Cargando…
A retrospective analysis of hearing after cholesteatoma surgery: the bony obliteration tympanoplasty versus canal wall up and canal wall down without mastoid obliteration
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the hearing outcome after the bony obliteration tympanoplasty (BOT), canal wall up (CWU) without mastoid obliteration and canal wall down (CWD) without mastoid obliteration in a large patient cohort. As the aeration of the middle ear is associated with hearing outc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9519705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35399107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07367-x |
_version_ | 1784799459603906560 |
---|---|
author | van der Toom, Hylke F. E. van der Schroeff, Marc P. Metselaar, Mick van Linge, Anne Vroegop, Jantien L. Pauw, Robert J. |
author_facet | van der Toom, Hylke F. E. van der Schroeff, Marc P. Metselaar, Mick van Linge, Anne Vroegop, Jantien L. Pauw, Robert J. |
author_sort | van der Toom, Hylke F. E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the hearing outcome after the bony obliteration tympanoplasty (BOT), canal wall up (CWU) without mastoid obliteration and canal wall down (CWD) without mastoid obliteration in a large patient cohort. As the aeration of the middle ear is associated with hearing outcome, we hypothesized that the post-operative hearing after the BOT may be better compared to CWU and CWD without obliteration. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study on all adult patients who underwent the BOT, CWU without obliteration or CWD without obliteration for primary or revision cholesteatoma between January 2003 and March 2019 with audiological follow-up at our institution. Pre-operative, short-term post-operative and long-term post-operative hearing tests were analyzed and potential factors influencing post-operative hearing were assessed. RESULTS: 626 ears were included. We found no significant differences between the short-term and long-term post-operative audiometry. The pre-operative air–bone gap (ABG) was the factor with the largest effect size on change in air–bone gap (ABG) between pre- and post-operative. When stratifying for this factor along with the type of ossicular chain reconstruction to account for differences at baseline, no significant differences in post-operative ABG were found between BOT and non-obliteration CWU and CWD. CONCLUSION: In this large retrospective cohort study, we found no significant differences in post-operative ABG between the BOT and the non-obliteration CWU and CWD. A solid comparison of hearing between groups remains very challenging as hearing outcome seems to be dependent on many different factors. Hearing outcome seems to be no additional argument to choose for BOT over non-obliteration surgery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00405-022-07367-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9519705 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95197052022-09-30 A retrospective analysis of hearing after cholesteatoma surgery: the bony obliteration tympanoplasty versus canal wall up and canal wall down without mastoid obliteration van der Toom, Hylke F. E. van der Schroeff, Marc P. Metselaar, Mick van Linge, Anne Vroegop, Jantien L. Pauw, Robert J. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Otology OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the hearing outcome after the bony obliteration tympanoplasty (BOT), canal wall up (CWU) without mastoid obliteration and canal wall down (CWD) without mastoid obliteration in a large patient cohort. As the aeration of the middle ear is associated with hearing outcome, we hypothesized that the post-operative hearing after the BOT may be better compared to CWU and CWD without obliteration. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study on all adult patients who underwent the BOT, CWU without obliteration or CWD without obliteration for primary or revision cholesteatoma between January 2003 and March 2019 with audiological follow-up at our institution. Pre-operative, short-term post-operative and long-term post-operative hearing tests were analyzed and potential factors influencing post-operative hearing were assessed. RESULTS: 626 ears were included. We found no significant differences between the short-term and long-term post-operative audiometry. The pre-operative air–bone gap (ABG) was the factor with the largest effect size on change in air–bone gap (ABG) between pre- and post-operative. When stratifying for this factor along with the type of ossicular chain reconstruction to account for differences at baseline, no significant differences in post-operative ABG were found between BOT and non-obliteration CWU and CWD. CONCLUSION: In this large retrospective cohort study, we found no significant differences in post-operative ABG between the BOT and the non-obliteration CWU and CWD. A solid comparison of hearing between groups remains very challenging as hearing outcome seems to be dependent on many different factors. Hearing outcome seems to be no additional argument to choose for BOT over non-obliteration surgery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00405-022-07367-x. