Informed consent for suspension microlaryngoscopy: what should we tell the patient? A consensus statement of the European Laryngological Society

INTRODUCTION: Informed consent for any surgical intervention is necessary, as only well-informed patients can actively participate in the decision-making process about their care, and better understand the likely or potential outcomes of their treatment. No consensus exists on informed consent for s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dikkers, Frederik G., San Giorgi, Michel R. M., Rinkel, Rico N. P. M., Remacle, Marc, Giovanni, Antoine, Wierzbicka, Małgorzata, Seedat, Riaz, Campos, Guillermo, Sandhu, Guri S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Laryngology
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9519673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35821269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07429-0
_version_ 1784799452321546240
author Dikkers, Frederik G.
San Giorgi, Michel R. M.
Rinkel, Rico N. P. M.
Remacle, Marc
Giovanni, Antoine
Wierzbicka, Małgorzata
Seedat, Riaz
Campos, Guillermo
Sandhu, Guri S.
author_facet Dikkers, Frederik G.
San Giorgi, Michel R. M.
Rinkel, Rico N. P. M.
Remacle, Marc
Giovanni, Antoine
Wierzbicka, Małgorzata
Seedat, Riaz
Campos, Guillermo
Sandhu, Guri S.
author_sort Dikkers, Frederik G.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Informed consent for any surgical intervention is necessary, as only well-informed patients can actively participate in the decision-making process about their care, and better understand the likely or potential outcomes of their treatment. No consensus exists on informed consent for suspension microlaryngoscopy (SML). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Informed consent procedures in nine countries on five continents were studied. RESULTS: Several risks can be discerned: risks of SML as procedure, anesthesiologic risks of SML, specific risks of phonosurgery, risks of inadequate glottic exposure or unexpected findings, risks of not treating. SML has recognized potential complications, that can be divided in temporary (minor) complications, and lasting (major) complications. CONCLUSION: SML is a safe procedure with low morbidity, and virtually no mortality. Eleven recommendations are provided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9519673
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95196732022-09-30 Informed consent for suspension microlaryngoscopy: what should we tell the patient? A consensus statement of the European Laryngological Society Dikkers, Frederik G. San Giorgi, Michel R. M. Rinkel, Rico N. P. M. Remacle, Marc Giovanni, Antoine Wierzbicka, Małgorzata Seedat, Riaz Campos, Guillermo Sandhu, Guri S. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Laryngology INTRODUCTION: Informed consent for any surgical intervention is necessary, as only well-informed patients can actively participate in the decision-making process about their care, and better understand the likely or potential outcomes of their treatment. No consensus exists on informed consent for suspension microlaryngoscopy (SML). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Informed consent procedures in nine countries on five continents were studied. RESULTS: Several risks can be discerned: risks of SML as procedure, anesthesiologic risks of SML, specific risks of phonosurgery, risks of inadequate glottic exposure or unexpected findings, risks of not treating. SML has recognized potential complications, that can be divided in temporary (minor) complications, and lasting (major) complications. CONCLUSION: SML is a safe procedure with low morbidity, and virtually no mortality. Eleven recommendations are provided. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-07-12 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9519673/ /pubmed/35821269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07429-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Laryngology
Dikkers, Frederik G.
San Giorgi, Michel R. M.
Rinkel, Rico N. P. M.
Remacle, Marc
Giovanni, Antoine
Wierzbicka, Małgorzata
Seedat, Riaz
Campos, Guillermo
Sandhu, Guri S.
Informed consent for suspension microlaryngoscopy: what should we tell the patient? A consensus statement of the European Laryngological Society
title Informed consent for suspension microlaryngoscopy: what should we tell the patient? A consensus statement of the European Laryngological Society
title_full Informed consent for suspension microlaryngoscopy: what should we tell the patient? A consensus statement of the European Laryngological Society
title_fullStr Informed consent for suspension microlaryngoscopy: what should we tell the patient? A consensus statement of the European Laryngological Society
title_full_unstemmed Informed consent for suspension microlaryngoscopy: what should we tell the patient? A consensus statement of the European Laryngological Society
title_short Informed consent for suspension microlaryngoscopy: what should we tell the patient? A consensus statement of the European Laryngological Society
title_sort informed consent for suspension microlaryngoscopy: what should we tell the patient? a consensus statement of the european laryngological society
topic Laryngology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9519673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35821269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07429-0
work_keys_str_mv AT dikkersfrederikg informedconsentforsuspensionmicrolaryngoscopywhatshouldwetellthepatientaconsensusstatementoftheeuropeanlaryngologicalsociety
AT sangiorgimichelrm informedconsentforsuspensionmicrolaryngoscopywhatshouldwetellthepatientaconsensusstatementoftheeuropeanlaryngologicalsociety
AT rinkelriconpm informedconsentforsuspensionmicrolaryngoscopywhatshouldwetellthepatientaconsensusstatementoftheeuropeanlaryngologicalsociety
AT remaclemarc informedconsentforsuspensionmicrolaryngoscopywhatshouldwetellthepatientaconsensusstatementoftheeuropeanlaryngologicalsociety
AT giovanniantoine informedconsentforsuspensionmicrolaryngoscopywhatshouldwetellthepatientaconsensusstatementoftheeuropeanlaryngologicalsociety
AT wierzbickamałgorzata informedconsentforsuspensionmicrolaryngoscopywhatshouldwetellthepatientaconsensusstatementoftheeuropeanlaryngologicalsociety
AT seedatriaz informedconsentforsuspensionmicrolaryngoscopywhatshouldwetellthepatientaconsensusstatementoftheeuropeanlaryngologicalsociety
AT camposguillermo informedconsentforsuspensionmicrolaryngoscopywhatshouldwetellthepatientaconsensusstatementoftheeuropeanlaryngologicalsociety
AT sandhuguris informedconsentforsuspensionmicrolaryngoscopywhatshouldwetellthepatientaconsensusstatementoftheeuropeanlaryngologicalsociety

Ejemplares similares