Cargando…

Pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus by models of care: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE: To compare birth outcomes of women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) with background obstetric population, stratified by models of care. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A tertiary referral centre in Sydney, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: All births 1 January 2018 to 30 Novem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harrison, Jackson, Melov, Sarah, Kirby, Adrienne C, Athayde, Neil, Boghossian, Araz, Cheung, Wah, Inglis, Emma, Maravar, Kavita, Padmanabhan, Suja, Luig, Melissa, Hook, Monica, Pasupathy, Dharmintra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9516164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36167384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065063
_version_ 1784798650297221120
author Harrison, Jackson
Melov, Sarah
Kirby, Adrienne C
Athayde, Neil
Boghossian, Araz
Cheung, Wah
Inglis, Emma
Maravar, Kavita
Padmanabhan, Suja
Luig, Melissa
Hook, Monica
Pasupathy, Dharmintra
author_facet Harrison, Jackson
Melov, Sarah
Kirby, Adrienne C
Athayde, Neil
Boghossian, Araz
Cheung, Wah
Inglis, Emma
Maravar, Kavita
Padmanabhan, Suja
Luig, Melissa
Hook, Monica
Pasupathy, Dharmintra
author_sort Harrison, Jackson
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare birth outcomes of women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) with background obstetric population, stratified by models of care. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A tertiary referral centre in Sydney, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: All births 1 January 2018 to 30 November 2020. Births <24 weeks, multiple gestations and women with pre-existing diabetes were excluded. METHODS: Data were obtained from electronic medical records. Women were classified according to GDM status and last clinic attended prior to delivery. Model of care included attendance at dedicated GDM obstetric clinics, and routine antenatal care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), pre-term birth (PTB), induction of labour (IOL), operative delivery, small for gestational age (SGA), large for gestational age, postpartum haemorrhage, obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS), neonatal hypoglycaemia, neonatal hypothermia, neonatal respiratory distress, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. RESULTS: The GDM rate was 16.3%, with 34.0% of women managed in dedicated GDM clinics. Women with GDM had higher rates of several adverse outcomes. Only women with GDM attending non-dedicated clinics had increased odds of HDP (adjusted OR (adj OR) 1.6, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.0), PTB (adj OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.0), OASIS (adj OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0 to 2.0), similar odds of induction (adj OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.1) compared with non-GDM women. There were increased odds of NICU admission (adj OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.8) similar to women attending high-risk GDM clinics. CONCLUSIONS: Women with GDM receiving care in lower risk clinics had similar or higher rates of adverse outcomes. Pathways of care need to be similar in all women with GDM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9516164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95161642022-09-29 Pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus by models of care: a retrospective cohort study Harrison, Jackson Melov, Sarah Kirby, Adrienne C Athayde, Neil Boghossian, Araz Cheung, Wah Inglis, Emma Maravar, Kavita Padmanabhan, Suja Luig, Melissa Hook, Monica Pasupathy, Dharmintra BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVE: To compare birth outcomes of women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) with background obstetric population, stratified by models of care. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A tertiary referral centre in Sydney, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: All births 1 January 2018 to 30 November 2020. Births <24 weeks, multiple gestations and women with pre-existing diabetes were excluded. METHODS: Data were obtained from electronic medical records. Women were classified according to GDM status and last clinic attended prior to delivery. Model of care included attendance at dedicated GDM obstetric clinics, and routine antenatal care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), pre-term birth (PTB), induction of labour (IOL), operative delivery, small for gestational age (SGA), large for gestational age, postpartum haemorrhage, obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS), neonatal hypoglycaemia, neonatal hypothermia, neonatal respiratory distress, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. RESULTS: The GDM rate was 16.3%, with 34.0% of women managed in dedicated GDM clinics. Women with GDM had higher rates of several adverse outcomes. Only women with GDM attending non-dedicated clinics had increased odds of HDP (adjusted OR (adj OR) 1.6, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.0), PTB (adj OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.0), OASIS (adj OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0 to 2.0), similar odds of induction (adj OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.1) compared with non-GDM women. There were increased odds of NICU admission (adj OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.8) similar to women attending high-risk GDM clinics. CONCLUSIONS: Women with GDM receiving care in lower risk clinics had similar or higher rates of adverse outcomes. Pathways of care need to be similar in all women with GDM. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9516164/ /pubmed/36167384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065063 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Harrison, Jackson
Melov, Sarah
Kirby, Adrienne C
Athayde, Neil
Boghossian, Araz
Cheung, Wah
Inglis, Emma
Maravar, Kavita
Padmanabhan, Suja
Luig, Melissa
Hook, Monica
Pasupathy, Dharmintra
Pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus by models of care: a retrospective cohort study
title Pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus by models of care: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus by models of care: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus by models of care: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus by models of care: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus by models of care: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus by models of care: a retrospective cohort study
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9516164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36167384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065063
work_keys_str_mv AT harrisonjackson pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusbymodelsofcarearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT melovsarah pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusbymodelsofcarearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT kirbyadriennec pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusbymodelsofcarearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT athaydeneil pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusbymodelsofcarearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT boghossianaraz pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusbymodelsofcarearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT cheungwah pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusbymodelsofcarearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT inglisemma pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusbymodelsofcarearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT maravarkavita pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusbymodelsofcarearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT padmanabhansuja pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusbymodelsofcarearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT luigmelissa pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusbymodelsofcarearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT hookmonica pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusbymodelsofcarearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT pasupathydharmintra pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusbymodelsofcarearetrospectivecohortstudy