Cargando…

Surveillance of WHO Priority Gram-Negative Pathogenic Bacteria in Effluents from Two Seafood Processing Facilities in Tema, Ghana, 2021 and 2022: A Descriptive Study

Antimicrobial resistant (AMR) bacteria in effluents from seafood processing facilities can contribute to the spread of AMR in the natural environment. In this study conducted in Tema, Ghana, a total of 38 effluent samples from two seafood processing facilities were collected during 2021 and 2022, as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agyarkwa, Meldon Ansah-koi, Azaglo, Godfred Saviour Kudjo, Kokofu, Henry Kwabena, Appah-Sampong, Ebenezer Kwabena, Nerquaye-Tetteh, Esi Nana, Appoh, Emmanuel, Kudjawu, Jewel, Worlanyo, Ebenezer, Batong, Mariam Fuowie, Akumwena, Amos, Labi, Appiah-Korang, Osei, Mary-Magdalene, Satyanarayana, Srinath, Terry, Robert Fraser, Manzi, Marcel, Opintan, Japheth A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9518130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36078530
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710823
_version_ 1784799108510253056
author Agyarkwa, Meldon Ansah-koi
Azaglo, Godfred Saviour Kudjo
Kokofu, Henry Kwabena
Appah-Sampong, Ebenezer Kwabena
Nerquaye-Tetteh, Esi Nana
Appoh, Emmanuel
Kudjawu, Jewel
Worlanyo, Ebenezer
Batong, Mariam Fuowie
Akumwena, Amos
Labi, Appiah-Korang
Osei, Mary-Magdalene
Satyanarayana, Srinath
Terry, Robert Fraser
Manzi, Marcel
Opintan, Japheth A.
author_facet Agyarkwa, Meldon Ansah-koi
Azaglo, Godfred Saviour Kudjo
Kokofu, Henry Kwabena
Appah-Sampong, Ebenezer Kwabena
Nerquaye-Tetteh, Esi Nana
Appoh, Emmanuel
Kudjawu, Jewel
Worlanyo, Ebenezer
Batong, Mariam Fuowie
Akumwena, Amos
Labi, Appiah-Korang
Osei, Mary-Magdalene
Satyanarayana, Srinath
Terry, Robert Fraser
Manzi, Marcel
Opintan, Japheth A.
author_sort Agyarkwa, Meldon Ansah-koi
collection PubMed
description Antimicrobial resistant (AMR) bacteria in effluents from seafood processing facilities can contribute to the spread of AMR in the natural environment. In this study conducted in Tema, Ghana, a total of 38 effluent samples from two seafood processing facilities were collected during 2021 and 2022, as part of a pilot surveillance project to ascertain the bacterial load, bacterial species and their resistance to 15 antibiotics belonging to the WHO AWaRe group of antibiotics. The bacterial load in the effluent samples ranged from 13–1800 most probable number (MPN)/100 mL. We identified the following bacterial species: E. coli in 31 (82%) samples, K. pneumoniae in 15 (39%) samples, Proteus spp. in 6 (16%) samples, P. aeruginosa in 2 (5%) samples and A. baumannii in 2 (5%) samples. The highest levels of antibiotic resistance (100%) were recorded for ampicillin and cefuroxime among Enterobacteriaceae. The WHO priority pathogens—E. coli (resistant to cefotaxime, ceftazidime and carbapenem) and K. pneumoniae (resistant to ceftriaxone)—were found in 5 (13%) effluent samples. These findings highlight the need for enhanced surveillance to identify the source of AMR and multi-drug resistant bacteria and an adoption of best practices to eliminate these bacteria in the ecosystem of the seafood processing facilities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9518130
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95181302022-09-29 Surveillance of WHO Priority Gram-Negative Pathogenic Bacteria in Effluents from Two Seafood Processing Facilities in Tema, Ghana, 2021 and 2022: A Descriptive Study Agyarkwa, Meldon Ansah-koi Azaglo, Godfred Saviour Kudjo Kokofu, Henry Kwabena Appah-Sampong, Ebenezer Kwabena Nerquaye-Tetteh, Esi Nana Appoh, Emmanuel Kudjawu, Jewel Worlanyo, Ebenezer Batong, Mariam Fuowie Akumwena, Amos Labi, Appiah-Korang Osei, Mary-Magdalene Satyanarayana, Srinath Terry, Robert Fraser Manzi, Marcel Opintan, Japheth A. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Antimicrobial resistant (AMR) bacteria in effluents from seafood processing facilities can contribute to the spread of AMR in the natural environment. In this study conducted in Tema, Ghana, a total of 38 effluent samples from two seafood processing facilities were collected during 2021 and 2022, as part of a pilot surveillance project to ascertain the bacterial load, bacterial species and their resistance to 15 antibiotics belonging to the WHO AWaRe group of antibiotics. The bacterial load in the effluent samples ranged from 13–1800 most probable number (MPN)/100 mL. We identified the following bacterial species: E. coli in 31 (82%) samples, K. pneumoniae in 15 (39%) samples, Proteus spp. in 6 (16%) samples, P. aeruginosa in 2 (5%) samples and A. baumannii in 2 (5%) samples. The highest levels of antibiotic resistance (100%) were recorded for ampicillin and cefuroxime among Enterobacteriaceae. The WHO priority pathogens—E. coli (resistant to cefotaxime, ceftazidime and carbapenem) and K. pneumoniae (resistant to ceftriaxone)—were found in 5 (13%) effluent samples. These findings highlight the need for enhanced surveillance to identify the source of AMR and multi-drug resistant bacteria and an adoption of best practices to eliminate these bacteria in the ecosystem of the seafood processing facilities. MDPI 2022-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9518130/ /pubmed/36078530 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710823 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Agyarkwa, Meldon Ansah-koi
Azaglo, Godfred Saviour Kudjo
Kokofu, Henry Kwabena
Appah-Sampong, Ebenezer Kwabena
Nerquaye-Tetteh, Esi Nana
Appoh, Emmanuel
Kudjawu, Jewel
Worlanyo, Ebenezer
Batong, Mariam Fuowie
Akumwena, Amos
Labi, Appiah-Korang
Osei, Mary-Magdalene
Satyanarayana, Srinath
Terry, Robert Fraser
Manzi, Marcel
Opintan, Japheth A.
