Cargando…

Quality Output Checklist and Content Assessment (QuOCCA): a new tool for assessing research quality and reproducibility

Research must be well designed, properly conducted and clearly and transparently reported. Our independent medical research institute wanted a simple, generic tool to assess the quality of the research conducted by its researchers, with the goal of identifying areas that could be improved through ta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Héroux, Martin E, Butler, Annie A, Cashin, Aidan G, McCaughey, Euan J, Affleck, Andrew J, Green, Michael A, Cartwright, Andrew, Jones, Matthew, Kiely, Kim M, van Schooten, Kimberley S, Menant, Jasmine C, Wewege, Michael, Gandevia, Simon C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9516158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36167369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060976
_version_ 1784798648444387328
author Héroux, Martin E
Butler, Annie A
Cashin, Aidan G
McCaughey, Euan J
Affleck, Andrew J
Green, Michael A
Cartwright, Andrew
Jones, Matthew
Kiely, Kim M
van Schooten, Kimberley S
Menant, Jasmine C
Wewege, Michael
Gandevia, Simon C
author_facet Héroux, Martin E
Butler, Annie A
Cashin, Aidan G
McCaughey, Euan J
Affleck, Andrew J
Green, Michael A
Cartwright, Andrew
Jones, Matthew
Kiely, Kim M
van Schooten, Kimberley S
Menant, Jasmine C
Wewege, Michael
Gandevia, Simon C
author_sort Héroux, Martin E
collection PubMed
description Research must be well designed, properly conducted and clearly and transparently reported. Our independent medical research institute wanted a simple, generic tool to assess the quality of the research conducted by its researchers, with the goal of identifying areas that could be improved through targeted educational activities. Unfortunately, none was available, thus we devised our own. Here, we report development of the Quality Output Checklist and Content Assessment (QuOCCA), and its application to publications from our institute’s scientists. Following consensus meetings and external review by statistical and methodological experts, 11 items were selected for the final version of the QuOCCA: research transparency (items 1–3), research design and analysis (items 4–6) and research reporting practices (items 7–11). Five pairs of raters assessed all 231 articles published in 2017 and 221 in 2018 by researchers at our institute. Overall, the results were similar between years and revealed limited engagement with several recommended practices highlighted in the QuOCCA. These results will be useful to guide educational initiatives and their effectiveness. The QuOCCA is brief and focuses on broadly applicable and relevant concepts to open, high-quality, reproducible and well-reported science. Thus, the QuOCCA could be used by other biomedical institutions and individual researchers to evaluate research publications, assess changes in research practice over time and guide the discussion about high-quality, open science. Given its generic nature, the QuOCCA may also be useful in other research disciplines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9516158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95161582022-09-29 Quality Output Checklist and Content Assessment (QuOCCA): a new tool for assessing research quality and reproducibility Héroux, Martin E Butler, Annie A Cashin, Aidan G McCaughey, Euan J Affleck, Andrew J Green, Michael A Cartwright, Andrew Jones, Matthew Kiely, Kim M van Schooten, Kimberley S Menant, Jasmine C Wewege, Michael Gandevia, Simon C BMJ Open Communication Research must be well designed, properly conducted and clearly and transparently reported. Our independent medical research institute wanted a simple, generic tool to assess the quality of the research conducted by its researchers, with the goal of identifying areas that could be improved through targeted educational activities. Unfortunately, none was available, thus we devised our own. Here, we report development of the Quality Output Checklist and Content Assessment (QuOCCA), and its application to publications from our institute’s scientists. Following consensus meetings and external review by statistical and methodological experts, 11 items were selected for the final version of the QuOCCA: research transparency (items 1–3), research design and analysis (items 4–6) and research reporting practices (items 7–11). Five pairs of raters assessed all 231 articles published in 2017 and 221 in 2018 by researchers at our institute. Overall, the results were similar between years and revealed limited engagement with several recommended practices highlighted in the QuOCCA. These results will be useful to guide educational initiatives and their effectiveness. The QuOCCA is brief and focuses on broadly applicable and relevant concepts to open, high-quality, reproducible and well-reported science. Thus, the QuOCCA could be used by other biomedical institutions and individual researchers to evaluate research publications, assess changes in research practice over time and guide the discussion about high-quality, open science. Given its generic nature, the QuOCCA may also be useful in other research disciplines. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9516158/ /pubmed/36167369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060976 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Communication
Héroux, Martin E
Butler, Annie A
Cashin, Aidan G
McCaughey, Euan J
Affleck, Andrew J
Green, Michael A
Cartwright, Andrew
Jones, Matthew
Kiely, Kim M
van Schooten, Kimberley S
Menant, Jasmine C
Wewege, Michael
Gandevia, Simon C
Quality Output Checklist and Content Assessment (QuOCCA): a new tool for assessing research quality and reproducibility
title Quality Output Checklist and Content Assessment (QuOCCA): a new tool for assessing research quality and reproducibility
title_full Quality Output Checklist and Content Assessment (QuOCCA): a new tool for assessing research quality and reproducibility
title_fullStr Quality Output Checklist and Content Assessment (QuOCCA): a new tool for assessing research quality and reproducibility
title_full_unstemmed Quality Output Checklist and Content Assessment (QuOCCA): a new tool for assessing research quality and reproducibility
title_short Quality Output Checklist and Content Assessment (QuOCCA): a new tool for assessing research quality and reproducibility
title_sort quality output checklist and content assessment (quocca): a new tool for assessing research quality and reproducibility
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9516158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36167369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060976
work_keys_str_mv AT herouxmartine qualityoutputchecklistandcontentassessmentquoccaanewtoolforassessingresearchqualityandreproducibility
AT butleranniea qualityoutputchecklistandcontentassessmentquoccaanewtoolforassessingresearchqualityandreproducibility
AT cashinaidang qualityoutputchecklistandcontentassessmentquoccaanewtoolforassessingresearchqualityandreproducibility
AT mccaugheyeuanj qualityoutputchecklistandcontentassessmentquoccaanewtoolforassessingresearchqualityandreproducibility
AT affleckandrewj qualityoutputchecklistandcontentassessmentquoccaanewtoolforassessingresearchqualityandreproducibility
AT greenmichaela qualityoutputchecklistandcontentassessmentquoccaanewtoolforassessingresearchqualityandreproducibility
AT cartwrightandrew qualityoutputchecklistandcontentassessmentquoccaanewtoolforassessingresearchqualityandreproducibility
AT jonesmatthew qualityoutputchecklistandcontentassessmentquoccaanewtoolforassessingresearchqualityandreproducibility
AT kielykimm qualityoutputchecklistandcontentassessmentquoccaanewtoolforassessingresearchqualityandreproducibility
AT vanschootenkimberleys qualityoutputchecklistandcontentassessmentquoccaanewtoolforassessingresearchqualityandreproducibility
AT menantjasminec qualityoutputchecklistandcontentassessmentquoccaanewtoolforassessingresearchqualityandreproducibility
AT wewegemichael qualityoutputchecklistandcontentassessmentquoccaanewtoolforassessingresearchqualityandreproducibility
AT gandeviasimonc qualityoutputchecklistandcontentassessmentquoccaanewtoolforassessingresearchqualityandreproducibility