Cargando…

Use of a non-endoscopic immunocytological device (Cytosponge™) for post chemoradiotherapy surveillance in patients with oesophageal cancer in the UK (CYTOFLOC): A multicentre feasibility study

BACKGROUND: Effective surveillance strategies are required for patients diagnosed with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) or adenocarcinoma (OAC) for whom chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is used as a potentially-curative, organ-sparing, alternative to surgery. In this study, we evaluated the safety,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Christopher M., O'Connor, Heather, O'Donovan, Maria, Hayward, Daniel, Blasko, Adrienn, Harman, Ruth, Malhotra, Shalini, Debiram-Beecham, Irene, Alias, Bincy, Bailey, Adam, Bateman, Andrew, Crosby, Tom D.L., Falk, Stephen, Gollins, Simon, Hawkins, Maria A., Kadri, Sudarshan, Levy, Stephanie, Radhakrishna, Ganesh, Roy, Rajarshi, Sripadam, Raj, Fitzgerald, Rebecca C., Mukherjee, Somnath
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9519482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36187722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101664
_version_ 1784799409355096064
author Jones, Christopher M.
O'Connor, Heather
O'Donovan, Maria
Hayward, Daniel
Blasko, Adrienn
Harman, Ruth
Malhotra, Shalini
Debiram-Beecham, Irene
Alias, Bincy
Bailey, Adam
Bateman, Andrew
Crosby, Tom D.L.
Falk, Stephen
Gollins, Simon
Hawkins, Maria A.
Kadri, Sudarshan
Levy, Stephanie
Radhakrishna, Ganesh
Roy, Rajarshi
Sripadam, Raj
Fitzgerald, Rebecca C.
Mukherjee, Somnath
author_facet Jones, Christopher M.
O'Connor, Heather
O'Donovan, Maria
Hayward, Daniel
Blasko, Adrienn
Harman, Ruth
Malhotra, Shalini
Debiram-Beecham, Irene
Alias, Bincy
Bailey, Adam
Bateman, Andrew
Crosby, Tom D.L.
Falk, Stephen
Gollins, Simon
Hawkins, Maria A.
Kadri, Sudarshan
Levy, Stephanie
Radhakrishna, Ganesh
Roy, Rajarshi
Sripadam, Raj
Fitzgerald, Rebecca C.
Mukherjee, Somnath
author_sort Jones, Christopher M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Effective surveillance strategies are required for patients diagnosed with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) or adenocarcinoma (OAC) for whom chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is used as a potentially-curative, organ-sparing, alternative to surgery. In this study, we evaluated the safety, acceptability and tolerability of a non-endoscopic immunocytological device (the Cytosponge™) to assess treatment response following CRT. METHODS: This multicentre, single-arm feasibility trial took place in 10 tertiary cancer centres in the UK. Patients aged at least 16 years diagnosed with OSCC or OAC, and who were within 4-16 weeks of completing definitive or neo-adjuvant CRT, were included. Participants were required to have a Mellow-Pinkas dysphagia score of 0-2 and be able to swallow tablets. All patients underwent a single Cytosponge™ assessment in addition to standard of care (which included post-treatment endoscopic evaluation with biopsy for patients undergoing definitive CRT; surgery for those who received neo-adjuvant CRT). The primary outcome was the proportion of consented, evaluable patients who successfully underwent Cytosponge™ assessment. Secondary and tertiary outcomes included safety, study consent rate, acceptance rate, the suitability of obtained samples for biomarker analysis, and the comparative efficacy of Cytosponge™ to standard histology (endoscopy and biopsy or post-resection specimen) in assessing for residual disease. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03529669. FINDINGS: Between 18(th) April 2018 and 16(th) January 2020, 41 (42.7%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 32.7-53.2) of 96 potentially eligible patients consented to participate. Thirty-nine (95.1%, 95% CI 83.5-99.4) successfully carried out the Cytosponge™ procedure. Of these, 37 (95%) would be prepared to repeat the procedure. There were only two grade 1 adverse events attributed to use of the Cytosponge™. Thirty-five (90%) of the completed Cytosponge™ samples were suitable for biomarker analysis; 29 (83%) of these were concordant with endoscopic biopsies, three (9%) had findings suggestive of residual cancer on Cytosponge™ not found on endoscopic biopsies, and three (9%) had residual cancer on endoscopic biopsies not detected by Cytosponge™. INTERPRETATION: Use of the Cytosponge(TM) is safe, tolerable, and acceptable for the assessment of treatment response following CRT in OAC and OSCC. Further evaluation of Cytosponge™ in this setting is warranted. