidence on the cost-effectiveness of EVT in Thailand and other lo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9516067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36167373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064403 |
_version_ | 1784798630007275520 |
---|---|
author | Rattanavipapong, Waranya Worakijthamrongchai, Thanaboon Soboon, Budsadee Luankongsomchit, Vilawan Kongmuangpuk, Mananchaya Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee Teerawattananon, Yot Nilanont, Yongchai |
author_facet | Rattanavipapong, Waranya Worakijthamrongchai, Thanaboon Soboon, Budsadee Luankongsomchit, Vilawan Kongmuangpuk, Mananchaya Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee Teerawattananon, Yot Nilanont, Yongchai |
author_sort | Rattanavipapong, Waranya |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Endovascular therapy (EVT) has proven to be clinically effective in treating large vessel occlusion acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), either alone or in combination with intravenous alteplase. Despite this, there is a limited evidence on the cost-effectiveness of EVT in Thailand and other low-income and middle-income countries. This study aims to assess whether EVT is a cost-effective therapy for AIS, and to estimate the fiscal burden to the Thai government through budget impact analysis. METHODS: An economic evaluation was performed to compare AIS therapy with and without EVT from a societal perspective. The primary outcome was incremental cost-effectiveness per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Clinical parameters were derived from both national and international literature, while cost and utility data were collected locally. The analysis applied a cost-effectiveness threshold of 160 000 Baht (~$5000) per QALY, as set by the Thai government. RESULTS: Both EVT alone and EVT combined with intravenous alteplase, among patients who are ineligible and eligible for intravenous alteplase, respectively, improved health outcomes but incurred additional cost. The combination of EVT and intravenous alteplase was associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 146 800 THB per QALY gained compared with intravenous alteplase alone, and the ICER of EVT alone compared with supportive care among patients ineligible for intravenous alteplase was estimated at 115 000 THB per QALY gained. Sensitivity analysis showed that the price of EVT has the greatest impact on model outcomes. Over a time horizon of 5 years, the introduction of EVT into the Thai health benefit package would require an additional budget of 887 million THB, assuming 2000 new cases per year. CONCLUSIONS: EVT represents good value for money in the Thai context, both when provided to patients eligible for intravenous alteplase, and when provided alone to those who are ineligible for intravenous alteplase. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9516067 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95160672022-09-29 Economic evaluation of endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke in Thailand Rattanavipapong, Waranya Worakijthamrongchai, Thanaboon Soboon, Budsadee Luankongsomchit, Vilawan Kongmuangpuk, Mananchaya Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee Teerawattananon, Yot Nilanont, Yongchai BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVES: Endovascular therapy (EVT) has proven to be clinically effective in treating large vessel occlusion acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), either alone or in combination with intravenous alteplase. Despite this, there is a limited evidence on the cost-effectiveness of EVT in Thailand and other low-income and middle-income countries. This study aims to assess whether EVT is a cost-effective therapy for AIS, and to estimate the fiscal burden to the Thai government through budget impact analysis. METHODS: An economic evaluation was performed to compare AIS therapy with and without EVT from a societal perspective. The primary outcome was incremental cost-effectiveness per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Clinical parameters were derived from both national and international literature, while cost and utility data were collected locally. The analysis applied a cost-effectiveness threshold of 160 000 Baht (~$5000) per QALY, as set by the Thai government. RESULTS: Both EVT alone and EVT combined with intravenous alteplase, among patients who are ineligible and eligible for intravenous alteplase, respectively, improved health outcomes but incurred additional cost. The combination of EVT and intravenous alteplase was associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 146 800 THB per QALY gained compared with intravenous alteplase alone, and the ICER of EVT alone compared with supportive care among patients ineligible for intravenous alteplase was estimated at 115 000 THB per QALY gained. Sensitivity analysis showed that the price of EVT has the greatest impact on model outcomes. Over a time horizon of 5 years, the introduction of EVT into the Thai health benefit package would require an additional budget of 887 million THB, assuming 2000 new cases per year. CONCLUSIONS: EVT represents good value for money in the Thai context, both when provided to patients eligible for intravenous alteplase, and when provided alone to those who are ineligible for intravenous alteplase. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9516067/ /pubmed/36167373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064403 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Health Economics Rattanavipapong, Waranya Worakijthamrongchai, Thanaboon Soboon, Budsadee Luankongsomchit, Vilawan Kongmuangpuk, Mananchaya Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee Teerawattananon, Yot Nilanont, Yongchai Economic evaluation of endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke in Thailand |
title | Economic evaluation of endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke in Thailand |
title_full | Economic evaluation of endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke in Thailand |
title_fullStr | Economic evaluation of endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke in Thailand |
title_full_unstemmed | Economic evaluation of endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke in Thailand |
title_short | Economic evaluation of endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke in Thailand |
title_sort | economic evaluation of endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke in thailand |
topic | Health Economics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9516067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36167373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064403 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rattanavipapongwaranya economicevaluationofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischaemicstrokeinthailand AT worakijthamrongchaithanaboon economicevaluationofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischaemicstrokeinthailand AT soboonbudsadee economicevaluationofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischaemicstrokeinthailand AT luankongsomchitvilawan economicevaluationofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischaemicstrokeinthailand AT kongmuangpukmananchaya economicevaluationofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischaemicstrokeinthailand AT isaranuwatchaiwanrudee economicevaluationofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischaemicstrokeinthailand AT teerawattananonyot economicevaluationofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischaemicstrokeinthailand AT nilanontyongchai economicevaluationofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischaemicstrokeinthailand |