Cargando…
Green Paradox or Forced Emission Reduction—The Dual Effects of Environmental Regulation on Carbon Emissions
In response to global climate change, China made a commitment about carbon emissions at the UN General Assembly. It will strive to achieve carbon peaking by 2030 and carbon neutrality by 2060. To help China successfully meet its carbon emissions targets this study examines the impact of environmenta...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9518542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36078773 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191711058 |
_version_ | 1784799208949153792 |
---|---|
author | Yin, Kedong Liu, Lu Gu, Haolei |
author_facet | Yin, Kedong Liu, Lu Gu, Haolei |
author_sort | Yin, Kedong |
collection | PubMed |
description | In response to global climate change, China made a commitment about carbon emissions at the UN General Assembly. It will strive to achieve carbon peaking by 2030 and carbon neutrality by 2060. To help China successfully meet its carbon emissions targets this study examines the impact of environmental regulation on carbon emissions from a different perspective. Using panel data from 30 provinces in China as samples, this paper discusses the direct and indirect effect of environmental regulation on carbon emissions and explains the indirect process through four transmission paths: energy consumption structure, industrial structure, technological innovation, and foreign direct investment (FDI). The empirical results show that the direct effect of environmental regulation on carbon emissions presents an inverted U-shaped curve, it means that when the intensity level of environmental regulation is low, it mainly shows the green paradox effect, and with the continuous tightening of environmental laws, it turns into a forced emission reduction on carbon emissions. In addition, we found that under the constraint of environmental regulation conditions, the coal-based energy consumption is still the leading cause of carbon emissions; environmental regulations have contributed to the upgrading of industrial structure and technological advance, which indirectly play a positive role in carbon emission reduction. However, environmental regulation restrains the spillover effect and capital accumulation effect of FDI, which brings a specific degree of hindrance to technological progress and economic development, and is not conducive to carbon emission reduction. Therefore, we have made the following recommendations: China should make reasonable use of environmental policies to regulate carbon emissions according to the situation of each region, optimize the energy structure and increase the proportion of clean energy use, and improve the technology level of related industries to reduce carbon emissions by innovation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9518542 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95185422022-09-29 Green Paradox or Forced Emission Reduction—The Dual Effects of Environmental Regulation on Carbon Emissions Yin, Kedong Liu, Lu Gu, Haolei Int J Environ Res Public Health Article In response to global climate change, China made a commitment about carbon emissions at the UN General Assembly. It will strive to achieve carbon peaking by 2030 and carbon neutrality by 2060. To help China successfully meet its carbon emissions targets this study examines the impact of environmental regulation on carbon emissions from a different perspective. Using panel data from 30 provinces in China as samples, this paper discusses the direct and indirect effect of environmental regulation on carbon emissions and explains the indirect process through four transmission paths: energy consumption structure, industrial structure, technological innovation, and foreign direct investment (FDI). The empirical results show that the direct effect of environmental regulation on carbon emissions presents an inverted U-shaped curve, it means that when the intensity level of environmental regulation is low, it mainly shows the green paradox effect, and with the continuous tightening of environmental laws, it turns into a forced emission reduction on carbon emissions. In addition, we found that under the constraint of environmental regulation conditions, the coal-based energy consumption is still the leading cause of carbon emissions; environmental regulations have contributed to the upgrading of industrial structure and technological advance, which indirectly play a positive role in carbon emission reduction. However, environmental regulation restrains the spillover effect and capital accumulation effect of FDI, which brings a specific degree of hindrance to technological progress and economic development, and is not conducive to carbon emission reduction. Therefore, we have made the following recommendations: China should make reasonable use of environmental policies to regulate carbon emissions according to the situation of each region, optimize the energy structure and increase the proportion of clean energy use, and improve the technology level of related industries to reduce carbon emissions by innovation. MDPI 2022-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9518542/ /pubmed/36078773 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191711058 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Yin, Kedong Liu, Lu Gu, Haolei Green Paradox or Forced Emission Reduction—The Dual Effects of Environmental Regulation on Carbon Emissions |
title | Green Paradox or Forced Emission Reduction—The Dual Effects of Environmental Regulation on Carbon Emissions |
title_full | Green Paradox or Forced Emission Reduction—The Dual Effects of Environmental Regulation on Carbon Emissions |
title_fullStr | Green Paradox or Forced Emission Reduction—The Dual Effects of Environmental Regulation on Carbon Emissions |
title_full_unstemmed | Green Paradox or Forced Emission Reduction—The Dual Effects of Environmental Regulation on Carbon Emissions |
title_short | Green Paradox or Forced Emission Reduction—The Dual Effects of Environmental Regulation on Carbon Emissions |
title_sort | green paradox or forced emission reduction—the dual effects of environmental regulation on carbon emissions |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9518542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36078773 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191711058 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yinkedong greenparadoxorforcedemissionreductionthedualeffectsofenvironmentalregulationoncarbonemissions AT liulu greenparadoxorforcedemissionreductionthedualeffectsofenvironmentalregulationoncarbonemissions AT guhaolei greenparadoxorforcedemissionreductionthedualeffectsofenvironmentalregulationoncarbonemissions |