Cargando…
Prospective analysis of breast masses using the combined score for quantitative ultrasonography parameters
To investigate the diagnostic value of combined SWE, SMI, and B-mode US scores for distinguishing between benign and malignant masses. A total of 450 breast masses that underwent US-guided core needle biopsies were prospectively enrolled. The breast masses were assessed based on the BI-RADS and quan...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9519555/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36171328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19971-2 |
_version_ | 1784799426454224896 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Eun Ji Chang, Yun-Woo |
author_facet | Lee, Eun Ji Chang, Yun-Woo |
author_sort | Lee, Eun Ji |
collection | PubMed |
description | To investigate the diagnostic value of combined SWE, SMI, and B-mode US scores for distinguishing between benign and malignant masses. A total of 450 breast masses that underwent US-guided core needle biopsies were prospectively enrolled. The breast masses were assessed based on the BI-RADS and quantitative SWE and SMI parameters. The SWEmax, SWEratio, and SMI(VI) cutoff value were determined using Youden’s index by comparison to the pathological results. The BI-RADS categories were scored on a scale from 1 to 5, and SWEmax, SWEratio, and SMI(VI) were dichotomized based on each cutoff values (0 or 1). The combined scores (1 to 8) were calculated as the sum of the BI-RADS score and the quantitative scores and compared to the pathologic results using AUROC analysis. The cutoff values were 52.25 kPa for SWEmax, 5.03 for SWEratio, and 2.15% for SMI(VI). In AUROC, the combined scores showed significantly better diagnostic performance compared to BI-RADS alone (p < 0.001). The combined score showed significantly increased than BI-RADS alone in specificity (p < 0.001) and accuracy (p < 0.001), but a sensitivity decreased without significance (p = 0.082). When a combined score cutoff value of 4 was used, the false negative rate was 2.7%. Using the combined score, 76.4% of the C4a lesions were considered benign also pathologically diagnosed as benign. The combined scores showed improved diagnostic performance in differentiating between benign and malignant breast masses, which could be helpful for determining a breast biopsy eligibility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9519555 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95195552022-09-30 Prospective analysis of breast masses using the combined score for quantitative ultrasonography parameters Lee, Eun Ji Chang, Yun-Woo Sci Rep Article To investigate the diagnostic value of combined SWE, SMI, and B-mode US scores for distinguishing between benign and malignant masses. A total of 450 breast masses that underwent US-guided core needle biopsies were prospectively enrolled. The breast masses were assessed based on the BI-RADS and quantitative SWE and SMI parameters. The SWEmax, SWEratio, and SMI(VI) cutoff value were determined using Youden’s index by comparison to the pathological results. The BI-RADS categories were scored on a scale from 1 to 5, and SWEmax, SWEratio, and SMI(VI) were dichotomized based on each cutoff values (0 or 1). The combined scores (1 to 8) were calculated as the sum of the BI-RADS score and the quantitative scores and compared to the pathologic results using AUROC analysis. The cutoff values were 52.25 kPa for SWEmax, 5.03 for SWEratio, and 2.15% for SMI(VI). In AUROC, the combined scores showed significantly better diagnostic performance compared to BI-RADS alone (p < 0.001). The combined score showed significantly increased than BI-RADS alone in specificity (p < 0.001) and accuracy (p < 0.001), but a sensitivity decreased without significance (p = 0.082). When a combined score cutoff value of 4 was used, the false negative rate was 2.7%. Using the combined score, 76.4% of the C4a lesions were considered benign also pathologically diagnosed as benign. The combined scores showed improved diagnostic performance in differentiating between benign and malignant breast masses, which could be helpful for determining a breast biopsy eligibility. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9519555/ /pubmed/36171328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19971-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Lee, Eun Ji Chang, Yun-Woo Prospective analysis of breast masses using the combined score for quantitative ultrasonography parameters |
title | Prospective analysis of breast masses using the combined score for quantitative ultrasonography parameters |
title_full | Prospective analysis of breast masses using the combined score for quantitative ultrasonography parameters |
title_fullStr | Prospective analysis of breast masses using the combined score for quantitative ultrasonography parameters |
title_full_unstemmed | Prospective analysis of breast masses using the combined score for quantitative ultrasonography parameters |
title_short | Prospective analysis of breast masses using the combined score for quantitative ultrasonography parameters |
title_sort | prospective analysis of breast masses using the combined score for quantitative ultrasonography parameters |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9519555/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36171328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19971-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leeeunji prospectiveanalysisofbreastmassesusingthecombinedscoreforquantitativeultrasonographyparameters AT changyunwoo prospectiveanalysisofbreastmassesusingthecombinedscoreforquantitativeultrasonographyparameters |