Surveillance of WHO Priority Gram-Negative Pathogenic Bacteria in Effluents from Two Seafood Processing Facilities in Tema, Ghana, 2021 and 2022: A Descriptive Study
title Surveillance of WHO Priority Gram-Negative Pathogenic Bacteria in Effluents from Two Seafood Processing Facilities in Tema, Ghana, 2021 and 2022: A Descriptive Study
title_full Surveillance of WHO Priority Gram-Negative Pathogenic Bacteria in Effluents from Two Seafood Processing Facilities in Tema, Ghana, 2021 and 2022: A Descriptive Study
title_fullStr Surveillance of WHO Priority Gram-Negative Pathogenic Bacteria in Effluents from Two Seafood Processing Facilities in Tema, Ghana, 2021 and 2022: A Descriptive Study
title_full_unstemmed Surveillance of WHO Priority Gram-Negative Pathogenic Bacteria in Effluents from Two Seafood Processing Facilities in Tema, Ghana, 2021 and 2022: A Descriptive Study
title_short Surveillance of WHO Priority Gram-Negative Pathogenic Bacteria in Effluents from Two Seafood Processing Facilities in Tema, Ghana, 2021 and 2022: A Descriptive Study
title_sort surveillance of who priority gram-negative pathogenic bacteria in effluents from two seafood processing facilities in tema, ghana, 2021 and 2022: a descriptive study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9518130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36078530
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710823
work_keys_str_mv AT agyarkwameldonansahkoi surveillanceofwhoprioritygramnegativepathogenicbacteriaineffluentsfromtwoseafoodprocessingfacilitiesintemaghana2021and2022adescriptivestudy
AT azaglogodfredsaviourkudjo surveillanceofwhoprioritygramnegativepathogenicbacteriaineffluentsfromtwoseafoodprocessingfacilitiesintemaghana2021and2022adescriptivestudy
AT kokofuhenrykwabena surveillanceofwhoprioritygramnegativepathogenicbacteriaineffluentsfromtwoseafoodprocessingfacilitiesintemaghana2021and2022adescriptivestudy
AT appahsampongebenezerkwabena surveillanceofwhoprioritygramnegativepathogenicbacteriaineffluentsfromtwoseafoodprocessingfacilitiesintemaghana2021and2022adescriptivestudy
AT nerquayetettehesinana surveillanceofwhoprioritygramnegativepathogenicbacteriaineffluentsfromtwoseafoodprocessingfacilitiesintemaghana2021and2022adescriptivestudy
AT appohemmanuel surveillanceofwhoprioritygramnegativepathogenicbacteriaineffluentsfromtwoseafoodprocessingfacilitiesintemaghana2021and2022adescriptivestudy
AT kudjawujewel surveillanceofwhoprioritygramnegativepathogenicbacteriaineffluentsfromtwoseafoodprocessingfacilitiesintemaghana2021and2022adescriptivestudy
AT worlanyoebenezer surveillanceofwhoprioritygramnegativepathogenicbacteriaineffluentsfromtwoseafoodprocessingfacilitiesintemaghana2021and2022adescriptivestudy
AT batongmariamfuowie surveillanceofwhoprioritygramnegativepathogenicbacteriaineffluentsfromtwoseafoodprocessingfacilitiesintemaghana2021and2022adescriptivestudy
AT akumwenaamos surveillanceofwhoprioritygramnegativepathogenicbacteriaineffluentsfromtwoseafoodprocessingfacilitiesintemaghana2021and2022adescriptivestudy
AT labiappiahkorang surveillanceofwhoprioritygramnegativepathogenicbacteriaineffluentsfromtwoseafoodprocessingfacilitiesintemaghana2021and2022adescriptivestudy
AT oseimarymagdalene surveillanceofwhoprioritygramnegativepathogenicbacteriaineffluentsfromtwoseafoodprocessingfacilitiesintemaghana2021and2022adescriptivestudy
AT satyanarayanasrinath surveillanceofwhoprioritygramnegativepathogenicbacteriaineffluentsfromtwoseafoodprocessingfacilitiesintemaghana2021and2022adescriptivestudy
AT terryrobertfraser surveillanceofwhoprioritygramnegativepathogenicbacteriaineffluentsfromtwoseafoodprocessingfacilitiesintemaghana2021and2022adescriptivestudy
AT manzimarcel surveillanceofwhoprioritygramnegativepathogenicbacteriaineffluentsfromtwoseafoodprocessingfacilitiesintemaghana2021and2022adescriptivestudy
AT opintanjaphetha surveillanceofwhoprioritygramnegativepathogenicbacteriaineffluentsfromtwoseafoodprocessingfacilitiesintemaghana2021and2022adescriptivestudy