Cargando…
Current Treatment of Cleft Patients in Europe from a Provider Perspective: A Cross-Sectional Survey
The latest Eurocleft study reported several discrepancies in cleft care. Since then, no critical assessment has been performed. This study aimed to better understand the main strengths and inefficiencies of cleft care within Europe. The Google documents platform was used to create an online survey t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9518109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36078357 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710638 |
_version_ | 1784799103317704704 |
---|---|
author | Francisco, Inês Antonarakis, Gregory S. Caramelo, Francisco Paula, Anabela Baptista Marto, Carlos Miguel Carrilho, Eunice Fernandes, Maria Helena Vale, Francisco |
author_facet | Francisco, Inês Antonarakis, Gregory S. Caramelo, Francisco Paula, Anabela Baptista Marto, Carlos Miguel Carrilho, Eunice Fernandes, Maria Helena Vale, Francisco |
author_sort | Francisco, Inês |
collection | PubMed |
description | The latest Eurocleft study reported several discrepancies in cleft care. Since then, no critical assessment has been performed. This study aimed to better understand the main strengths and inefficiencies of cleft care within Europe. The Google documents platform was used to create an online survey to investigate several aspects, i.e., provider characteristics, patient profile, services offered, and treatment protocols and complications. Descriptive statistics were calculated. The association between categorical variables was performed using Fisher’s exact test. The significance level chosen was 0.05. A total of 69 individuals from 23 European countries completed the survey. Centralized care was the preferred system, and the majority of the countries have an association for cleft patients and professionals (53.6%). The largest percentage of patients was seen in the university hospital environment (Fisher’s exact test p < 0.001). The majority of responders (98.6%) reported that an orthodontist was involved in cleft treatment, and 56.5% of them spend 76–100% of their time treating these patients. Despite cleft care having been reconfigured in Europe, a better consensus among the various centers regarding provider characteristics, services offered, and treatment protocols is still required. There is a need for better coordination between clinicians and national/international regulatory bodies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9518109 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95181092022-09-29 Current Treatment of Cleft Patients in Europe from a Provider Perspective: A Cross-Sectional Survey Francisco, Inês Antonarakis, Gregory S. Caramelo, Francisco Paula, Anabela Baptista Marto, Carlos Miguel Carrilho, Eunice Fernandes, Maria Helena Vale, Francisco Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The latest Eurocleft study reported several discrepancies in cleft care. Since then, no critical assessment has been performed. This study aimed to better understand the main strengths and inefficiencies of cleft care within Europe. The Google documents platform was used to create an online survey to investigate several aspects, i.e., provider characteristics, patient profile, services offered, and treatment protocols and complications. Descriptive statistics were calculated. The association between categorical variables was performed using Fisher’s exact test. The significance level chosen was 0.05. A total of 69 individuals from 23 European countries completed the survey. Centralized care was the preferred system, and the majority of the countries have an association for cleft patients and professionals (53.6%). The largest percentage of patients was seen in the university hospital environment (Fisher’s exact test p < 0.001). The majority of responders (98.6%) reported that an orthodontist was involved in cleft treatment, and 56.5% of them spend 76–100% of their time treating these patients. Despite cleft care having been reconfigured in Europe, a better consensus among the various centers regarding provider characteristics, services offered, and treatment protocols is still required. There is a need for better coordination between clinicians and national/international regulatory bodies. MDPI 2022-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9518109/ /pubmed/36078357 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710638 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Francisco, Inês Antonarakis, Gregory S. Caramelo, Francisco Paula, Anabela Baptista Marto, Carlos Miguel Carrilho, Eunice Fernandes, Maria Helena Vale, Francisco Current Treatment of Cleft Patients in Europe from a Provider Perspective: A Cross-Sectional Survey |
title | Current Treatment of Cleft Patients in Europe from a Provider Perspective: A Cross-Sectional Survey |
title_full | Current Treatment of Cleft Patients in Europe from a Provider Perspective: A Cross-Sectional Survey |
title_fullStr | Current Treatment of Cleft Patients in Europe from a Provider Perspective: A Cross-Sectional Survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Current Treatment of Cleft Patients in Europe from a Provider Perspective: A Cross-Sectional Survey |
title_short | Current Treatment of Cleft Patients in Europe from a Provider Perspective: A Cross-Sectional Survey |
title_sort | current treatment of cleft patients in europe from a provider perspective: a cross-sectional survey |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9518109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36078357 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710638 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT franciscoines currenttreatmentofcleftpatientsineuropefromaproviderperspectiveacrosssectionalsurvey AT antonarakisgregorys currenttreatmentofcleftpatientsineuropefromaproviderperspectiveacrosssectionalsurvey AT caramelofrancisco currenttreatmentofcleftpatientsineuropefromaproviderperspectiveacrosssectionalsurvey AT paulaanabelabaptista currenttreatmentofcleftpatientsineuropefromaproviderperspectiveacrosssectionalsurvey AT martocarlosmiguel currenttreatmentofcleftpatientsineuropefromaproviderperspectiveacrosssectionalsurvey AT carrilhoeunice currenttreatmentofcleftpatientsineuropefromaproviderperspectiveacrosssectionalsurvey AT fernandesmariahelena currenttreatmentofcleftpatientsineuropefromaproviderperspectiveacrosssectionalsurvey AT valefrancisco currenttreatmentofcleftpatientsineuropefromaproviderperspectiveacrosssectionalsurvey |