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK, National Institute for Health Research, Medical Research Council.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9519482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95194822022-09-30 Use of a non-endoscopic immunocytological device (Cytosponge™) for post chemoradiotherapy surveillance in patients with oesophageal cancer in the UK (CYTOFLOC): A multicentre feasibility study Jones, Christopher M. O'Connor, Heather O'Donovan, Maria Hayward, Daniel Blasko, Adrienn Harman, Ruth Malhotra, Shalini Debiram-Beecham, Irene Alias, Bincy Bailey, Adam Bateman, Andrew Crosby, Tom D.L. Falk, Stephen Gollins, Simon Hawkins, Maria A. Kadri, Sudarshan Levy, Stephanie Radhakrishna, Ganesh Roy, Rajarshi Sripadam, Raj Fitzgerald, Rebecca C. Mukherjee, Somnath eClinicalMedicine Articles BACKGROUND: Effective surveillance strategies are required for patients diagnosed with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) or adenocarcinoma (OAC) for whom chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is used as a potentially-curative, organ-sparing, alternative to surgery. In this study, we evaluated the safety, acceptability and tolerability of a non-endoscopic immunocytological device (the Cytosponge™) to assess treatment response following CRT. METHODS: This multicentre, single-arm feasibility trial took place in 10 tertiary cancer centres in the UK. Patients aged at least 16 years diagnosed with OSCC or OAC, and who were within 4-16 weeks of completing definitive or neo-adjuvant CRT, were included. Participants were required to have a Mellow-Pinkas dysphagia score of 0-2 and be able to swallow tablets. All patients underwent a single Cytosponge™ assessment in addition to standard of care (which included post-treatment endoscopic evaluation with biopsy for patients undergoing definitive CRT; surgery for those who received neo-adjuvant CRT). The primary outcome was the proportion of consented, evaluable patients who successfully underwent Cytosponge™ assessment. Secondary and tertiary outcomes included safety, study consent rate, acceptance rate, the suitability of obtained samples for biomarker analysis, and the comparative efficacy of Cytosponge™ to standard histology (endoscopy and biopsy or post-resection specimen) in assessing for residual disease. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03529669. FINDINGS: Between 18(th) April 2018 and 16(th) January 2020, 41 (42.7%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 32.7-53.2) of 96 potentially eligible patients consented to participate. Thirty-nine (95.1%, 95% CI 83.5-99.4) successfully carried out the Cytosponge™ procedure. Of these, 37 (95%) would be prepared to repeat the procedure. There were only two grade 1 adverse events attributed to use of the Cytosponge™. Thirty-five (90%) of the completed Cytosponge™ samples were suitable for biomarker analysis; 29 (83%) of these were concordant with endoscopic biopsies, three (9%) had findings suggestive of residual cancer on Cytosponge™ not found on endoscopic biopsies, and three (9%) had residual cancer on endoscopic biopsies not detected by Cytosponge™. INTERPRETATION: Use of the Cytosponge(TM) is safe, tolerable, and acceptable for the assessment of treatment response following CRT in OAC and OSCC. Further evaluation of Cytosponge™ in this setting is warranted. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK, National Institute for Health Research, Medical Research Council. Elsevier 2022-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9519482/ /pubmed/36187722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101664 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Jones, Christopher M.
O'Connor, Heather
O'Donovan, Maria
Hayward, Daniel
Blasko, Adrienn
Harman, Ruth
Malhotra, Shalini
Debiram-Beecham, Irene
Alias, Bincy
Bailey, Adam
Bateman, Andrew
Crosby, Tom D.L.
Falk, Stephen
Gollins, Simon
Hawkins, Maria A.
Kadri, Sudarshan
Levy, Stephanie
Radhakrishna, Ganesh
Roy, Rajarshi
Sripadam, Raj
Fitzgerald, Rebecca C.
