Cargando…
Time series-based PM(2.5) concentration prediction in Jing-Jin-Ji area using machine learning algorithm models
Globally all countries encounter air pollution problems along their development path. As a significant indicator of air quality, PM(2.5) concentration has long been proven to be affecting the population’s death rate. Machine learning algorithms proven to outperform traditional statistical approaches...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9519508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36185154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10691 |
_version_ | 1784799415423205376 |
---|---|
author | Ma, Xin Chen, Tengfei Ge, Rubing Cui, Caocao Xu, Fan Lv, Qi |
author_facet | Ma, Xin Chen, Tengfei Ge, Rubing Cui, Caocao Xu, Fan Lv, Qi |
author_sort | Ma, Xin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Globally all countries encounter air pollution problems along their development path. As a significant indicator of air quality, PM(2.5) concentration has long been proven to be affecting the population’s death rate. Machine learning algorithms proven to outperform traditional statistical approaches are widely used in air pollution prediction. However research on the model selection discussion and environmental interpretation of model prediction results is still scarce and urgently needed to lead the policy making on air pollution control. Our research compared four types of machine learning algorisms LinearSVR, K-Nearest Neighbor, Lasso regression, Gradient boosting by looking into their performance in predicting PM(2.5) concentrations among different cities and seasons. The results show that the machine learning model is able to forecast the next day PM(2.5) concentration based on the previous five days' data with better accuracy. The comparative experiments show that based on city level the Gradient Boosting prediction model has better prediction performance with mean absolute error (MAE) of 9 ug/m(3) and root mean square error (RMSE) of 10.25–16.76 ug/m(3), lower compared with the other three models, and based on season level four models have the best prediction performances in winter time and the worst in summer time. And more importantly the demonstration of models' different performances in each city and each season is of great significance in environmental policy implications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9519508 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95195082022-09-30 Time series-based PM(2.5) concentration prediction in Jing-Jin-Ji area using machine learning algorithm models Ma, Xin Chen, Tengfei Ge, Rubing Cui, Caocao Xu, Fan Lv, Qi Heliyon Research Article Globally all countries encounter air pollution problems along their development path. As a significant indicator of air quality, PM(2.5) concentration has long been proven to be affecting the population’s death rate. Machine learning algorithms proven to outperform traditional statistical approaches are widely used in air pollution prediction. However research on the model selection discussion and environmental interpretation of model prediction results is still scarce and urgently needed to lead the policy making on air pollution control. Our research compared four types of machine learning algorisms LinearSVR, K-Nearest Neighbor, Lasso regression, Gradient boosting by looking into their performance in predicting PM(2.5) concentrations among different cities and seasons. The results show that the machine learning model is able to forecast the next day PM(2.5) concentration based on the previous five days' data with better accuracy. The comparative experiments show that based on city level the Gradient Boosting prediction model has better prediction performance with mean absolute error (MAE) of 9 ug/m(3) and root mean square error (RMSE) of 10.25–16.76 ug/m(3), lower compared with the other three models, and based on season level four models have the best prediction performances in winter time and the worst in summer time. And more importantly the demonstration of models' different performances in each city and each season is of great significance in environmental policy implications. Elsevier 2022-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9519508/ /pubmed/36185154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10691 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ma, Xin Chen, Tengfei Ge, Rubing Cui, Caocao Xu, Fan Lv, Qi Time series-based PM(2.5) concentration prediction in Jing-Jin-Ji area using machine learning algorithm models |
title | Time series-based PM(2.5) concentration prediction in Jing-Jin-Ji area using machine learning algorithm models |
title_full | Time series-based PM(2.5) concentration prediction in Jing-Jin-Ji area using machine learning algorithm models |
title_fullStr | Time series-based PM(2.5) concentration prediction in Jing-Jin-Ji area using machine learning algorithm models |
title_full_unstemmed | Time series-based PM(2.5) concentration prediction in Jing-Jin-Ji area using machine learning algorithm models |
title_short | Time series-based PM(2.5) concentration prediction in Jing-Jin-Ji area using machine learning algorithm models |
title_sort | time series-based pm(2.5) concentration prediction in jing-jin-ji area using machine learning algorithm models |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9519508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36185154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10691 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maxin timeseriesbasedpm25concentrationpredictioninjingjinjiareausingmachinelearningalgorithmmodels AT chentengfei timeseriesbasedpm25concentrationpredictioninjingjinjiareausingmachinelearningalgorithmmodels AT gerubing timeseriesbasedpm25concentrationpredictioninjingjinjiareausingmachinelearningalgorithmmodels AT cuicaocao timeseriesbasedpm25concentrationpredictioninjingjinjiareausingmachinelearningalgorithmmodels AT xufan timeseriesbasedpm25concentrationpredictioninjingjinjiareausingmachinelearningalgorithmmodels AT lvqi timeseriesbasedpm25concentrationpredictioninjingjinjiareausingmachinelearningalgorithmmodels |