Cargando…

Pharmacokinetic Similarity between Biosimilar Insulin Aspart Premix SAR341402 Mix 70/30 and Originator Insulin Aspart Mix 70/30 (NovoMix 30) in Indian Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: GEMELLI M Substudy

BACKGROUND: We compared the pharmacokinetic exposure, efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of biosimilar insulin aspart premix SAR341402 Mix 70/30 (SAR(Asp)-Mix) with its originator NovoMix(®) 30 insulin aspart mix (NN-Mix) in adults with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohan, Viswanathan, Schmider, Wolfgang, Singh, Kiran P., Rotthaeuser, Baerbel, Mukherjee, Bhaswati, Aravind, S. R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9519840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36185965
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijem.ijem_216_22
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: We compared the pharmacokinetic exposure, efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of biosimilar insulin aspart premix SAR341402 Mix 70/30 (SAR(Asp)-Mix) with its originator NovoMix(®) 30 insulin aspart mix (NN-Mix) in adults with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, parallel-group, substudy of the phase 3 GEMELLI M trial performed in three Indian centres. Totally 13 Indian participants previously treated with premix insulin received a single subcutaneous 0.3 U/kg dose of each treatment and underwent pharmacokinetic sampling for 16 h after dosing. Participants were then treated for 26 weeks as per the main GEMELLI M trial with efficacy, safety and immunogenicity compared between groups. RESULTS: The extent of exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve and maximum insulin aspart concentration) to SAR341402 insulin aspart in SAR(Asp)-Mix and to insulin aspart in NN-Mix was similar following single doses of the allocated treatment. After 26 weeks, the mean ± SD [median] change in HbA1c from baseline was similar in both treatment groups (SAR(Asp)-Mix −0.38% ± 1.54 [−1.00%]; NN-Mix −0.18% ± 1.97 [−0.80%]). Other efficacy endpoints, insulin dosages, anti-insulin aspart antibody response, hypoglycemia and adverse events were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the findings from previous studies, that SAR(Asp)-Mix has a similar pharmacokinetic profile to NN-Mix and provides effective glycemic control with similar safety and immunogenicity profile in Indian adults with type 2 diabetes.