Cargando…

GWAS in the southern African context

Researchers would generally adjust for the possible confounding effect of population structure by considering global ancestry proportions or top principle components. Alternatively, researchers would conduct admixture mapping to increase the power to detect variants with an ancestry effect. This is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Swart, Yolandi, van Eeden, Gerald, Uren, Caitlin, van der Spuy, Gian, Tromp, Gerard, Möller, Marlo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9518849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36170230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264657
_version_ 1784799274251321344
author Swart, Yolandi
van Eeden, Gerald
Uren, Caitlin
van der Spuy, Gian
Tromp, Gerard
Möller, Marlo
author_facet Swart, Yolandi
van Eeden, Gerald
Uren, Caitlin
van der Spuy, Gian
Tromp, Gerard
Möller, Marlo
author_sort Swart, Yolandi
collection PubMed
description Researchers would generally adjust for the possible confounding effect of population structure by considering global ancestry proportions or top principle components. Alternatively, researchers would conduct admixture mapping to increase the power to detect variants with an ancestry effect. This is sufficient in simple admixture scenarios, however, populations from southern Africa can be complex multi-way admixed populations. Duan et al. (2018) first described local ancestry adjusted allelic (LAAA) analysis as a robust method for discovering association signals, while producing minimal false positive hits. Their simulation study, however, was limited to a two-way admixed population. Realizing that their findings might not translate to other admixture scenarios, we simulated a three- and five-way admixed population to compare the LAAA model to other models commonly used in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). We found that, given our admixture scenarios, the LAAA model identifies the most causal variants in most of the phenotypes we tested across both the three-way and five-way admixed populations. The LAAA model also produced a high number of false positive hits which was potentially caused by the ancestry effect size that we assumed. Considering the extent to which the various models tested differed in their results and considering that the source of a given association is unknown, we recommend that researchers use multiple GWAS models when analysing populations with complex ancestry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9518849
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95188492022-09-29 GWAS in the southern African context Swart, Yolandi van Eeden, Gerald Uren, Caitlin van der Spuy, Gian Tromp, Gerard Möller, Marlo PLoS One Research Article Researchers would generally adjust for the possible confounding effect of population structure by considering global ancestry proportions or top principle components. Alternatively, researchers would conduct admixture mapping to increase the power to detect variants with an ancestry effect. This is sufficient in simple admixture scenarios, however, populations from southern Africa can be complex multi-way admixed populations. Duan et al. (2018) first described local ancestry adjusted allelic (LAAA) analysis as a robust method for discovering association signals, while producing minimal false positive hits. Their simulation study, however, was limited to a two-way admixed population. Realizing that their findings might not translate to other admixture scenarios, we simulated a three- and five-way admixed population to compare the LAAA model to other models commonly used in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). We found that, given our admixture scenarios, the LAAA model identifies the most causal variants in most of the phenotypes we tested across both the three-way and five-way admixed populations. The LAAA model also produced a high number of false positive hits which was potentially caused by the ancestry effect size that we assumed. Considering the extent to which the various models tested differed in their results and considering that the source of a given association is unknown, we recommend that researchers use multiple GWAS models when analysing populations with complex ancestry. Public Library of Science 2022-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9518849/ /pubmed/36170230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264657 Text en © 2022 Swart et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Swart, Yolandi
van Eeden, Gerald
Uren, Caitlin
van der Spuy, Gian
Tromp, Gerard
Möller, Marlo
GWAS in the southern African context
title GWAS in the southern African context
title_full GWAS in the southern African context
title_fullStr GWAS in the southern African context
title_full_unstemmed GWAS in the southern African context
title_short GWAS in the southern African context
title_sort gwas in the southern african context
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9518849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36170230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264657
work_keys_str_mv AT swartyolandi gwasinthesouthernafricancontext
AT vaneedengerald gwasinthesouthernafricancontext
AT urencaitlin gwasinthesouthernafricancontext
AT vanderspuygian gwasinthesouthernafricancontext
AT trompgerard gwasinthesouthernafricancontext
AT mollermarlo gwasinthesouthernafricancontext