Cargando…

There is no dose–response relationship between the amount of exercise and improvement in HbA1c in interventions over 12 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis and meta-regression

AIMS: Aerobic exercise is well recognised as an effective treatment for people with type 2 diabetes but the optimal amount of aerobic exercise to improve glycaemic control remains to be determined. Thus, the aim of this meta-analysis and meta-regression was to assess the impact of volume and intensi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wrench, Elizabeth, Rattley, Kate, Lambert, Joel E., Killick, Rebecca, Hayes, Lawrence D., Lauder, Robert M., Gaffney, Christopher J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9519659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35930075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00592-022-01918-8
_version_ 1784799449265995776
author Wrench, Elizabeth
Rattley, Kate
Lambert, Joel E.
Killick, Rebecca
Hayes, Lawrence D.
Lauder, Robert M.
Gaffney, Christopher J.
author_facet Wrench, Elizabeth
Rattley, Kate
Lambert, Joel E.
Killick, Rebecca
Hayes, Lawrence D.
Lauder, Robert M.
Gaffney, Christopher J.
author_sort Wrench, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Aerobic exercise is well recognised as an effective treatment for people with type 2 diabetes but the optimal amount of aerobic exercise to improve glycaemic control remains to be determined. Thus, the aim of this meta-analysis and meta-regression was to assess the impact of volume and intensity of aerobic exercise on glycaemic control. METHODS: Medline, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched up until 15 December 2020 for the terms “aerobic exercise AND glycaemic control”, “type 2 diabetes AND exercise”, and “exercise AND glycaemic control AND Type 2 diabetes AND randomised control trial”. We included (i) randomised control trials of ≥ 12 weeks, (ii) trials where participants had type 2 diabetes and were aged 18 or over, and (iii) the trial reported HbA1c concentrations pre- and post-intervention. Two reviewers selected studies and extracted data. Data are reported as standardised mean difference (SMD) and publication bias was assessed using funnel plots. RESULTS: A total of 5364 original titles were identified. Sixteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Aerobic exercise reduced HbA1c versus control (SMD = 0.56 (95% CI 0.3–0.82), p < 0.001). There were also significant reductions in BMI (SMD = 0.76 (95% CI 0.25–1.27), p < 0.05). There was no dose–response relationship between improvement in HbA1c and the intensity and volume of the intervention (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Twelve-week or longer aerobic exercise programmes improve glycaemic control and BMI in adults with type 2 diabetes. Longer or more intense interventions appear to confer no additional benefit on HbA1c. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00592-022-01918-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9519659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95196592022-09-30 There is no dose–response relationship between the amount of exercise and improvement in HbA1c in interventions over 12 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis and meta-regression Wrench, Elizabeth Rattley, Kate Lambert, Joel E. Killick, Rebecca Hayes, Lawrence D. Lauder, Robert M. Gaffney, Christopher J. Acta Diabetol Review Article AIMS: Aerobic exercise is well recognised as an effective treatment for people with type 2 diabetes but the optimal amount of aerobic exercise to improve glycaemic control remains to be determined. Thus, the aim of this meta-analysis and meta-regression was to assess the impact of volume and intensity of aerobic exercise on glycaemic control. METHODS: Medline, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched up until 15 December 2020 for the terms “aerobic exercise AND glycaemic control”, “type 2 diabetes AND exercise”, and “exercise AND glycaemic control AND Type 2 diabetes AND randomised control trial”. We included (i) randomised control trials of ≥ 12 weeks, (ii) trials where participants had type 2 diabetes and were aged 18 or over, and (iii) the trial reported HbA1c concentrations pre- and post-intervention. Two reviewers selected studies and extracted data. Data are reported as standardised mean difference (SMD) and publication bias was assessed using funnel plots. RESULTS: A total of 5364 original titles were identified. Sixteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Aerobic exercise reduced HbA1c versus control (SMD = 0.56 (95% CI 0.3–0.82), p < 0.001). There were also significant reductions in BMI (SMD = 0.76 (95% CI 0.25–1.27), p < 0.05). There was no dose–response relationship between improvement in HbA1c and the intensity and volume of the intervention (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Twelve-week or longer aerobic exercise programmes improve glycaemic control and BMI in adults with type 2 diabetes. Longer or more intense interventions appear to confer no additional benefit on HbA1c. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00592-022-01918-8. Springer Milan 2022-08-05 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9519659/ /pubmed/35930075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00592-022-01918-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Wrench, Elizabeth
Rattley, Kate
Lambert, Joel E.
Killick, Rebecca
Hayes, Lawrence D.
Lauder, Robert M.
Gaffney, Christopher J.
There is no dose–response relationship between the amount of exercise and improvement in HbA1c in interventions over 12 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis and meta-regression
title There is no dose–response relationship between the amount of exercise and improvement in HbA1c in interventions over 12 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis and meta-regression
title_full There is no dose–response relationship between the amount of exercise and improvement in HbA1c in interventions over 12 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis and meta-regression
title_fullStr There is no dose–response relationship between the amount of exercise and improvement in HbA1c in interventions over 12 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis and meta-regression
title_full_unstemmed There is no dose–response relationship between the amount of exercise and improvement in HbA1c in interventions over 12 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis and meta-regression
title_short There is no dose–response relationship between the amount of exercise and improvement in HbA1c in interventions over 12 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis and meta-regression
title_sort there is no dose–response relationship between the amount of exercise and improvement in hba1c in interventions over 12 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis and meta-regression
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9519659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35930075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00592-022-01918-8
work_keys_str_mv AT wrenchelizabeth thereisnodoseresponserelationshipbetweentheamountofexerciseandimprovementinhba1cininterventionsover12weeksinpatientswithtype2diabetesametaanalysisandmetaregression
AT rattleykate thereisnodoseresponserelationshipbetweentheamountofexerciseandimprovementinhba1cininterventionsover12weeksinpatientswithtype2diabetesametaanalysisandmetaregression
AT lambertjoele thereisnodoseresponserelationshipbetweentheamountofexerciseandimprovementinhba1cininterventionsover12weeksinpatientswithtype2diabetesametaanalysisandmetaregression
AT killickrebecca thereisnodoseresponserelationshipbetweentheamountofexerciseandimprovementinhba1cininterventionsover12weeksinpatientswithtype2diabetesametaanalysisandmetaregression
AT hayeslawrenced thereisnodoseresponserelationshipbetweentheamountofexerciseandimprovementinhba1cininterventionsover12weeksinpatientswithtype2diabetesametaanalysisandmetaregression
AT lauderrobertm thereisnodoseresponserelationshipbetweentheamountofexerciseandimprovementinhba1cininterventionsover12weeksinpatientswithtype2diabetesametaanalysisandmetaregression
AT gaffneychristopherj thereisnodoseresponserelationshipbetweentheamountofexerciseandimprovementinhba1cininterventionsover12weeksinpatientswithtype2diabetesametaanalysisandmetaregression