Cargando…
Potential of blood-based biomarker approaches in endometrium and breast cancer: a case-control comparison study
PURPOSE: Endometrial carcinoma is the second most common gynecological malignancy. Until today lacking a screening tool. A blood-based biomarker could help address this need. METHODS: The expression levels of 30 acylcarnitines, 18 amino acids, 6 miRNAs, and 7 DNA methylation sites were measured in b...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9519681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35284957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06482-8 |
_version_ | 1784799454459592704 |
---|---|
author | Schuhn, Anne Tobar, Tania Witte Gahlawat, Aoife Ward Hauke, Jana Baumann, Lukas Okun, Jürgen G. Nees, Juliane |
author_facet | Schuhn, Anne Tobar, Tania Witte Gahlawat, Aoife Ward Hauke, Jana Baumann, Lukas Okun, Jürgen G. Nees, Juliane |
author_sort | Schuhn, Anne |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Endometrial carcinoma is the second most common gynecological malignancy. Until today lacking a screening tool. A blood-based biomarker could help address this need. METHODS: The expression levels of 30 acylcarnitines, 18 amino acids, 6 miRNAs, and 7 DNA methylation sites were measured in blood samples from 331 women (20 EC, 14 benign uterine lesions (benign), 140 breast cancers (BC), 157 controls). Areas under the ROC curves (AUC), sensitivity (sens.) and specificity (spec.) were computed to identify the variables best distinguishing. RESULTS: The best top ten markers for the four comparisons (cancer vs. cancer-free; EC vs. BC, EC vs. controls; EC vs. benign), were identified via AUC. Malonylcarnitine distinguished best patients with EC from controls (AUC: 0.827, sens. 80%, spec. 73.1%) or BC (AUC: 0.819, sens. 84.3%, spec. 80%) being most notable. Tryptophan best differentiated benign from EC (AUC: 0.846, sens. 70%, spec. 92.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The levels of the analyzed blood markers yielded promising results in the detection of EC and warrant further evaluation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00404-022-06482-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9519681 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95196812022-09-30 Potential of blood-based biomarker approaches in endometrium and breast cancer: a case-control comparison study Schuhn, Anne Tobar, Tania Witte Gahlawat, Aoife Ward Hauke, Jana Baumann, Lukas Okun, Jürgen G. Nees, Juliane Arch Gynecol Obstet Gynecologic Oncology PURPOSE: Endometrial carcinoma is the second most common gynecological malignancy. Until today lacking a screening tool. A blood-based biomarker could help address this need. METHODS: The expression levels of 30 acylcarnitines, 18 amino acids, 6 miRNAs, and 7 DNA methylation sites were measured in blood samples from 331 women (20 EC, 14 benign uterine lesions (benign), 140 breast cancers (BC), 157 controls). Areas under the ROC curves (AUC), sensitivity (sens.) and specificity (spec.) were computed to identify the variables best distinguishing. RESULTS: The best top ten markers for the four comparisons (cancer vs. cancer-free; EC vs. BC, EC vs. controls; EC vs. benign), were identified via AUC. Malonylcarnitine distinguished best patients with EC from controls (AUC: 0.827, sens. 80%, spec. 73.1%) or BC (AUC: 0.819, sens. 84.3%, spec. 80%) being most notable. Tryptophan best differentiated benign from EC (AUC: 0.846, sens. 70%, spec. 92.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The levels of the analyzed blood markers yielded promising results in the detection of EC and warrant further evaluation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00404-022-06482-8. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-03-13 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9519681/ /pubmed/35284957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06482-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Gynecologic Oncology Schuhn, Anne Tobar, Tania Witte Gahlawat, Aoife Ward Hauke, Jana Baumann, Lukas Okun, Jürgen G. Nees, Juliane Potential of blood-based biomarker approaches in endometrium and breast cancer: a case-control comparison study |
title | Potential of blood-based biomarker approaches in endometrium and breast cancer: a case-control comparison study |
title_full | Potential of blood-based biomarker approaches in endometrium and breast cancer: a case-control comparison study |
title_fullStr | Potential of blood-based biomarker approaches in endometrium and breast cancer: a case-control comparison study |
title_full_unstemmed | Potential of blood-based biomarker approaches in endometrium and breast cancer: a case-control comparison study |
title_short | Potential of blood-based biomarker approaches in endometrium and breast cancer: a case-control comparison study |
title_sort | potential of blood-based biomarker approaches in endometrium and breast cancer: a case-control comparison study |
topic | Gynecologic Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9519681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35284957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06482-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schuhnanne potentialofbloodbasedbiomarkerapproachesinendometriumandbreastcanceracasecontrolcomparisonstudy AT tobartaniawitte potentialofbloodbasedbiomarkerapproachesinendometriumandbreastcanceracasecontrolcomparisonstudy AT gahlawataoifeward potentialofbloodbasedbiomarkerapproachesinendometriumandbreastcanceracasecontrolcomparisonstudy AT haukejana potentialofbloodbasedbiomarkerapproachesinendometriumandbreastcanceracasecontrolcomparisonstudy AT baumannlukas potentialofbloodbasedbiomarkerapproachesinendometriumandbreastcanceracasecontrolcomparisonstudy AT okunjurgeng potentialofbloodbasedbiomarkerapproachesinendometriumandbreastcanceracasecontrolcomparisonstudy AT neesjuliane potentialofbloodbasedbiomarkerapproachesinendometriumandbreastcanceracasecontrolcomparisonstudy |