Cargando…

Is Ocular Accommodation Influenced by Dynamic Ambient Illumination and Pupil Size?

Purpose: We investigated ocular accommodative responses and pupil diameters under different light intensities in order to explore whether changes in light intensity aid effective accommodation function training. Methods:A total of 29 emmetropic and myopic subjects (age range: 12–18 years) viewed a t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Hanyang, Li, Wentao, Chen, Ziping, Chen, Mengzhen, Zeng, Junwen, Lin, Xijiang, Zhao, Feng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9518590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36078207
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710490
_version_ 1784799220859928576
author Yu, Hanyang
Li, Wentao
Chen, Ziping
Chen, Mengzhen
Zeng, Junwen
Lin, Xijiang
Zhao, Feng
author_facet Yu, Hanyang
Li, Wentao
Chen, Ziping
Chen, Mengzhen
Zeng, Junwen
Lin, Xijiang
Zhao, Feng
author_sort Yu, Hanyang
collection PubMed
description Purpose: We investigated ocular accommodative responses and pupil diameters under different light intensities in order to explore whether changes in light intensity aid effective accommodation function training. Methods:A total of 29 emmetropic and myopic subjects (age range: 12–18 years) viewed a target in dynamic ambient light (luminance: 5, 100, 200, 500, 1000, 2000 and 3000 lux) and static ambient light (luminance: 1000 lux) at a 40 cm distance with refractive correction. Accommodation and pupil diameter were recorded using an open-field infrared autorefractor and an ultrasound biological microscope, respectively. Results: The changes in the amplitude of accommodative response and pupil diameter under dynamic lighting were 1.01 ± 0.53 D and 2.80 ± 0.75 mm, respectively, whereas in static lighting, those values were 0.43 ± 0.24 D and 0.77 ± 0.27 mm, respectively. The amplitude of accommodation and pupil diameter change in dynamic lighting (t = 6.097, p < 0.001) was significantly larger than that under static lighting (t = 16.115, p < 0.001).The effects of light level on both accommodation and pupil diameter were significant (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Accommodation was positively correlated with light intensity. The difference was about 1.0 D in the range of 0–3000 lux, which may lay the foundation for accommodative training through light intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9518590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95185902022-09-29 Is Ocular Accommodation Influenced by Dynamic Ambient Illumination and Pupil Size? Yu, Hanyang Li, Wentao Chen, Ziping Chen, Mengzhen Zeng, Junwen Lin, Xijiang Zhao, Feng Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Purpose: We investigated ocular accommodative responses and pupil diameters under different light intensities in order to explore whether changes in light intensity aid effective accommodation function training. Methods:A total of 29 emmetropic and myopic subjects (age range: 12–18 years) viewed a target in dynamic ambient light (luminance: 5, 100, 200, 500, 1000, 2000 and 3000 lux) and static ambient light (luminance: 1000 lux) at a 40 cm distance with refractive correction. Accommodation and pupil diameter were recorded using an open-field infrared autorefractor and an ultrasound biological microscope, respectively. Results: The changes in the amplitude of accommodative response and pupil diameter under dynamic lighting were 1.01 ± 0.53 D and 2.80 ± 0.75 mm, respectively, whereas in static lighting, those values were 0.43 ± 0.24 D and 0.77 ± 0.27 mm, respectively. The amplitude of accommodation and pupil diameter change in dynamic lighting (t = 6.097, p < 0.001) was significantly larger than that under static lighting (t = 16.115, p < 0.001).The effects of light level on both accommodation and pupil diameter were significant (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Accommodation was positively correlated with light intensity. The difference was about 1.0 D in the range of 0–3000 lux, which may lay the foundation for accommodative training through light intervention. MDPI 2022-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9518590/ /pubmed/36078207 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710490 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yu, Hanyang
Li, Wentao
Chen, Ziping
Chen, Mengzhen
Zeng, Junwen
Lin, Xijiang
Zhao, Feng
Is Ocular Accommodation Influenced by Dynamic Ambient Illumination and Pupil Size?
title Is Ocular Accommodation Influenced by Dynamic Ambient Illumination and Pupil Size?
title_full Is Ocular Accommodation Influenced by Dynamic Ambient Illumination and Pupil Size?
title_fullStr Is Ocular Accommodation Influenced by Dynamic Ambient Illumination and Pupil Size?
title_full_unstemmed Is Ocular Accommodation Influenced by Dynamic Ambient Illumination and Pupil Size?
title_short Is Ocular Accommodation Influenced by Dynamic Ambient Illumination and Pupil Size?
title_sort is ocular accommodation influenced by dynamic ambient illumination and pupil size?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9518590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36078207
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710490
work_keys_str_mv AT yuhanyang isocularaccommodationinfluencedbydynamicambientilluminationandpupilsize
AT liwentao isocularaccommodationinfluencedbydynamicambientilluminationandpupilsize
AT chenziping isocularaccommodationinfluencedbydynamicambientilluminationandpupilsize
AT chenmengzhen isocularaccommodationinfluencedbydynamicambientilluminationandpupilsize
AT zengjunwen isocularaccommodationinfluencedbydynamicambientilluminationandpupilsize
AT linxijiang isocularaccommodationinfluencedbydynamicambientilluminationandpupilsize
AT zhaofeng isocularaccommodationinfluencedbydynamicambientilluminationandpupilsize