Cargando…

Profiling Analysis of Filter Feeder Polypedilum (Chironomidae) Gut Contents Using eDNA Metabarcoding Following Contrasting Habitat Types—Weir and Stream

We analyzed the dietary composition of Polypedilum larvae among two contrasting habitats (river and weir). Our approach was (i) to apply eDNA-based sampling to reveal the gut content of the chironomid larvae, (ii) the diversity of gut contents in the two aquatic habitats, and (iii) assessment of hab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rangaswamy, Boobal, Ji, Chang Woo, Kim, Won-Seok, Park, Jae-Won, Kim, Yong Jun, Kwak, Ihn-Sil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9517803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36078662
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710945
_version_ 1784799027228835840
author Rangaswamy, Boobal
Ji, Chang Woo
Kim, Won-Seok
Park, Jae-Won
Kim, Yong Jun
Kwak, Ihn-Sil
author_facet Rangaswamy, Boobal
Ji, Chang Woo
Kim, Won-Seok
Park, Jae-Won
Kim, Yong Jun
Kwak, Ihn-Sil
author_sort Rangaswamy, Boobal
collection PubMed
description We analyzed the dietary composition of Polypedilum larvae among two contrasting habitats (river and weir). Our approach was (i) to apply eDNA-based sampling to reveal the gut content of the chironomid larvae, (ii) the diversity of gut contents in the two aquatic habitats, and (iii) assessment of habitat sediment condition with the food sources in the gut. The most abundant food was Chlorophyta in the gut of the river (20%) and weir (39%) chironomids. The average ratio of fungi, protozoa, and zooplankton in river chironomids gut was 5.9%, 7.2%, and 3.8%, while it was found decreased to 1.2%, 2.5%, and 0.1% in weir chironomids. Aerobic fungi in river midge guts were 3.6% and 10.34% in SC and IS, while they were in the range of 0.34–2.58% in weir midges. The hierarchical clustering analysis showed a relationship of environmental factors with food contents. Abiotic factors (e.g., pH) in the river and weir habitats correlated the clustered pattern with phytoplankton and minor groups of fungi. This study could help understand the food source diversity in the chironomid and habitat environmental conditions by using eDNA metabarcoding as an effective tool to determine dietary composition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9517803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95178032022-09-29 Profiling Analysis of Filter Feeder Polypedilum (Chironomidae) Gut Contents Using eDNA Metabarcoding Following Contrasting Habitat Types—Weir and Stream Rangaswamy, Boobal Ji, Chang Woo Kim, Won-Seok Park, Jae-Won Kim, Yong Jun Kwak, Ihn-Sil Int J Environ Res Public Health Article We analyzed the dietary composition of Polypedilum larvae among two contrasting habitats (river and weir). Our approach was (i) to apply eDNA-based sampling to reveal the gut content of the chironomid larvae, (ii) the diversity of gut contents in the two aquatic habitats, and (iii) assessment of habitat sediment condition with the food sources in the gut. The most abundant food was Chlorophyta in the gut of the river (20%) and weir (39%) chironomids. The average ratio of fungi, protozoa, and zooplankton in river chironomids gut was 5.9%, 7.2%, and 3.8%, while it was found decreased to 1.2%, 2.5%, and 0.1% in weir chironomids. Aerobic fungi in river midge guts were 3.6% and 10.34% in SC and IS, while they were in the range of 0.34–2.58% in weir midges. The hierarchical clustering analysis showed a relationship of environmental factors with food contents. Abiotic factors (e.g., pH) in the river and weir habitats correlated the clustered pattern with phytoplankton and minor groups of fungi. This study could help understand the food source diversity in the chironomid and habitat environmental conditions by using eDNA metabarcoding as an effective tool to determine dietary composition. MDPI 2022-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9517803/ /pubmed/36078662 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710945 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rangaswamy, Boobal
Ji, Chang Woo
Kim, Won-Seok
Park, Jae-Won
Kim, Yong Jun
Kwak, Ihn-Sil
Profiling Analysis of Filter Feeder Polypedilum (Chironomidae) Gut Contents Using eDNA Metabarcoding Following Contrasting Habitat Types—Weir and Stream
title Profiling Analysis of Filter Feeder Polypedilum (Chironomidae) Gut Contents Using eDNA Metabarcoding Following Contrasting Habitat Types—Weir and Stream
title_full Profiling Analysis of Filter Feeder Polypedilum (Chironomidae) Gut Contents Using eDNA Metabarcoding Following Contrasting Habitat Types—Weir and Stream
title_fullStr Profiling Analysis of Filter Feeder Polypedilum (Chironomidae) Gut Contents Using eDNA Metabarcoding Following Contrasting Habitat Types—Weir and Stream
title_full_unstemmed Profiling Analysis of Filter Feeder Polypedilum (Chironomidae) Gut Contents Using eDNA Metabarcoding Following Contrasting Habitat Types—Weir and Stream
title_short Profiling Analysis of Filter Feeder Polypedilum (Chironomidae) Gut Contents Using eDNA Metabarcoding Following Contrasting Habitat Types—Weir and Stream
title_sort profiling analysis of filter feeder polypedilum (chironomidae) gut contents using edna metabarcoding following contrasting habitat types—weir and stream
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9517803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36078662
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710945
work_keys_str_mv AT rangaswamyboobal profilinganalysisoffilterfeederpolypedilumchironomidaegutcontentsusingednametabarcodingfollowingcontrastinghabitattypesweirandstream
AT jichangwoo profilinganalysisoffilterfeederpolypedilumchironomidaegutcontentsusingednametabarcodingfollowingcontrastinghabitattypesweirandstream
AT kimwonseok profilinganalysisoffilterfeederpolypedilumchironomidaegutcontentsusingednametabarcodingfollowingcontrastinghabitattypesweirandstream
AT parkjaewon profilinganalysisoffilterfeederpolypedilumchironomidaegutcontentsusingednametabarcodingfollowingcontrastinghabitattypesweirandstream
AT kimyongjun profilinganalysisoffilterfeederpolypedilumchironomidaegutcontentsusingednametabarcodingfollowingcontrastinghabitattypesweirandstream
AT kwakihnsil profilinganalysisoffilterfeederpolypedilumchironomidaegutcontentsusingednametabarcodingfollowingcontrastinghabitattypesweirandstream