Cargando…
Prevalence of incidental intracranial findings on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: As the volume and fidelity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain increase, observation of incidental findings may also increase. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the prevalence of various incidental findings. METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and S...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9519720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35525892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-022-05225-7 |
_version_ | 1784799463085178880 |
---|---|
author | Sunny, Divya Elizabeth Amoo, Michael Al Breiki, Maryam Teng, Elite Dong Wen Henry, Jack Javadpour, Mohsen |
author_facet | Sunny, Divya Elizabeth Amoo, Michael Al Breiki, Maryam Teng, Elite Dong Wen Henry, Jack Javadpour, Mohsen |
author_sort | Sunny, Divya Elizabeth |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: As the volume and fidelity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain increase, observation of incidental findings may also increase. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the prevalence of various incidental findings. METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and SCOPUS were searched from inception to May 24, 2021. We identified 6536 citations and included 35 reports of 34 studies, comprising 40,777 participants. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed, and age-stratified estimates for each finding were derived from age-adjusted non-linear models. RESULTS: Vascular abnormalities were observed in 423/35,706 participants (9.1/1000 scans, 95%CI 5.2–14.2), ranging from 2/1000 scans (95%CI 0–7) in 1-year-olds to 16/1000 scans (95%CI 1–43) in 80-year-olds. Of these, 204/34,306 were aneurysms (3.1/1000 scans, 95%CI 1–6.3), which ranged from 0/1000 scans (95%CI 0–5) at 1 year of age to 6/1000 scans (95%CI 3–9) at 60 years. Neoplastic abnormalities were observed in 456/39,040 participants (11.9/1000 scans, 95%CI 7.5–17.2), ranging from 0.2/1000 scans (95%CI 0–10) in 1-year-olds to 34/1000 scans (95%CI 12–66) in 80-year-olds. Meningiomas were the most common, in 246/38,076 participants (5.3/1000 scans, 95%CI 2.3–9.5), ranging from 0/1000 scans (95%CI 0–2) in 1-year-olds to 17/1000 scans (95%CI 4–37) in 80-year-olds. Chiari malformations were observed in 109/27,408 participants (3.7/1000 scans, 95%CI 1.8–6.3), pineal cysts in 1176/32,170 (9/1000 scans, 95%CI 1.8–21.4) and arachnoid cysts in 414/36,367 (8.5/1000 scans, 95%CI 5.8–11.8). CONCLUSION: Incidental findings are common on brain MRI and may result in substantial resource expenditure and patient anxiety but are often of little clinical significance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00701-022-05225-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9519720 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95197202022-09-30 Prevalence of incidental intracranial findings on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis Sunny, Divya Elizabeth Amoo, Michael Al Breiki, Maryam Teng, Elite Dong Wen Henry, Jack Javadpour, Mohsen Acta Neurochir (Wien) Review Article - Neurosurgery general BACKGROUND: As the volume and fidelity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain increase, observation of incidental findings may also increase. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the prevalence of various incidental findings. METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and SCOPUS were searched from inception to May 24, 2021. We identified 6536 citations and included 35 reports of 34 studies, comprising 40,777 participants. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed, and age-stratified estimates for each finding were derived from age-adjusted non-linear models. RESULTS: Vascular abnormalities were observed in 423/35,706 participants (9.1/1000 scans, 95%CI 5.2–14.2), ranging from 2/1000 scans (95%CI 0–7) in 1-year-olds to 16/1000 scans (95%CI 1–43) in 80-year-olds. Of these, 204/34,306 were aneurysms (3.1/1000 scans, 95%CI 1–6.3), which ranged from 0/1000 scans (95%CI 0–5) at 1 year of age to 6/1000 scans (95%CI 3–9) at 60 years. Neoplastic abnormalities were observed in 456/39,040 participants (11.9/1000 scans, 95%CI 7.5–17.2), ranging from 0.2/1000 scans (95%CI 0–10) in 1-year-olds to 34/1000 scans (95%CI 12–66) in 80-year-olds. Meningiomas were the most common, in 246/38,076 participants (5.3/1000 scans, 95%CI 2.3–9.5), ranging from 0/1000 scans (95%CI 0–2) in 1-year-olds to 17/1000 scans (95%CI 4–37) in 80-year-olds. Chiari malformations were observed in 109/27,408 participants (3.7/1000 scans, 95%CI 1.8–6.3), pineal cysts in 1176/32,170 (9/1000 scans, 95%CI 1.8–21.4) and arachnoid cysts in 414/36,367 (8.5/1000 scans, 95%CI 5.8–11.8). CONCLUSION: Incidental findings are common on brain MRI and may result in substantial resource expenditure and patient anxiety but are often of little clinical significance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00701-022-05225-7. Springer Vienna 2022-05-08 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9519720/ /pubmed/35525892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-022-05225-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article - Neurosurgery general Sunny, Divya Elizabeth Amoo, Michael Al Breiki, Maryam Teng, Elite Dong Wen Henry, Jack Javadpour, Mohsen Prevalence of incidental intracranial findings on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Prevalence of incidental intracranial findings on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Prevalence of incidental intracranial findings on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Prevalence of incidental intracranial findings on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence of incidental intracranial findings on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Prevalence of incidental intracranial findings on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | prevalence of incidental intracranial findings on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article - Neurosurgery general |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9519720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35525892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-022-05225-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunnydivyaelizabeth prevalenceofincidentalintracranialfindingsonmagneticresonanceimagingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT amoomichael prevalenceofincidentalintracranialfindingsonmagneticresonanceimagingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT albreikimaryam prevalenceofincidentalintracranialfindingsonmagneticresonanceimagingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tengelitedongwen prevalenceofincidentalintracranialfindingsonmagneticresonanceimagingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT henryjack prevalenceofincidentalintracranialfindingsonmagneticresonanceimagingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT javadpourmohsen prevalenceofincidentalintracranialfindingsonmagneticresonanceimagingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |