Cargando…
Is Ocular Accommodation Influenced by Dynamic Ambient Illumination and Pupil Size?
Purpose: We investigated ocular accommodative responses and pupil diameters under different light intensities in order to explore whether changes in light intensity aid effective accommodation function training. Methods:A total of 29 emmetropic and myopic subjects (age range: 12–18 years) viewed a t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9518590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36078207 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710490 |
_version_ | 1784799220859928576 |
---|---|
author | Yu, Hanyang Li, Wentao Chen, Ziping Chen, Mengzhen Zeng, Junwen Lin, Xijiang Zhao, Feng |
author_facet | Yu, Hanyang Li, Wentao Chen, Ziping Chen, Mengzhen Zeng, Junwen Lin, Xijiang Zhao, Feng |
author_sort | Yu, Hanyang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: We investigated ocular accommodative responses and pupil diameters under different light intensities in order to explore whether changes in light intensity aid effective accommodation function training. Methods:A total of 29 emmetropic and myopic subjects (age range: 12–18 years) viewed a target in dynamic ambient light (luminance: 5, 100, 200, 500, 1000, 2000 and 3000 lux) and static ambient light (luminance: 1000 lux) at a 40 cm distance with refractive correction. Accommodation and pupil diameter were recorded using an open-field infrared autorefractor and an ultrasound biological microscope, respectively. Results: The changes in the amplitude of accommodative response and pupil diameter under dynamic lighting were 1.01 ± 0.53 D and 2.80 ± 0.75 mm, respectively, whereas in static lighting, those values were 0.43 ± 0.24 D and 0.77 ± 0.27 mm, respectively. The amplitude of accommodation and pupil diameter change in dynamic lighting (t = 6.097, p < 0.001) was significantly larger than that under static lighting (t = 16.115, p < 0.001).The effects of light level on both accommodation and pupil diameter were significant (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Accommodation was positively correlated with light intensity. The difference was about 1.0 D in the range of 0–3000 lux, which may lay the foundation for accommodative training through light intervention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9518590 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95185902022-09-29 Is Ocular Accommodation Influenced by Dynamic Ambient Illumination and Pupil Size? Yu, Hanyang Li, Wentao Chen, Ziping Chen, Mengzhen Zeng, Junwen Lin, Xijiang Zhao, Feng Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Purpose: We investigated ocular accommodative responses and pupil diameters under different light intensities in order to explore whether changes in light intensity aid effective accommodation function training. Methods:A total of 29 emmetropic and myopic subjects (age range: 12–18 years) viewed a target in dynamic ambient light (luminance: 5, 100, 200, 500, 1000, 2000 and 3000 lux) and static ambient light (luminance: 1000 lux) at a 40 cm distance with refractive correction. Accommodation and pupil diameter were recorded using an open-field infrared autorefractor and an ultrasound biological microscope, respectively. Results: The changes in the amplitude of accommodative response and pupil diameter under dynamic lighting were 1.01 ± 0.53 D and 2.80 ± 0.75 mm, respectively, whereas in static lighting, those values were 0.43 ± 0.24 D and 0.77 ± 0.27 mm, respectively. The amplitude of accommodation and pupil diameter change in dynamic lighting (t = 6.097, p < 0.001) was significantly larger than that under static lighting (t = 16.115, p < 0.001).The effects of light level on both accommodation and pupil diameter were significant (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Accommodation was positively correlated with light intensity. The difference was about 1.0 D in the range of 0–3000 lux, which may lay the foundation for accommodative training through light intervention. MDPI 2022-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9518590/ /pubmed/36078207 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710490 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Yu, Hanyang Li, Wentao Chen, Ziping Chen, Mengzhen Zeng, Junwen Lin, Xijiang Zhao, Feng Is Ocular Accommodation Influenced by Dynamic Ambient Illumination and Pupil Size? |
title | Is Ocular Accommodation Influenced by Dynamic Ambient Illumination and Pupil Size? |
title_full | Is Ocular Accommodation Influenced by Dynamic Ambient Illumination and Pupil Size? |
title_fullStr | Is Ocular Accommodation Influenced by Dynamic Ambient Illumination and Pupil Size? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is Ocular Accommodation Influenced by Dynamic Ambient Illumination and Pupil Size? |
title_short | Is Ocular Accommodation Influenced by Dynamic Ambient Illumination and Pupil Size? |
title_sort | is ocular accommodation influenced by dynamic ambient illumination and pupil size? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9518590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36078207 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710490 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuhanyang isocularaccommodationinfluencedbydynamicambientilluminationandpupilsize AT liwentao isocularaccommodationinfluencedbydynamicambientilluminationandpupilsize AT chenziping isocularaccommodationinfluencedbydynamicambientilluminationandpupilsize AT chenmengzhen isocularaccommodationinfluencedbydynamicambientilluminationandpupilsize AT zengjunwen isocularaccommodationinfluencedbydynamicambientilluminationandpupilsize AT linxijiang isocularaccommodationinfluencedbydynamicambientilluminationandpupilsize AT zhaofeng isocularaccommodationinfluencedbydynamicambientilluminationandpupilsize |