Cargando…

Changes in lung volume estimated by electrical impedance tomography during apnea and high-flow nasal oxygenation: A single-center randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Previous studies concerning humidified, heated high-flow nasal oxygen delivered in spontaneously breathing patients postulated an increase in functional residual capacity as one of its physiological effects. It is unclear wheter this is also true for patients under general anesthesia. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Riedel, Thomas, Bürgi, Fabian, Greif, Robert, Kaiser, Heiko, Riva, Thomas, Theiler, Lorenz, Nabecker, Sabine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9518885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36170281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273120
_version_ 1784799283328843776
author Riedel, Thomas
Bürgi, Fabian
Greif, Robert
Kaiser, Heiko
Riva, Thomas
Theiler, Lorenz
Nabecker, Sabine
author_facet Riedel, Thomas
Bürgi, Fabian
Greif, Robert
Kaiser, Heiko
Riva, Thomas
Theiler, Lorenz
Nabecker, Sabine
author_sort Riedel, Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies concerning humidified, heated high-flow nasal oxygen delivered in spontaneously breathing patients postulated an increase in functional residual capacity as one of its physiological effects. It is unclear wheter this is also true for patients under general anesthesia. METHODOLOGY: The sincle-center noninferiority trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT NCT03478774). This secondary outcome analysis shows estimated differences in lung volume changes using electrical impedance tomography between different flow rates of 100% oxygen in apneic, anesthetized and paralyzed adults prior to intubation. One hundred and twenty five patients were randomized to five groups with different flow rates of 100% oxygen: i) minimal-flow: 0.25 l.min(-1) via endotracheal tube; ii) low-flow: 2 l.min(-1) + continuous jaw thrust; iii) medium-flow: 10 l.min(-1) + continuous jaw thrust; iv) high-flow: 70l.min(-1) + continuous jaw thrust; and v) control: 70 l.min(-1) + continuous video-laryngoscopy. After standardized anesthesia induction with non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade, the 15-minute apnea period and oxygen delivery was started according to the randomized flow rate. Continuous electrical impedance tomography measurements were performed during the 15-minute apnea period. Total change in lung impedance (an estimate of changes in lung volume) over the 15-minute apnea period and times to 25%, 50% and 75% of total impedance change were calculated. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty five patients completed the original study. Six patients did not complete the 15-minute apnea period. Due to maloperation, malfunction and artefacts additional 54 measurements had to be excluded, resulting in 65 patients included into this secondary outcome analysis. We found no differences between groups with respect to decrease in lung impedance or curve progression over the observation period. CONCLUSIONS: Different flow rates of humidified 100% oxygen during apnea result in comparable decreases in lung volumes. The demonstrated increase in functional residual capacity during spontaneous breathing with high-flow nasal oxygenation could not be replicated during apnea under general anesthesia with neuromuscular blockade.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9518885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95188852022-09-29 Changes in lung volume estimated by electrical impedance tomography during apnea and high-flow nasal oxygenation: A single-center randomized controlled trial Riedel, Thomas Bürgi, Fabian Greif, Robert Kaiser, Heiko Riva, Thomas Theiler, Lorenz Nabecker, Sabine PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Previous studies concerning humidified, heated high-flow nasal oxygen delivered in spontaneously breathing patients postulated an increase in functional residual capacity as one of its physiological effects. It is unclear wheter this is also true for patients under general anesthesia. METHODOLOGY: The sincle-center noninferiority trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT NCT03478774). This secondary outcome analysis shows estimated differences in lung volume changes using electrical impedance tomography between different flow rates of 100% oxygen in apneic, anesthetized and paralyzed adults prior to intubation. One hundred and twenty five patients were randomized to five groups with different flow rates of 100% oxygen: i) minimal-flow: 0.25 l.min(-1) via endotracheal tube; ii) low-flow: 2 l.min(-1) + continuous jaw thrust; iii) medium-flow: 10 l.min(-1) + continuous jaw thrust; iv) high-flow: 70l.min(-1) + continuous jaw thrust; and v) control: 70 l.min(-1) + continuous video-laryngoscopy. After standardized anesthesia induction with non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade, the 15-minute apnea period and oxygen delivery was started according to the randomized flow rate. Continuous electrical impedance tomography measurements were performed during the 15-minute apnea period. Total change in lung impedance (an estimate of changes in lung volume) over the 15-minute apnea period and times to 25%, 50% and 75% of total impedance change were calculated. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty five patients completed the original study. Six patients did not complete the 15-minute apnea period. Due to maloperation, malfunction and artefacts additional 54 measurements had to be excluded, resulting in 65 patients included into this secondary outcome analysis. We found no differences between groups with respect to decrease in lung impedance or curve progression over the observation period. CONCLUSIONS: Different flow rates of humidified 100% oxygen during apnea result in comparable decreases in lung volumes. The demonstrated increase in functional residual capacity during spontaneous breathing with high-flow nasal oxygenation could not be replicated during apnea under general anesthesia with neuromuscular blockade. Public Library of Science 2022-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9518885/ /pubmed/36170281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273120 Text en © 2022 Riedel et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Riedel, Thomas
Bürgi, Fabian
Greif, Robert
Kaiser, Heiko
Riva, Thomas
Theiler, Lorenz
Nabecker, Sabine
Changes in lung volume estimated by electrical impedance tomography during apnea and high-flow nasal oxygenation: A single-center randomized controlled trial
title Changes in lung volume estimated by electrical impedance tomography during apnea and high-flow nasal oxygenation: A single-center randomized controlled trial
title_full Changes in lung volume estimated by electrical impedance tomography during apnea and high-flow nasal oxygenation: A single-center randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Changes in lung volume estimated by electrical impedance tomography during apnea and high-flow nasal oxygenation: A single-center randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Changes in lung volume estimated by electrical impedance tomography during apnea and high-flow nasal oxygenation: A single-center randomized controlled trial
title_short Changes in lung volume estimated by electrical impedance tomography during apnea and high-flow nasal oxygenation: A single-center randomized controlled trial
title_sort changes in lung volume estimated by electrical impedance tomography during apnea and high-flow nasal oxygenation: a single-center randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9518885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36170281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273120
work_keys_str_mv AT riedelthomas changesinlungvolumeestimatedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyduringapneaandhighflownasaloxygenationasinglecenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT burgifabian changesinlungvolumeestimatedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyduringapneaandhighflownasaloxygenationasinglecenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT greifrobert changesinlungvolumeestimatedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyduringapneaandhighflownasaloxygenationasinglecenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kaiserheiko changesinlungvolumeestimatedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyduringapneaandhighflownasaloxygenationasinglecenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rivathomas changesinlungvolumeestimatedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyduringapneaandhighflownasaloxygenationasinglecenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT theilerlorenz changesinlungvolumeestimatedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyduringapneaandhighflownasaloxygenationasinglecenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nabeckersabine changesinlungvolumeestimatedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyduringapneaandhighflownasaloxygenationasinglecenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial