Cargando…
Evaluation of the introduction of QOF quality improvement modules in English general practice: early findings from a rapid, qualitative exploration of implementation
BACKGROUND: A 2018 review of the English primary care pay-for-performance scheme, the Quality and Outcomes Framework, suggested that it should evolve to better support holistic, patient-centred care and leadership for quality improvement (QI). From 2019, as part of the vision of change, financially...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9516148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36162934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001960 |
_version_ | 1784798645938290688 |
---|---|
author | Bramwell, Donna Hotham, Sarah Peckham, Stephen Checkland, Kath Forbes, Lindsay J L |
author_facet | Bramwell, Donna Hotham, Sarah Peckham, Stephen Checkland, Kath Forbes, Lindsay J L |
author_sort | Bramwell, Donna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A 2018 review of the English primary care pay-for-performance scheme, the Quality and Outcomes Framework, suggested that it should evolve to better support holistic, patient-centred care and leadership for quality improvement (QI). From 2019, as part of the vision of change, financially incentivised QI cycles (initially in prescribing safety and end-of-life care), were introduced into the scheme. OBJECTIVES: To conduct a rapid evaluation of general practice staff attitudes, experiences and plans in relation to the implementation of the first two QI modules. This study was commissioned by NHS England and will inform development of the QI programme. METHODS: Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with 25 practice managers from a range of practices across England. Interviews were audio recorded with consent and transcribed verbatim. Anonymised data were reflexively thematically analysed using the framework method of analysis to identify common themes across the interviews. RESULTS: Participants reported broadly favourable views of incentivised QI, suggesting the prescribing safety module was easier to implement than the end-of-life module. Additional staff time needed and challenges of reviewing activities with other practices were reported as concerns. Some highlighted that local flexibility and influence on subject matter may improve the effectiveness of QI. Several questioned the choices of topic, recognising greater need and potential for improving quality of care in other clinical areas. CONCLUSION: Practices supported the idea of financial incentivisation of QI, however, it will be important to ensure that focus on QI cycles in specific clinical areas does not have unintended effects. A key issue will be keeping up momentum with the introduction of new modules each year which are time consuming to carry out for time poor General Practitioners (GPs)/practices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9516148 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95161482022-09-29 Evaluation of the introduction of QOF quality improvement modules in English general practice: early findings from a rapid, qualitative exploration of implementation Bramwell, Donna Hotham, Sarah Peckham, Stephen Checkland, Kath Forbes, Lindsay J L BMJ Open Qual Original Research BACKGROUND: A 2018 review of the English primary care pay-for-performance scheme, the Quality and Outcomes Framework, suggested that it should evolve to better support holistic, patient-centred care and leadership for quality improvement (QI). From 2019, as part of the vision of change, financially incentivised QI cycles (initially in prescribing safety and end-of-life care), were introduced into the scheme. OBJECTIVES: To conduct a rapid evaluation of general practice staff attitudes, experiences and plans in relation to the implementation of the first two QI modules. This study was commissioned by NHS England and will inform development of the QI programme. METHODS: Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with 25 practice managers from a range of practices across England. Interviews were audio recorded with consent and transcribed verbatim. Anonymised data were reflexively thematically analysed using the framework method of analysis to identify common themes across the interviews. RESULTS: Participants reported broadly favourable views of incentivised QI, suggesting the prescribing safety module was easier to implement than the end-of-life module. Additional staff time needed and challenges of reviewing activities with other practices were reported as concerns. Some highlighted that local flexibility and influence on subject matter may improve the effectiveness of QI. Several questioned the choices of topic, recognising greater need and potential for improving quality of care in other clinical areas. CONCLUSION: Practices supported the idea of financial incentivisation of QI, however, it will be important to ensure that focus on QI cycles in specific clinical areas does not have unintended effects. A key issue will be keeping up momentum with the introduction of new modules each year which are time consuming to carry out for time poor General Practitioners (GPs)/practices. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9516148/ /pubmed/36162934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001960 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Bramwell, Donna Hotham, Sarah Peckham, Stephen Checkland, Kath Forbes, Lindsay J L Evaluation of the introduction of QOF quality improvement modules in English general practice: early findings from a rapid, qualitative exploration of implementation |
title | Evaluation of the introduction of QOF quality improvement modules in English general practice: early findings from a rapid, qualitative exploration of implementation |
title_full | Evaluation of the introduction of QOF quality improvement modules in English general practice: early findings from a rapid, qualitative exploration of implementation |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the introduction of QOF quality improvement modules in English general practice: early findings from a rapid, qualitative exploration of implementation |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the introduction of QOF quality improvement modules in English general practice: early findings from a rapid, qualitative exploration of implementation |
title_short | Evaluation of the introduction of QOF quality improvement modules in English general practice: early findings from a rapid, qualitative exploration of implementation |
title_sort | evaluation of the introduction of qof quality improvement modules in english general practice: early findings from a rapid, qualitative exploration of implementation |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9516148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36162934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001960 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bramwelldonna evaluationoftheintroductionofqofqualityimprovementmodulesinenglishgeneralpracticeearlyfindingsfromarapidqualitativeexplorationofimplementation AT hothamsarah evaluationoftheintroductionofqofqualityimprovementmodulesinenglishgeneralpracticeearlyfindingsfromarapidqualitativeexplorationofimplementation AT peckhamstephen evaluationoftheintroductionofqofqualityimprovementmodulesinenglishgeneralpracticeearlyfindingsfromarapidqualitativeexplorationofimplementation AT checklandkath evaluationoftheintroductionofqofqualityimprovementmodulesinenglishgeneralpracticeearlyfindingsfromarapidqualitativeexplorationofimplementation AT forbeslindsayjl evaluationoftheintroductionofqofqualityimprovementmodulesinenglishgeneralpracticeearlyfindingsfromarapidqualitativeexplorationofimplementation |