Cargando…
Pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus by models of care: a retrospective cohort study
OBJECTIVE: To compare birth outcomes of women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) with background obstetric population, stratified by models of care. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A tertiary referral centre in Sydney, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: All births 1 January 2018 to 30 Novem...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9516164/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36167384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065063 |
_version_ | 1784798650297221120 |
---|---|
author | Harrison, Jackson Melov, Sarah Kirby, Adrienne C Athayde, Neil Boghossian, Araz Cheung, Wah Inglis, Emma Maravar, Kavita Padmanabhan, Suja Luig, Melissa Hook, Monica Pasupathy, Dharmintra |
author_facet | Harrison, Jackson Melov, Sarah Kirby, Adrienne C Athayde, Neil Boghossian, Araz Cheung, Wah Inglis, Emma Maravar, Kavita Padmanabhan, Suja Luig, Melissa Hook, Monica Pasupathy, Dharmintra |
author_sort | Harrison, Jackson |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare birth outcomes of women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) with background obstetric population, stratified by models of care. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A tertiary referral centre in Sydney, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: All births 1 January 2018 to 30 November 2020. Births <24 weeks, multiple gestations and women with pre-existing diabetes were excluded. METHODS: Data were obtained from electronic medical records. Women were classified according to GDM status and last clinic attended prior to delivery. Model of care included attendance at dedicated GDM obstetric clinics, and routine antenatal care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), pre-term birth (PTB), induction of labour (IOL), operative delivery, small for gestational age (SGA), large for gestational age, postpartum haemorrhage, obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS), neonatal hypoglycaemia, neonatal hypothermia, neonatal respiratory distress, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. RESULTS: The GDM rate was 16.3%, with 34.0% of women managed in dedicated GDM clinics. Women with GDM had higher rates of several adverse outcomes. Only women with GDM attending non-dedicated clinics had increased odds of HDP (adjusted OR (adj OR) 1.6, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.0), PTB (adj OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.0), OASIS (adj OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0 to 2.0), similar odds of induction (adj OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.1) compared with non-GDM women. There were increased odds of NICU admission (adj OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.8) similar to women attending high-risk GDM clinics. CONCLUSIONS: Women with GDM receiving care in lower risk clinics had similar or higher rates of adverse outcomes. Pathways of care need to be similar in all women with GDM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9516164 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95161642022-09-29 Pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus by models of care: a retrospective cohort study Harrison, Jackson Melov, Sarah Kirby, Adrienne C Athayde, Neil Boghossian, Araz Cheung, Wah Inglis, Emma Maravar, Kavita Padmanabhan, Suja Luig, Melissa Hook, Monica Pasupathy, Dharmintra BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVE: To compare birth outcomes of women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) with background obstetric population, stratified by models of care. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A tertiary referral centre in Sydney, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: All births 1 January 2018 to 30 November 2020. Births <24 weeks, multiple gestations and women with pre-existing diabetes were excluded. METHODS: Data were obtained from electronic medical records. Women were classified according to GDM status and last clinic attended prior to delivery. Model of care included attendance at dedicated GDM obstetric clinics, and routine antenatal care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), pre-term birth (PTB), induction of labour (IOL), operative delivery, small for gestational age (SGA), large for gestational age, postpartum haemorrhage, obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS), neonatal hypoglycaemia, neonatal hypothermia, neonatal respiratory distress, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. RESULTS: The GDM rate was 16.3%, with 34.0% of women managed in dedicated GDM clinics. Women with GDM had higher rates of several adverse outcomes. Only women with GDM attending non-dedicated clinics had increased odds of HDP (adjusted OR (adj OR) 1.6, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.0), PTB (adj OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.0), OASIS (adj OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0 to 2.0), similar odds of induction (adj OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.1) compared with non-GDM women. There were increased odds of NICU admission (adj OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.8) similar to women attending high-risk GDM clinics. CONCLUSIONS: Women with GDM receiving care in lower risk clinics had similar or higher rates of adverse outcomes. Pathways of care need to be similar in all women with GDM. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9516164/ /pubmed/36167384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065063 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Obstetrics and Gynaecology Harrison, Jackson Melov, Sarah Kirby, Adrienne C Athayde, Neil Boghossian, Araz Cheung, Wah Inglis, Emma Maravar, Kavita Padmanabhan, Suja Luig, Melissa Hook, Monica Pasupathy, Dharmintra Pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus by models of care: a retrospective cohort study |
title | Pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus by models of care: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full | Pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus by models of care: a retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus by models of care: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus by models of care: a retrospective cohort study |
title_short | Pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus by models of care: a retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus by models of care: a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Obstetrics and Gynaecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9516164/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36167384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065063 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harrisonjackson pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusbymodelsofcarearetrospectivecohortstudy AT melovsarah pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusbymodelsofcarearetrospectivecohortstudy AT kirbyadriennec pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusbymodelsofcarearetrospectivecohortstudy AT athaydeneil pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusbymodelsofcarearetrospectivecohortstudy AT boghossianaraz pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusbymodelsofcarearetrospectivecohortstudy AT cheungwah pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusbymodelsofcarearetrospectivecohortstudy AT inglisemma pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusbymodelsofcarearetrospectivecohortstudy AT maravarkavita pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusbymodelsofcarearetrospectivecohortstudy AT padmanabhansuja pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusbymodelsofcarearetrospectivecohortstudy AT luigmelissa pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusbymodelsofcarearetrospectivecohortstudy AT hookmonica pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusbymodelsofcarearetrospectivecohortstudy AT pasupathydharmintra pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusbymodelsofcarearetrospectivecohortstudy |