Mukherjee, Somnath
Use of a non-endoscopic immunocytological device (Cytosponge™) for post chemoradiotherapy surveillance in patients with oesophageal cancer in the UK (CYTOFLOC): A multicentre feasibility study
title Use of a non-endoscopic immunocytological device (Cytosponge™) for post chemoradiotherapy surveillance in patients with oesophageal cancer in the UK (CYTOFLOC): A multicentre feasibility study
title_full Use of a non-endoscopic immunocytological device (Cytosponge™) for post chemoradiotherapy surveillance in patients with oesophageal cancer in the UK (CYTOFLOC): A multicentre feasibility study
title_fullStr Use of a non-endoscopic immunocytological device (Cytosponge™) for post chemoradiotherapy surveillance in patients with oesophageal cancer in the UK (CYTOFLOC): A multicentre feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Use of a non-endoscopic immunocytological device (Cytosponge™) for post chemoradiotherapy surveillance in patients with oesophageal cancer in the UK (CYTOFLOC): A multicentre feasibility study
title_short Use of a non-endoscopic immunocytological device (Cytosponge™) for post chemoradiotherapy surveillance in patients with oesophageal cancer in the UK (CYTOFLOC): A multicentre feasibility study
title_sort use of a non-endoscopic immunocytological device (cytosponge™) for post chemoradiotherapy surveillance in patients with oesophageal cancer in the uk (cytofloc): a multicentre feasibility study
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9519482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36187722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101664
work_keys_str_mv AT joneschristopherm useofanonendoscopicimmunocytologicaldevicecytospongeforpostchemoradiotherapysurveillanceinpatientswithoesophagealcancerintheukcytoflocamulticentrefeasibilitystudy
AT oconnorheather useofanonendoscopicimmunocytologicaldevicecytospongeforpostchemoradiotherapysurveillanceinpatientswithoesophagealcancerintheukcytoflocamulticentrefeasibilitystudy
AT odonovanmaria useofanonendoscopicimmunocytologicaldevicecytospongeforpostchemoradiotherapysurveillanceinpatientswithoesophagealcancerintheukcytoflocamulticentrefeasibilitystudy
AT haywarddaniel useofanonendoscopicimmunocytologicaldevicecytospongeforpostchemoradiotherapysurveillanceinpatientswithoesophagealcancerintheukcytoflocamulticentrefeasibilitystudy
AT blaskoadrienn useofanonendoscopicimmunocytologicaldevicecytospongeforpostchemoradiotherapysurveillanceinpatientswithoesophagealcancerintheukcytoflocamulticentrefeasibilitystudy
AT harmanruth useofanonendoscopicimmunocytologicaldevicecytospongeforpostchemoradiotherapysurveillanceinpatientswithoesophagealcancerintheukcytoflocamulticentrefeasibilitystudy
AT malhotrashalini useofanonendoscopicimmunocytologicaldevicecytospongeforpostchemoradiotherapysurveillanceinpatientswithoesophagealcancerintheukcytoflocamulticentrefeasibilitystudy
AT debirambeechamirene useofanonendoscopicimmunocytologicaldevicecytospongeforpostchemoradiotherapysurveillanceinpatientswithoesophagealcancerintheukcytoflocamulticentrefeasibilitystudy
AT aliasbincy useofanonendoscopicimmunocytologicaldevicecytospongeforpostchemoradiotherapysurveillanceinpatientswithoesophagealcancerintheukcytoflocamulticentrefeasibilitystudy
AT baileyadam useofanonendoscopicimmunocytologicaldevicecytospongeforpostchemoradiotherapysurveillanceinpatientswithoesophagealcancerintheukcytoflocamulticentrefeasibilitystudy
AT batemanandrew useofanonendoscopicimmunocytologicaldevicecytospongeforpostchemoradiotherapysurveillanceinpatientswithoesophagealcancerintheukcytoflocamulticentrefeasibilitystudy
AT crosbytomdl useofanonendoscopicimmunocytologicaldevicecytospongeforpostchemoradiotherapysurveillanceinpatientswithoesophagealcancerintheukcytoflocamulticentrefeasibilitystudy
AT falkstephen useofanonendoscopicimmunocytologicaldevicecytospongeforpostchemoradiotherapysurveillanceinpatientswithoesophagealcancerintheukcytoflocamulticentrefeasibilitystudy
AT gollinssimon useofanonendoscopicimmunocytologicaldevicecytospongeforpostchemoradiotherapysurveillanceinpatientswithoesophagealcancerintheukcytoflocamulticentrefeasibilitystudy
AT hawkinsmariaa useofanonendoscopicimmunocytologicaldevicecytospongeforpostchemoradiotherapysurveillanceinpatientswithoesophagealcancerintheukcytoflocamulticentrefeasibilitystudy
AT kadrisudarshan useofanonendoscopicimmunocytologicaldevicecytospongeforpostchemoradiotherapysurveillanceinpatientswithoesophagealcancerintheukcytoflocamulticentrefeasibilitystudy
AT levystephanie useofanonendoscopicimmunocytologicaldevicecytospongeforpostchemoradiotherapysurveillanceinpatientswithoesophagealcancerintheukcytoflocamulticentrefeasibilitystudy
AT radhakrishnaganesh useofanonendoscopicimmunocytologicaldevicecytospongeforpostchemoradiotherapysurveillanceinpatientswithoesophagealcancerintheukcytoflocamulticentrefeasibilitystudy
AT royrajarshi useofanonendoscopicimmunocytologicaldevicecytospongeforpostchemoradiotherapysurveillanceinpatientswithoesophagealcancerintheukcytoflocamulticentrefeasibilitystudy
AT sripadamraj useofanonendoscopicimmunocytologicaldevicecytospongeforpostchemoradiotherapysurveillanceinpatientswithoesophagealcancerintheukcytoflocamulticentrefeasibilitystudy
AT fitzgeraldrebeccac useofanonendoscopicimmunocytologicaldevicecytospongeforpostchemoradiotherapysurveillanceinpatientswithoesophagealcancerintheukcytoflocamulticentrefeasibilitystudy
AT mukherjeesomnath useofanonendoscopicimmunocytologicaldevicecytospongeforpostchemoradiotherapysurveillanceinpatientswithoesophagealcancerintheukcytoflocamulticentrefeasibilitystudy