Cargando…

A critical evaluation of dynamical systems models of bipolar disorder

Bipolar disorder (BD) is a mood disorder involving recurring (hypo)manic and depressive episodes. The inherently temporal nature of BD has inspired its conceptualization using dynamical systems theory, which is a mathematical framework for understanding systems that evolve over time. In this paper,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nunes, Abraham, Singh, Selena, Allman, Jared, Becker, Suzanna, Ortiz, Abigail, Trappenberg, Thomas, Alda, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9519533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36171199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-022-02194-4
_version_ 1784799421106487296
author Nunes, Abraham
Singh, Selena
Allman, Jared
Becker, Suzanna
Ortiz, Abigail
Trappenberg, Thomas
Alda, Martin
author_facet Nunes, Abraham
Singh, Selena
Allman, Jared
Becker, Suzanna
Ortiz, Abigail
Trappenberg, Thomas
Alda, Martin
author_sort Nunes, Abraham
collection PubMed
description Bipolar disorder (BD) is a mood disorder involving recurring (hypo)manic and depressive episodes. The inherently temporal nature of BD has inspired its conceptualization using dynamical systems theory, which is a mathematical framework for understanding systems that evolve over time. In this paper, we provide a critical review of the dynamical systems models of BD. Owing to the heterogeneity of methodological and experimental designs in computational modeling, we designed a structured approach that parallels the appraisal of animal models by their face, predictive, and construct validity. This tool, the validity appraisal guide for computational models (VAG-CM), is not an absolute measure of validity, but rather a guide for a more objective appraisal of models in this review. We identified 26 studies published before November 18, 2021 that proposed generative dynamical systems models of time-varying signals in BD. Two raters independently applied the VAG-CM to the included studies, obtaining a mean Cohen’s κ of 0.55 (95% CI [0.45, 0.64]) prior to establishing consensus ratings. Consensus VAG-CM ratings revealed three model/study clusters: data-driven models with face validity, theory-driven models with predictive validity, and theory-driven models lacking all forms of validity. We conclude that future modeling studies should employ a hybrid approach that first operationalizes BD features of interest using empirical data to achieve face validity, followed by explanations of those features using generative models with components that are homologous to physiological or psychological systems involved in BD, to achieve construct validity. Such models would be best developed alongside long-term prospective cohort studies involving a collection of multimodal time-series data. We also encourage future studies to extend, modify, and evaluate the VAG-CM approach for a wider breadth of computational modeling studies and psychiatric disorders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9519533
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95195332022-09-30 A critical evaluation of dynamical systems models of bipolar disorder Nunes, Abraham Singh, Selena Allman, Jared Becker, Suzanna Ortiz, Abigail Trappenberg, Thomas Alda, Martin Transl Psychiatry Review Article Bipolar disorder (BD) is a mood disorder involving recurring (hypo)manic and depressive episodes. The inherently temporal nature of BD has inspired its conceptualization using dynamical systems theory, which is a mathematical framework for understanding systems that evolve over time. In this paper, we provide a critical review of the dynamical systems models of BD. Owing to the heterogeneity of methodological and experimental designs in computational modeling, we designed a structured approach that parallels the appraisal of animal models by their face, predictive, and construct validity. This tool, the validity appraisal guide for computational models (VAG-CM), is not an absolute measure of validity, but rather a guide for a more objective appraisal of models in this review. We identified 26 studies published before November 18, 2021 that proposed generative dynamical systems models of time-varying signals in BD. Two raters independently applied the VAG-CM to the included studies, obtaining a mean Cohen’s κ of 0.55 (95% CI [0.45, 0.64]) prior to establishing consensus ratings. Consensus VAG-CM ratings revealed three model/study clusters: data-driven models with face validity, theory-driven models with predictive validity, and theory-driven models lacking all forms of validity. We conclude that future modeling studies should employ a hybrid approach that first operationalizes BD features of interest using empirical data to achieve face validity, followed by explanations of those features using generative models with components that are homologous to physiological or psychological systems involved in BD, to achieve construct validity. Such models would be best developed alongside long-term prospective cohort studies involving a collection of multimodal time-series data. We also encourage future studies to extend, modify, and evaluate the VAG-CM approach for a wider breadth of computational modeling studies and psychiatric disorders. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9519533/ /pubmed/36171199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-022-02194-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Nunes, Abraham
Singh, Selena
Allman, Jared
Becker, Suzanna
Ortiz, Abigail
Trappenberg, Thomas
Alda, Martin
A critical evaluation of dynamical systems models of bipolar disorder
title A critical evaluation of dynamical systems models of bipolar disorder
title_full A critical evaluation of dynamical systems models of bipolar disorder
title_fullStr A critical evaluation of dynamical systems models of bipolar disorder
title_full_unstemmed A critical evaluation of dynamical systems models of bipolar disorder
title_short A critical evaluation of dynamical systems models of bipolar disorder
title_sort critical evaluation of dynamical systems models of bipolar disorder
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9519533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36171199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-022-02194-4
work_keys_str_mv AT nunesabraham acriticalevaluationofdynamicalsystemsmodelsofbipolardisorder
AT singhselena acriticalevaluationofdynamicalsystemsmodelsofbipolardisorder
AT allmanjared acriticalevaluationofdynamicalsystemsmodelsofbipolardisorder
AT beckersuzanna acriticalevaluationofdynamicalsystemsmodelsofbipolardisorder
AT ortizabigail acriticalevaluationofdynamicalsystemsmodelsofbipolardisorder
AT trappenbergthomas acriticalevaluationofdynamicalsystemsmodelsofbipolardisorder
AT aldamartin acriticalevaluationofdynamicalsystemsmodelsofbipolardisorder
AT nunesabraham criticalevaluationofdynamicalsystemsmodelsofbipolardisorder
AT singhselena criticalevaluationofdynamicalsystemsmodelsofbipolardisorder
AT allmanjared criticalevaluationofdynamicalsystemsmodelsofbipolardisorder
AT beckersuzanna criticalevaluationofdynamicalsystemsmodelsofbipolardisorder
AT ortizabigail criticalevaluationofdynamicalsystemsmodelsofbipolardisorder
AT trappenbergthomas criticalevaluationofdynamicalsystemsmodelsofbipolardisorder
AT aldamartin criticalevaluationofdynamicalsystemsmodelsofbipolardisorder