Cargando…

Long-term effects on the quality of life following cochlear implant treatment in older patients

PURPOSE: Even in older patients, hearing rehabilitation with a cochlear implant has become an established method for deafened or severely hearing-impaired patients. In addition to the hearing improvement, numerous other effects of CI treatment can be observed in clinical routine. In the literature,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Issing, Christian, Holtz, Svea, Loth, Andreas G., Baumann, Uwe, Pantel, Johannes, Stöver, Timo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9519647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35366712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07354-2
_version_ 1784799446671818752
author Issing, Christian
Holtz, Svea
Loth, Andreas G.
Baumann, Uwe
Pantel, Johannes
Stöver, Timo
author_facet Issing, Christian
Holtz, Svea
Loth, Andreas G.
Baumann, Uwe
Pantel, Johannes
Stöver, Timo
author_sort Issing, Christian
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Even in older patients, hearing rehabilitation with a cochlear implant has become an established method for deafened or severely hearing-impaired patients. In addition to the hearing improvement, numerous other effects of CI treatment can be observed in clinical routine. In the literature, there is multiple evidence for a rapid and significant improvement in quality of life with CI treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of hearing rehabilitation using CI on the quality of life in older patients (≥ 65 years). METHODS: This prospective cross-sectional study examined 84 patients between the age of 65 and 101 years who received unilateral CI treatment for the first time between one and 10 years ago. The World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale-Old (WHOQL-OLD) was used to determine the quality of life. The study cohort was divided into three groups to compare the quality of life over time: group I (1–3 years after CI treatment), group II (4–6 years after CI treatment), and group III (7–10 years after CI treatment). In addition, the data from this study were compared with the results of our previous study (Issing et al. 2020) in which we focused on the first 6 months after CI treatment. RESULTS: In all three groups, there was a significant improvement in monosyllabic discrimination within 1 year after CI fitting (p > 0.001). No significant differences were found between the three groups. There were no significant differences between the three groups in the WHOQOL-OLD total score (p = 0.487) or any of the other six facets. Moreover, no significant differences were found compared to the study group of our previous study 6 months after CI treatment. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the long-term stability of the improved quality of life following unilateral CI treatment in patients aged 65 years or older.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9519647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95196472022-09-30 Long-term effects on the quality of life following cochlear implant treatment in older patients Issing, Christian Holtz, Svea Loth, Andreas G. Baumann, Uwe Pantel, Johannes Stöver, Timo Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Otology PURPOSE: Even in older patients, hearing rehabilitation with a cochlear implant has become an established method for deafened or severely hearing-impaired patients. In addition to the hearing improvement, numerous other effects of CI treatment can be observed in clinical routine. In the literature, there is multiple evidence for a rapid and significant improvement in quality of life with CI treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of hearing rehabilitation using CI on the quality of life in older patients (≥ 65 years). METHODS: This prospective cross-sectional study examined 84 patients between the age of 65 and 101 years who received unilateral CI treatment for the first time between one and 10 years ago. The World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale-Old (WHOQL-OLD) was used to determine the quality of life. The study cohort was divided into three groups to compare the quality of life over time: group I (1–3 years after CI treatment), group II (4–6 years after CI treatment), and group III (7–10 years after CI treatment). In addition, the data from this study were compared with the results of our previous study (Issing et al. 2020) in which we focused on the first 6 months after CI treatment. RESULTS: In all three groups, there was a significant improvement in monosyllabic discrimination within 1 year after CI fitting (p > 0.001). No significant differences were found between the three groups. There were no significant differences between the three groups in the WHOQOL-OLD total score (p = 0.487) or any of the other six facets. Moreover, no significant differences were found compared to the study group of our previous study 6 months after CI treatment. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the long-term stability of the improved quality of life following unilateral CI treatment in patients aged 65 years or older. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-04-02 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9519647/ /pubmed/35366712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07354-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Otology
Issing, Christian
Holtz, Svea
Loth, Andreas G.
Baumann, Uwe
Pantel, Johannes
Stöver, Timo
Long-term effects on the quality of life following cochlear implant treatment in older patients
title Long-term effects on the quality of life following cochlear implant treatment in older patients
title_full Long-term effects on the quality of life following cochlear implant treatment in older patients
title_fullStr Long-term effects on the quality of life following cochlear implant treatment in older patients
title_full_unstemmed Long-term effects on the quality of life following cochlear implant treatment in older patients
title_short Long-term effects on the quality of life following cochlear implant treatment in older patients
title_sort long-term effects on the quality of life following cochlear implant treatment in older patients
topic Otology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9519647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35366712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07354-2
work_keys_str_mv AT issingchristian longtermeffectsonthequalityoflifefollowingcochlearimplanttreatmentinolderpatients
AT holtzsvea longtermeffectsonthequalityoflifefollowingcochlearimplanttreatmentinolderpatients
AT lothandreasg longtermeffectsonthequalityoflifefollowingcochlearimplanttreatmentinolderpatients
AT baumannuwe longtermeffectsonthequalityoflifefollowingcochlearimplanttreatmentinolderpatients
AT panteljohannes longtermeffectsonthequalityoflifefollowingcochlearimplanttreatmentinolderpatients
AT stovertimo longtermeffectsonthequalityoflifefollowingcochlearimplanttreatmentinolderpatients