Cargando…

Effectiveness of interventions to improve health behaviours of health professionals: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions designed to improve the health behaviours of health professionals. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Database searches: Medline, Cochrane library, Embase and CINAHL. REVIEW METHODS: This systematic review used Preferred Reporting Items...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hobby, Julie, Crowley, Jennifer, Barnes, Katelyn, Mitchell, Lana, Parkinson, Joy, Ball, Lauren
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9516219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36167392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058955
_version_ 1784798660789272576
author Hobby, Julie
Crowley, Jennifer
Barnes, Katelyn
Mitchell, Lana
Parkinson, Joy
Ball, Lauren
author_facet Hobby, Julie
Crowley, Jennifer
Barnes, Katelyn
Mitchell, Lana
Parkinson, Joy
Ball, Lauren
author_sort Hobby, Julie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions designed to improve the health behaviours of health professionals. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Database searches: Medline, Cochrane library, Embase and CINAHL. REVIEW METHODS: This systematic review used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to compare randomised controlled trials of health professionals, published between 2010 and 2021, which aimed to improve at least one health behaviour such as physical activity, diet, smoking status, mental health and stress. Two independent reviewers screened articles, extracted data and assessed quality of studies and reporting. The quality of articles was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project quality assessment tool and the completeness of intervention reporting was assessed. OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome assessed was change in behaviour between intervention and control groups from baseline to follow-up. RESULTS: Nine studies met the eligibility criteria, totalling 1107 participants. Health behaviours targeted were mental health and stress, physical activity, and smoking cessation, physical activity and nutrition. Six interventions observed significant improvements in the health behaviour in the intervention compared with control groups. Seven of the studies selected in person workshops as the mode of intervention delivery. The quality of the included studies was high with 80% (7/9) graded as moderate or strong. CONCLUSIONS: Although high heterogeneity was found between interventions and outcomes, promising progress has occurred across a variety of health behaviours. Improving reporting and use of theories and models may improve effectiveness and evaluation of interventions. Further investigation is needed to recommend effective strategies. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021238684.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9516219
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95162192022-09-29 Effectiveness of interventions to improve health behaviours of health professionals: a systematic review Hobby, Julie Crowley, Jennifer Barnes, Katelyn Mitchell, Lana Parkinson, Joy Ball, Lauren BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions designed to improve the health behaviours of health professionals. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Database searches: Medline, Cochrane library, Embase and CINAHL. REVIEW METHODS: This systematic review used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to compare randomised controlled trials of health professionals, published between 2010 and 2021, which aimed to improve at least one health behaviour such as physical activity, diet, smoking status, mental health and stress. Two independent reviewers screened articles, extracted data and assessed quality of studies and reporting. The quality of articles was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project quality assessment tool and the completeness of intervention reporting was assessed. OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome assessed was change in behaviour between intervention and control groups from baseline to follow-up. RESULTS: Nine studies met the eligibility criteria, totalling 1107 participants. Health behaviours targeted were mental health and stress, physical activity, and smoking cessation, physical activity and nutrition. Six interventions observed significant improvements in the health behaviour in the intervention compared with control groups. Seven of the studies selected in person workshops as the mode of intervention delivery. The quality of the included studies was high with 80% (7/9) graded as moderate or strong. CONCLUSIONS: Although high heterogeneity was found between interventions and outcomes, promising progress has occurred across a variety of health behaviours. Improving reporting and use of theories and models may improve effectiveness and evaluation of interventions. Further investigation is needed to recommend effective strategies. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021238684. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9516219/ /pubmed/36167392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058955 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Public Health
Hobby, Julie
Crowley, Jennifer
Barnes, Katelyn
Mitchell, Lana
Parkinson, Joy
Ball, Lauren
Effectiveness of interventions to improve health behaviours of health professionals: a systematic review
title Effectiveness of interventions to improve health behaviours of health professionals: a systematic review
title_full Effectiveness of interventions to improve health behaviours of health professionals: a systematic review
title_fullStr Effectiveness of interventions to improve health behaviours of health professionals: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of interventions to improve health behaviours of health professionals: a systematic review
title_short Effectiveness of interventions to improve health behaviours of health professionals: a systematic review
title_sort effectiveness of interventions to improve health behaviours of health professionals: a systematic review
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9516219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36167392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058955
work_keys_str_mv AT hobbyjulie effectivenessofinterventionstoimprovehealthbehavioursofhealthprofessionalsasystematicreview
AT crowleyjennifer effectivenessofinterventionstoimprovehealthbehavioursofhealthprofessionalsasystematicreview
AT barneskatelyn effectivenessofinterventionstoimprovehealthbehavioursofhealthprofessionalsasystematicreview
AT mitchelllana effectivenessofinterventionstoimprovehealthbehavioursofhealthprofessionalsasystematicreview
AT parkinsonjoy effectivenessofinterventionstoimprovehealthbehavioursofhealthprofessionalsasystematicreview
AT balllauren effectivenessofinterventionstoimprovehealthbehavioursofhealthprofessionalsasystematicreview