Cargando…

Edible Insect Consumption for Human and Planetary Health: A Systematic Review

This systematic review aimed to examine the health outcomes and environmental impact of edible insect consumption. Following PRISMA-P guidelines, PubMed, Medline ProQuest, and Cochrane Library databases were searched until February 2021. Twenty-five articles met inclusion criteria: twelve animal and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ros-Baró, Marta, Casas-Agustench, Patricia, Díaz-Rizzolo, Diana Alícia, Batlle-Bayer, Laura, Adrià-Acosta, Ferran, Aguilar-Martínez, Alícia, Medina, Francesc-Xavier, Pujolà, Montserrat, Bach-Faig, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9517137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36141915
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811653
_version_ 1784798864940728320
author Ros-Baró, Marta
Casas-Agustench, Patricia
Díaz-Rizzolo, Diana Alícia
Batlle-Bayer, Laura
Adrià-Acosta, Ferran
Aguilar-Martínez, Alícia
Medina, Francesc-Xavier
Pujolà, Montserrat
Bach-Faig, Anna
author_facet Ros-Baró, Marta
Casas-Agustench, Patricia
Díaz-Rizzolo, Diana Alícia
Batlle-Bayer, Laura
Adrià-Acosta, Ferran
Aguilar-Martínez, Alícia
Medina, Francesc-Xavier
Pujolà, Montserrat
Bach-Faig, Anna
author_sort Ros-Baró, Marta
collection PubMed
description This systematic review aimed to examine the health outcomes and environmental impact of edible insect consumption. Following PRISMA-P guidelines, PubMed, Medline ProQuest, and Cochrane Library databases were searched until February 2021. Twenty-five articles met inclusion criteria: twelve animal and six human studies (randomized, non-randomized, and crossover control trials), and seven studies on sustainability outcomes. In animal studies, a supplement (in powdered form) of 0.5 g/kg of glycosaminoglycans significantly reduced abdominal and epididymal fat weight (5–40% and 5–24%, respectively), blood glucose (10–22%), and total cholesterol levels (9–10%), and a supplement of 5 mg/kg chitin/chitosan reduced body weight (1–4%) and abdominal fat accumulation (4%) versus control diets. In other animal studies, doses up to 7–15% of edible insect inclusion level significantly improved the live weight (9–33%), reduced levels of triglycerides (44%), cholesterol (14%), and blood glucose (8%), and increased microbiota diversity (2%) versus control diet. In human studies, doses up to 7% of edible insect inclusion level produced a significant improvement in gut health (6%) and reduction in systemic inflammation (2%) versus control diets and a significant increase in blood concentrations of essential and branched-chain amino acids and slowing of digestion (40%) versus whey treatment. Environmental indicators (land use, water footprint, and greenhouse gas emissions) were 40–60% lower for the feed and food of edible insects than for traditional animal livestock. More research is warranted on the edible insect dose responsible for health effects and on environmental indicators of edible insects for human nutrition. This research demonstrates how edible insects can be an alternative protein source not only to improve human and animal nutrition but also to exert positive effects on planetary health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9517137
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95171372022-09-29 Edible Insect Consumption for Human and Planetary Health: A Systematic Review Ros-Baró, Marta Casas-Agustench, Patricia Díaz-Rizzolo, Diana Alícia Batlle-Bayer, Laura Adrià-Acosta, Ferran Aguilar-Martínez, Alícia Medina, Francesc-Xavier Pujolà, Montserrat Bach-Faig, Anna Int J Environ Res Public Health Systematic Review This systematic review aimed to examine the health outcomes and environmental impact of edible insect consumption. Following PRISMA-P guidelines, PubMed, Medline ProQuest, and Cochrane Library databases were searched until February 2021. Twenty-five articles met inclusion criteria: twelve animal and six human studies (randomized, non-randomized, and crossover control trials), and seven studies on sustainability outcomes. In animal studies, a supplement (in powdered form) of 0.5 g/kg of glycosaminoglycans significantly reduced abdominal and epididymal fat weight (5–40% and 5–24%, respectively), blood glucose (10–22%), and total cholesterol levels (9–10%), and a supplement of 5 mg/kg chitin/chitosan reduced body weight (1–4%) and abdominal fat accumulation (4%) versus control diets. In other animal studies, doses up to 7–15% of edible insect inclusion level significantly improved the live weight (9–33%), reduced levels of triglycerides (44%), cholesterol (14%), and blood glucose (8%), and increased microbiota diversity (2%) versus control diet. In human studies, doses up to 7% of edible insect inclusion level produced a significant improvement in gut health (6%) and reduction in systemic inflammation (2%) versus control diets and a significant increase in blood concentrations of essential and branched-chain amino acids and slowing of digestion (40%) versus whey treatment. Environmental indicators (land use, water footprint, and greenhouse gas emissions) were 40–60% lower for the feed and food of edible insects than for traditional animal livestock. More research is warranted on the edible insect dose responsible for health effects and on environmental indicators of edible insects for human nutrition. This research demonstrates how edible insects can be an alternative protein source not only to improve human and animal nutrition but also to exert positive effects on planetary health. MDPI 2022-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9517137/ /pubmed/36141915 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811653 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Ros-Baró, Marta
Casas-Agustench, Patricia
Díaz-Rizzolo, Diana Alícia
Batlle-Bayer, Laura
Adrià-Acosta, Ferran
Aguilar-Martínez, Alícia
Medina, Francesc-Xavier
Pujolà, Montserrat
Bach-Faig, Anna
Edible Insect Consumption for Human and Planetary Health: A Systematic Review
title Edible Insect Consumption for Human and Planetary Health: A Systematic Review
title_full Edible Insect Consumption for Human and Planetary Health: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Edible Insect Consumption for Human and Planetary Health: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Edible Insect Consumption for Human and Planetary Health: A Systematic Review
title_short Edible Insect Consumption for Human and Planetary Health: A Systematic Review
title_sort edible insect consumption for human and planetary health: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9517137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36141915
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811653
work_keys_str_mv AT rosbaromarta edibleinsectconsumptionforhumanandplanetaryhealthasystematicreview
AT casasagustenchpatricia edibleinsectconsumptionforhumanandplanetaryhealthasystematicreview
AT diazrizzolodianaalicia edibleinsectconsumptionforhumanandplanetaryhealthasystematicreview
AT batllebayerlaura edibleinsectconsumptionforhumanandplanetaryhealthasystematicreview
AT adriaacostaferran edibleinsectconsumptionforhumanandplanetaryhealthasystematicreview
AT aguilarmartinezalicia edibleinsectconsumptionforhumanandplanetaryhealthasystematicreview
AT medinafrancescxavier edibleinsectconsumptionforhumanandplanetaryhealthasystematicreview
AT pujolamontserrat edibleinsectconsumptionforhumanandplanetaryhealthasystematicreview
AT bachfaiganna edibleinsectconsumptionforhumanandplanetaryhealthasystematicreview