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-04-10 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9519705/ /pubmed/35399107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07367-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Otology van der Toom, Hylke F. E. van der Schroeff, Marc P. Metselaar, Mick van Linge, Anne Vroegop, Jantien L. Pauw, Robert J. A retrospective analysis of hearing after cholesteatoma surgery: the bony obliteration tympanoplasty versus canal wall up and canal wall down without mastoid obliteration |
title | A retrospective analysis of hearing after cholesteatoma surgery: the bony obliteration tympanoplasty versus canal wall up and canal wall down without mastoid obliteration |
title_full | A retrospective analysis of hearing after cholesteatoma surgery: the bony obliteration tympanoplasty versus canal wall up and canal wall down without mastoid obliteration |
title_fullStr | A retrospective analysis of hearing after cholesteatoma surgery: the bony obliteration tympanoplasty versus canal wall up and canal wall down without mastoid obliteration |
title_full_unstemmed | A retrospective analysis of hearing after cholesteatoma surgery: the bony obliteration tympanoplasty versus canal wall up and canal wall down without mastoid obliteration |
title_short | A retrospective analysis of hearing after cholesteatoma surgery: the bony obliteration tympanoplasty versus canal wall up and canal wall down without mastoid obliteration |
title_sort | retrospective analysis of hearing after cholesteatoma surgery: the bony obliteration tympanoplasty versus canal wall up and canal wall down without mastoid obliteration |
topic | Otology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9519705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35399107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07367-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandertoomhylkefe aretrospectiveanalysisofhearingaftercholesteatomasurgerythebonyobliterationtympanoplastyversuscanalwallupandcanalwalldownwithoutmastoidobliteration AT vanderschroeffmarcp aretrospectiveanalysisofhearingaftercholesteatomasurgerythebonyobliterationtympanoplastyversuscanalwallupandcanalwalldownwithoutmastoidobliteration AT metselaarmick aretrospectiveanalysisofhearingaftercholesteatomasurgerythebonyobliterationtympanoplastyversuscanalwallupandcanalwalldownwithoutmastoidobliteration AT vanlingeanne aretrospectiveanalysisofhearingaftercholesteatomasurgerythebonyobliterationtympanoplastyversuscanalwallupandcanalwalldownwithoutmastoidobliteration AT vroegopjantienl aretrospectiveanalysisofhearingaftercholesteatomasurgerythebonyobliterationtympanoplastyversuscanalwallupandcanalwalldownwithoutmastoidobliteration AT pauwrobertj aretrospectiveanalysisofhearingaftercholesteatomasurgerythebonyobliterationtympanoplastyversuscanalwallupandcanalwalldownwithoutmastoidobliteration AT vandertoomhylkefe retrospectiveanalysisofhearingaftercholesteatomasurgerythebonyobliterationtympanoplastyversuscanalwallupandcanalwalldownwithoutmastoidobliteration AT vanderschroeffmarcp retrospectiveanalysisofhearingaftercholesteatomasurgerythebonyobliterationtympanoplastyversuscanalwallupandcanalwalldownwithoutmastoidobliteration AT metselaarmick retrospectiveanalysisofhearingaftercholesteatomasurgerythebonyobliterationtympanoplastyversuscanalwallupandcanalwalldownwithoutmastoidobliteration AT vanlingeanne retrospectiveanalysisofhearingaftercholesteatomasurgerythebonyobliterationtympanoplastyversuscanalwallupandcanalwalldownwithoutmastoidobliteration AT vroegopjantienl retrospectiveanalysisofhearingaftercholesteatomasurgerythebonyobliterationtympanoplastyversuscanalwallupandcanalwalldownwithoutmastoidobliteration AT pauwrobertj retrospectiveanalysisofhearingaftercholesteatomasurgerythebonyobliterationtympanoplastyversuscanalwallupandcanalwalldownwithoutmastoidobliteration |