Cargando…
“There is a hell and heaven difference among faculties who are from quota and those who are non-quota”: under the veneer of the “New Middle Class” production of Indian public universities
The university is a highly politicized and fractious realm for students and academics. Amidst trade-offs between the processes of massification, democratization, commodification, and globalization, the question of transformation for sustainability has become crucial to the social good(s) of higher e...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9518948/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36193174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00932-7 |
_version_ | 1784799298202894336 |
---|---|
author | Dhawan, Nandita Banerjee Belluigi, Dina Zoe Idahosa, Grace Ese-Osa |
author_facet | Dhawan, Nandita Banerjee Belluigi, Dina Zoe Idahosa, Grace Ese-Osa |
author_sort | Dhawan, Nandita Banerjee |
collection | PubMed |
description | The university is a highly politicized and fractious realm for students and academics. Amidst trade-offs between the processes of massification, democratization, commodification, and globalization, the question of transformation for sustainability has become crucial to the social good(s) of higher education. This paper considers academic citizenry within Indian public higher education — a context where the increase in the enrollment of first-generation students and female students, due to affirmative action policies, has not substantially translated into altering the composition of academic staff. Informed by a mixed-method study conducted in 2019 with the participation of academics and those in leadership positions at four higher education institutions, we found that the enactment of such policies was operationalized for the production of the “New Middle Class” by universities. Of concern is that neither the representation nor the participation of academics who are women, “lower” castes, or minorities meets the mark of just, inclusive institutions. Despite the rhetoric of inclusiveness and development, the implementation of related policies clothe subalterns with the veneer of the intellectual class, permitting access on condition that sociocultural identities are concealed, and the hegemonic status quo maintained. Terms such as “quality” and “equality” function as tools for social control rather than serving social justice, where assertions of caste identity and resistance are simultaneously repudiated and misrecognized. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9518948 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95189482022-09-29 “There is a hell and heaven difference among faculties who are from quota and those who are non-quota”: under the veneer of the “New Middle Class” production of Indian public universities Dhawan, Nandita Banerjee Belluigi, Dina Zoe Idahosa, Grace Ese-Osa High Educ (Dordr) Article The university is a highly politicized and fractious realm for students and academics. Amidst trade-offs between the processes of massification, democratization, commodification, and globalization, the question of transformation for sustainability has become crucial to the social good(s) of higher education. This paper considers academic citizenry within Indian public higher education — a context where the increase in the enrollment of first-generation students and female students, due to affirmative action policies, has not substantially translated into altering the composition of academic staff. Informed by a mixed-method study conducted in 2019 with the participation of academics and those in leadership positions at four higher education institutions, we found that the enactment of such policies was operationalized for the production of the “New Middle Class” by universities. Of concern is that neither the representation nor the participation of academics who are women, “lower” castes, or minorities meets the mark of just, inclusive institutions. Despite the rhetoric of inclusiveness and development, the implementation of related policies clothe subalterns with the veneer of the intellectual class, permitting access on condition that sociocultural identities are concealed, and the hegemonic status quo maintained. Terms such as “quality” and “equality” function as tools for social control rather than serving social justice, where assertions of caste identity and resistance are simultaneously repudiated and misrecognized. Springer Netherlands 2022-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9518948/ /pubmed/36193174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00932-7 Text en © Crown 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Dhawan, Nandita Banerjee Belluigi, Dina Zoe Idahosa, Grace Ese-Osa “There is a hell and heaven difference among faculties who are from quota and those who are non-quota”: under the veneer of the “New Middle Class” production of Indian public universities |
title | “There is a hell and heaven difference among faculties who are from quota and those who are non-quota”: under the veneer of the “New Middle Class” production of Indian public universities |
title_full | “There is a hell and heaven difference among faculties who are from quota and those who are non-quota”: under the veneer of the “New Middle Class” production of Indian public universities |
title_fullStr | “There is a hell and heaven difference among faculties who are from quota and those who are non-quota”: under the veneer of the “New Middle Class” production of Indian public universities |
title_full_unstemmed | “There is a hell and heaven difference among faculties who are from quota and those who are non-quota”: under the veneer of the “New Middle Class” production of Indian public universities |
title_short | “There is a hell and heaven difference among faculties who are from quota and those who are non-quota”: under the veneer of the “New Middle Class” production of Indian public universities |
title_sort | “there is a hell and heaven difference among faculties who are from quota and those who are non-quota”: under the veneer of the “new middle class” production of indian public universities |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9518948/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36193174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00932-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dhawannanditabanerjee thereisahellandheavendifferenceamongfacultieswhoarefromquotaandthosewhoarenonquotaundertheveneerofthenewmiddleclassproductionofindianpublicuniversities AT belluigidinazoe thereisahellandheavendifferenceamongfacultieswhoarefromquotaandthosewhoarenonquotaundertheveneerofthenewmiddleclassproductionofindianpublicuniversities AT idahosagraceeseosa thereisahellandheavendifferenceamongfacultieswhoarefromquotaandthosewhoarenonquotaundertheveneerofthenewmiddleclassproductionofindianpublicuniversities |