Cargando…

Influence of One Hour versus Two Hours of Daily Static Stretching for Six Weeks Using a Calf-Muscle-Stretching Orthosis on Maximal Strength

Rebuilding strength capacity is of crucial importance in rehabilitation since significant atrophy due to immobilization after injury and/or surgery can be assumed. To increase maximal strength (MSt), strength training is commonly used. The literature regarding animal studies show that long-lasting s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Warneke, Konstantin, Keiner, Michael, Hillebrecht, Martin, Schiemann, Stephan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9517223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36141890
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811621
_version_ 1784798885978308608
author Warneke, Konstantin
Keiner, Michael
Hillebrecht, Martin
Schiemann, Stephan
author_facet Warneke, Konstantin
Keiner, Michael
Hillebrecht, Martin
Schiemann, Stephan
author_sort Warneke, Konstantin
collection PubMed
description Rebuilding strength capacity is of crucial importance in rehabilitation since significant atrophy due to immobilization after injury and/or surgery can be assumed. To increase maximal strength (MSt), strength training is commonly used. The literature regarding animal studies show that long-lasting static stretching (LStr) interventions can also produce significant improvements in MSt with a dose–response relationship, with stretching times ranging from 30 min to 24 h per day; however, there is limited evidence in human studies. Consequently, the aim of this study is to investigate the dose–response relationship of long-lasting static stretching on MSt. A total of 70 active participants (f = 30, m = 39; age: 27.4 ± 4.4 years; height: 175.8 ± 2.1 cm; and weight: 79.5 ± 5.9 kg) were divided into three groups: IG1 and IG2 both performed unilateral stretching continuously for one (IG1) or two hours (IG2), respectively, per day for six weeks, while the CG served as the non-intervened control. MSt was determined in the plantar flexors in the intervened as well as in the non-intervened control leg to investigate the contralateral force transfer. Two-way ANOVA showed significant interaction effects for MSt in the intervened leg (ƞ(2) = 0.325, p < 0.001) and in the contralateral control leg (ƞ(2) = 0.123, p = 0.009), dependent upon stretching time. From this, it can be hypothesized that stretching duration had an influence on MSt increases, but both durations were sufficient to induce significant enhancements in MSt. Thus, possible applications in rehabilitation can be assumed, e.g., if no strength training can be performed, atrophy could instead be reduced by performing long-lasting static stretch training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9517223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95172232022-09-29 Influence of One Hour versus Two Hours of Daily Static Stretching for Six Weeks Using a Calf-Muscle-Stretching Orthosis on Maximal Strength Warneke, Konstantin Keiner, Michael Hillebrecht, Martin Schiemann, Stephan Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Rebuilding strength capacity is of crucial importance in rehabilitation since significant atrophy due to immobilization after injury and/or surgery can be assumed. To increase maximal strength (MSt), strength training is commonly used. The literature regarding animal studies show that long-lasting static stretching (LStr) interventions can also produce significant improvements in MSt with a dose–response relationship, with stretching times ranging from 30 min to 24 h per day; however, there is limited evidence in human studies. Consequently, the aim of this study is to investigate the dose–response relationship of long-lasting static stretching on MSt. A total of 70 active participants (f = 30, m = 39; age: 27.4 ± 4.4 years; height: 175.8 ± 2.1 cm; and weight: 79.5 ± 5.9 kg) were divided into three groups: IG1 and IG2 both performed unilateral stretching continuously for one (IG1) or two hours (IG2), respectively, per day for six weeks, while the CG served as the non-intervened control. MSt was determined in the plantar flexors in the intervened as well as in the non-intervened control leg to investigate the contralateral force transfer. Two-way ANOVA showed significant interaction effects for MSt in the intervened leg (ƞ(2) = 0.325, p < 0.001) and in the contralateral control leg (ƞ(2) = 0.123, p = 0.009), dependent upon stretching time. From this, it can be hypothesized that stretching duration had an influence on MSt increases, but both durations were sufficient to induce significant enhancements in MSt. Thus, possible applications in rehabilitation can be assumed, e.g., if no strength training can be performed, atrophy could instead be reduced by performing long-lasting static stretch training. MDPI 2022-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9517223/ /pubmed/36141890 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811621 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Warneke, Konstantin
Keiner, Michael
Hillebrecht, Martin
Schiemann, Stephan
Influence of One Hour versus Two Hours of Daily Static Stretching for Six Weeks Using a Calf-Muscle-Stretching Orthosis on Maximal Strength
title Influence of One Hour versus Two Hours of Daily Static Stretching for Six Weeks Using a Calf-Muscle-Stretching Orthosis on Maximal Strength
title_full Influence of One Hour versus Two Hours of Daily Static Stretching for Six Weeks Using a Calf-Muscle-Stretching Orthosis on Maximal Strength
title_fullStr Influence of One Hour versus Two Hours of Daily Static Stretching for Six Weeks Using a Calf-Muscle-Stretching Orthosis on Maximal Strength
title_full_unstemmed Influence of One Hour versus Two Hours of Daily Static Stretching for Six Weeks Using a Calf-Muscle-Stretching Orthosis on Maximal Strength
title_short Influence of One Hour versus Two Hours of Daily Static Stretching for Six Weeks Using a Calf-Muscle-Stretching Orthosis on Maximal Strength
title_sort influence of one hour versus two hours of daily static stretching for six weeks using a calf-muscle-stretching orthosis on maximal strength
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9517223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36141890
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811621
work_keys_str_mv AT warnekekonstantin influenceofonehourversustwohoursofdailystaticstretchingforsixweeksusingacalfmusclestretchingorthosisonmaximalstrength
AT keinermichael influenceofonehourversustwohoursofdailystaticstretchingforsixweeksusingacalfmusclestretchingorthosisonmaximalstrength
AT hillebrechtmartin influenceofonehourversustwohoursofdailystaticstretchingforsixweeksusingacalfmusclestretchingorthosisonmaximalstrength
AT schiemannstephan influenceofonehourversustwohoursofdailystaticstretchingforsixweeksusingacalfmusclestretchingorthosisonmaximalstrength