Cargando…

Lessons Learned from Implementing Unconscious Bias Training at an Academic Medical Center

INTRODUCTION: In 2018, our Midwestern university medical center began offering unconscious bias training. Each session concluded with a standard evaluation. We analyzed two years of data that focused on three areas: 1) whether demographic differences or amount of prior knowledge on the topic influen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luaces, Maria Alonso, Galliart, Julie M., Mabachi, Natabhona M., Zackula, Rosalee, Binion, Danielle, McGee, Jerrihlyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: University of Kansas Medical Center 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9518710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36196107
http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol15.18094
_version_ 1784799248495149056
author Luaces, Maria Alonso
Galliart, Julie M.
Mabachi, Natabhona M.
Zackula, Rosalee
Binion, Danielle
McGee, Jerrihlyn
author_facet Luaces, Maria Alonso
Galliart, Julie M.
Mabachi, Natabhona M.
Zackula, Rosalee
Binion, Danielle
McGee, Jerrihlyn
author_sort Luaces, Maria Alonso
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In 2018, our Midwestern university medical center began offering unconscious bias training. Each session concluded with a standard evaluation. We analyzed two years of data that focused on three areas: 1) whether demographic differences or amount of prior knowledge on the topic influenced the training experience; 2) what participants liked best about the training; and 3) whether participants’ stated intentions to apply their learning at the end of the training aligned with institutional goals of the training. METHODS: Participants attended sessions open to the campus community pre-scheduled by the Office for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion and posted on its website. Chi-square tests were utilized to test associations between outcomes and questionnaire responses. Outcome measures included race/ethnicity, prior knowledge level, and overall rating of the training. Thematic analysis was used to code comments and establish themes from two open-ended survey questions. RESULTS: Significant differences were found by race and ethnicity for all questionnaire responses; each were p < 0.001. Those who reported they had advanced/expert knowledge on the topic were less likely to report the training increased their knowledge, and those who reported their race as White/Caucasian tended to give the training the highest overall rating, as did heterosexuals. Through thematic analysis, participants valued the interactive nature of the training sessions, the use of storytelling, and the safety of the learning environment. Participants’ intention to apply their learning indicated they had gained general awareness of bias and settings where it might influence their work. CONCLUSIONS: In an effort to foster a better working and learning environment for those who are underrepresented in the health professions, training was provide that may not have met the expectations of all participants. At the same time, participants who identified as White clearly increased their awareness of bias. Therefore, it is recommended to move away from one-size-fits-all unconscious bias training and develop a robust training continuum to provide ongoing advancement for diverse audiences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9518710
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher University of Kansas Medical Center
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95187102022-10-03 Lessons Learned from Implementing Unconscious Bias Training at an Academic Medical Center Luaces, Maria Alonso Galliart, Julie M. Mabachi, Natabhona M. Zackula, Rosalee Binion, Danielle McGee, Jerrihlyn Kans J Med Original Research INTRODUCTION: In 2018, our Midwestern university medical center began offering unconscious bias training. Each session concluded with a standard evaluation. We analyzed two years of data that focused on three areas: 1) whether demographic differences or amount of prior knowledge on the topic influenced the training experience; 2) what participants liked best about the training; and 3) whether participants’ stated intentions to apply their learning at the end of the training aligned with institutional goals of the training. METHODS: Participants attended sessions open to the campus community pre-scheduled by the Office for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion and posted on its website. Chi-square tests were utilized to test associations between outcomes and questionnaire responses. Outcome measures included race/ethnicity, prior knowledge level, and overall rating of the training. Thematic analysis was used to code comments and establish themes from two open-ended survey questions. RESULTS: Significant differences were found by race and ethnicity for all questionnaire responses; each were p < 0.001. Those who reported they had advanced/expert knowledge on the topic were less likely to report the training increased their knowledge, and those who reported their race as White/Caucasian tended to give the training the highest overall rating, as did heterosexuals. Through thematic analysis, participants valued the interactive nature of the training sessions, the use of storytelling, and the safety of the learning environment. Participants’ intention to apply their learning indicated they had gained general awareness of bias and settings where it might influence their work. CONCLUSIONS: In an effort to foster a better working and learning environment for those who are underrepresented in the health professions, training was provide that may not have met the expectations of all participants. At the same time, participants who identified as White clearly increased their awareness of bias. Therefore, it is recommended to move away from one-size-fits-all unconscious bias training and develop a robust training continuum to provide ongoing advancement for diverse audiences. University of Kansas Medical Center 2022-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9518710/ /pubmed/36196107 http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol15.18094 Text en © 2022 The University of Kansas Medical Center https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Research
Luaces, Maria Alonso
Galliart, Julie M.
Mabachi, Natabhona M.
Zackula, Rosalee
Binion, Danielle
McGee, Jerrihlyn
Lessons Learned from Implementing Unconscious Bias Training at an Academic Medical Center
title Lessons Learned from Implementing Unconscious Bias Training at an Academic Medical Center
title_full Lessons Learned from Implementing Unconscious Bias Training at an Academic Medical Center
title_fullStr Lessons Learned from Implementing Unconscious Bias Training at an Academic Medical Center
title_full_unstemmed Lessons Learned from Implementing Unconscious Bias Training at an Academic Medical Center
title_short Lessons Learned from Implementing Unconscious Bias Training at an Academic Medical Center
title_sort lessons learned from implementing unconscious bias training at an academic medical center
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9518710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36196107
http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol15.18094
work_keys_str_mv AT luacesmariaalonso lessonslearnedfromimplementingunconsciousbiastrainingatanacademicmedicalcenter
AT galliartjuliem lessonslearnedfromimplementingunconsciousbiastrainingatanacademicmedicalcenter
AT mabachinatabhonam lessonslearnedfromimplementingunconsciousbiastrainingatanacademicmedicalcenter
AT zackularosalee lessonslearnedfromimplementingunconsciousbiastrainingatanacademicmedicalcenter
AT biniondanielle lessonslearnedfromimplementingunconsciousbiastrainingatanacademicmedicalcenter
AT mcgeejerrihlyn lessonslearnedfromimplementingunconsciousbiastrainingatanacademicmedicalcenter