Cargando…

Potential of blood-based biomarker approaches in endometrium and breast cancer: a case-control comparison study

PURPOSE: Endometrial carcinoma is the second most common gynecological malignancy. Until today lacking a screening tool. A blood-based biomarker could help address this need. METHODS: The expression levels of 30 acylcarnitines, 18 amino acids, 6 miRNAs, and 7 DNA methylation sites were measured in b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schuhn, Anne, Tobar, Tania Witte, Gahlawat, Aoife Ward, Hauke, Jana, Baumann, Lukas, Okun, Jürgen G., Nees, Juliane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9519681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35284957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06482-8
_version_ 1784799454459592704
author Schuhn, Anne
Tobar, Tania Witte
Gahlawat, Aoife Ward
Hauke, Jana
Baumann, Lukas
Okun, Jürgen G.
Nees, Juliane
author_facet Schuhn, Anne
Tobar, Tania Witte
Gahlawat, Aoife Ward
Hauke, Jana
Baumann, Lukas
Okun, Jürgen G.
Nees, Juliane
author_sort Schuhn, Anne
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Endometrial carcinoma is the second most common gynecological malignancy. Until today lacking a screening tool. A blood-based biomarker could help address this need. METHODS: The expression levels of 30 acylcarnitines, 18 amino acids, 6 miRNAs, and 7 DNA methylation sites were measured in blood samples from 331 women (20 EC, 14 benign uterine lesions (benign), 140 breast cancers (BC), 157 controls). Areas under the ROC curves (AUC), sensitivity (sens.) and specificity (spec.) were computed to identify the variables best distinguishing. RESULTS: The best top ten markers for the four comparisons (cancer vs. cancer-free; EC vs. BC, EC vs. controls; EC vs. benign), were identified via AUC. Malonylcarnitine distinguished best patients with EC from controls (AUC: 0.827, sens. 80%, spec. 73.1%) or BC (AUC: 0.819, sens. 84.3%, spec. 80%) being most notable. Tryptophan best differentiated benign from EC (AUC: 0.846, sens. 70%, spec. 92.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The levels of the analyzed blood markers yielded promising results in the detection of EC and warrant further evaluation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00404-022-06482-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9519681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95196812022-09-30 Potential of blood-based biomarker approaches in endometrium and breast cancer: a case-control comparison study Schuhn, Anne Tobar, Tania Witte Gahlawat, Aoife Ward Hauke, Jana Baumann, Lukas Okun, Jürgen G. Nees, Juliane Arch Gynecol Obstet Gynecologic Oncology PURPOSE: Endometrial carcinoma is the second most common gynecological malignancy. Until today lacking a screening tool. A blood-based biomarker could help address this need. METHODS: The expression levels of 30 acylcarnitines, 18 amino acids, 6 miRNAs, and 7 DNA methylation sites were measured in blood samples from 331 women (20 EC, 14 benign uterine lesions (benign), 140 breast cancers (BC), 157 controls). Areas under the ROC curves (AUC), sensitivity (sens.) and specificity (spec.) were computed to identify the variables best distinguishing. RESULTS: The best top ten markers for the four comparisons (cancer vs. cancer-free; EC vs. BC, EC vs. controls; EC vs. benign), were identified via AUC. Malonylcarnitine distinguished best patients with EC from controls (AUC: 0.827, sens. 80%, spec. 73.1%) or BC (AUC: 0.819, sens. 84.3%, spec. 80%) being most notable. Tryptophan best differentiated benign from EC (AUC: 0.846, sens. 70%, spec. 92.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The levels of the analyzed blood markers yielded promising results in the detection of EC and warrant further evaluation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00404-022-06482-8. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-03-13 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9519681/ /pubmed/35284957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06482-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Gynecologic Oncology
Schuhn, Anne
Tobar, Tania Witte
Gahlawat, Aoife Ward
Hauke, Jana
Baumann, Lukas
Okun, Jürgen G.
Nees, Juliane
Potential of blood-based biomarker approaches in endometrium and breast cancer: a case-control comparison study
title Potential of blood-based biomarker approaches in endometrium and breast cancer: a case-control comparison study
title_full Potential of blood-based biomarker approaches in endometrium and breast cancer: a case-control comparison study
title_fullStr Potential of blood-based biomarker approaches in endometrium and breast cancer: a case-control comparison study
title_full_unstemmed Potential of blood-based biomarker approaches in endometrium and breast cancer: a case-control comparison study
title_short Potential of blood-based biomarker approaches in endometrium and breast cancer: a case-control comparison study
title_sort potential of blood-based biomarker approaches in endometrium and breast cancer: a case-control comparison study
topic Gynecologic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9519681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35284957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06482-8
work_keys_str_mv AT schuhnanne potentialofbloodbasedbiomarkerapproachesinendometriumandbreastcanceracasecontrolcomparisonstudy
AT tobartaniawitte potentialofbloodbasedbiomarkerapproachesinendometriumandbreastcanceracasecontrolcomparisonstudy
AT gahlawataoifeward potentialofbloodbasedbiomarkerapproachesinendometriumandbreastcanceracasecontrolcomparisonstudy
AT haukejana potentialofbloodbasedbiomarkerapproachesinendometriumandbreastcanceracasecontrolcomparisonstudy
AT baumannlukas potentialofbloodbasedbiomarkerapproachesinendometriumandbreastcanceracasecontrolcomparisonstudy
AT okunjurgeng potentialofbloodbasedbiomarkerapproachesinendometriumandbreastcanceracasecontrolcomparisonstudy
AT neesjuliane potentialofbloodbasedbiomarkerapproachesinendometriumandbreastcanceracasecontrolcomparisonstudy