Cargando…

Current Treatment of Cleft Patients in Europe from a Provider Perspective: A Cross-Sectional Survey

The latest Eurocleft study reported several discrepancies in cleft care. Since then, no critical assessment has been performed. This study aimed to better understand the main strengths and inefficiencies of cleft care within Europe. The Google documents platform was used to create an online survey t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Francisco, Inês, Antonarakis, Gregory S., Caramelo, Francisco, Paula, Anabela Baptista, Marto, Carlos Miguel, Carrilho, Eunice, Fernandes, Maria Helena, Vale, Francisco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9518109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36078357
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710638
_version_ 1784799103317704704
author Francisco, Inês
Antonarakis, Gregory S.
Caramelo, Francisco
Paula, Anabela Baptista
Marto, Carlos Miguel
Carrilho, Eunice
Fernandes, Maria Helena
Vale, Francisco
author_facet Francisco, Inês
Antonarakis, Gregory S.
Caramelo, Francisco
Paula, Anabela Baptista
Marto, Carlos Miguel
Carrilho, Eunice
Fernandes, Maria Helena
Vale, Francisco
author_sort Francisco, Inês
collection PubMed
description The latest Eurocleft study reported several discrepancies in cleft care. Since then, no critical assessment has been performed. This study aimed to better understand the main strengths and inefficiencies of cleft care within Europe. The Google documents platform was used to create an online survey to investigate several aspects, i.e., provider characteristics, patient profile, services offered, and treatment protocols and complications. Descriptive statistics were calculated. The association between categorical variables was performed using Fisher’s exact test. The significance level chosen was 0.05. A total of 69 individuals from 23 European countries completed the survey. Centralized care was the preferred system, and the majority of the countries have an association for cleft patients and professionals (53.6%). The largest percentage of patients was seen in the university hospital environment (Fisher’s exact test p < 0.001). The majority of responders (98.6%) reported that an orthodontist was involved in cleft treatment, and 56.5% of them spend 76–100% of their time treating these patients. Despite cleft care having been reconfigured in Europe, a better consensus among the various centers regarding provider characteristics, services offered, and treatment protocols is still required. There is a need for better coordination between clinicians and national/international regulatory bodies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9518109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95181092022-09-29 Current Treatment of Cleft Patients in Europe from a Provider Perspective: A Cross-Sectional Survey Francisco, Inês Antonarakis, Gregory S. Caramelo, Francisco Paula, Anabela Baptista Marto, Carlos Miguel Carrilho, Eunice Fernandes, Maria Helena Vale, Francisco Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The latest Eurocleft study reported several discrepancies in cleft care. Since then, no critical assessment has been performed. This study aimed to better understand the main strengths and inefficiencies of cleft care within Europe. The Google documents platform was used to create an online survey to investigate several aspects, i.e., provider characteristics, patient profile, services offered, and treatment protocols and complications. Descriptive statistics were calculated. The association between categorical variables was performed using Fisher’s exact test. The significance level chosen was 0.05. A total of 69 individuals from 23 European countries completed the survey. Centralized care was the preferred system, and the majority of the countries have an association for cleft patients and professionals (53.6%). The largest percentage of patients was seen in the university hospital environment (Fisher’s exact test p < 0.001). The majority of responders (98.6%) reported that an orthodontist was involved in cleft treatment, and 56.5% of them spend 76–100% of their time treating these patients. Despite cleft care having been reconfigured in Europe, a better consensus among the various centers regarding provider characteristics, services offered, and treatment protocols is still required. There is a need for better coordination between clinicians and national/international regulatory bodies. MDPI 2022-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9518109/ /pubmed/36078357 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710638 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Francisco, Inês
Antonarakis, Gregory S.
Caramelo, Francisco
Paula, Anabela Baptista
Marto, Carlos Miguel
Carrilho, Eunice
Fernandes, Maria Helena
Vale, Francisco
Current Treatment of Cleft Patients in Europe from a Provider Perspective: A Cross-Sectional Survey
title Current Treatment of Cleft Patients in Europe from a Provider Perspective: A Cross-Sectional Survey
title_full Current Treatment of Cleft Patients in Europe from a Provider Perspective: A Cross-Sectional Survey
title_fullStr Current Treatment of Cleft Patients in Europe from a Provider Perspective: A Cross-Sectional Survey
title_full_unstemmed Current Treatment of Cleft Patients in Europe from a Provider Perspective: A Cross-Sectional Survey
title_short Current Treatment of Cleft Patients in Europe from a Provider Perspective: A Cross-Sectional Survey
title_sort current treatment of cleft patients in europe from a provider perspective: a cross-sectional survey
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9518109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36078357
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710638
work_keys_str_mv AT franciscoines currenttreatmentofcleftpatientsineuropefromaproviderperspectiveacrosssectionalsurvey
AT antonarakisgregorys currenttreatmentofcleftpatientsineuropefromaproviderperspectiveacrosssectionalsurvey
AT caramelofrancisco currenttreatmentofcleftpatientsineuropefromaproviderperspectiveacrosssectionalsurvey
AT paulaanabelabaptista currenttreatmentofcleftpatientsineuropefromaproviderperspectiveacrosssectionalsurvey
AT martocarlosmiguel currenttreatmentofcleftpatientsineuropefromaproviderperspectiveacrosssectionalsurvey
AT carrilhoeunice currenttreatmentofcleftpatientsineuropefromaproviderperspectiveacrosssectionalsurvey
AT fernandesmariahelena currenttreatmentofcleftpatientsineuropefromaproviderperspectiveacrosssectionalsurvey
AT valefrancisco currenttreatmentofcleftpatientsineuropefromaproviderperspectiveacrosssectionalsurvey