Cargando…
The frequency and risk factors of major complications after thermal ablation of liver tumours in 2,084 ablation sessions
BACKGROUND: To assess the frequency of major complications after thermal ablation of liver tumours and to determine risk factors for adverse events. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted between January 2015 and January 2021. A total of 2,084 thermal ablation sessions in 1,592 patients with p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520062/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36189384 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1010043 |
_version_ | 1784799539708821504 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Qiannan Pang, Mengya Zeng, Qingjing He, Xuqi Zheng, Rongqin Ge, Mian Li, Kai |
author_facet | Huang, Qiannan Pang, Mengya Zeng, Qingjing He, Xuqi Zheng, Rongqin Ge, Mian Li, Kai |
author_sort | Huang, Qiannan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To assess the frequency of major complications after thermal ablation of liver tumours and to determine risk factors for adverse events. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted between January 2015 and January 2021. A total of 2,084 thermal ablation sessions in 1,592 patients with primary and metastatic liver tumours were evaluated. The frequency of major complications was evaluated according to the Society of Interventional Radiology Standards, and putative predictors of adverse events were analysed using simple and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Thermal ablation-related mortality was 0.1% (2/2,084), with an overall major complication rate of 5.6% (117/2,084). The most frequent major complication was symptomatic pleural effusion (2.9%, 60/2,084). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a total maximum diameter of lesions >3 cm, microwave ablation (MWA) and MWA combined with radiofrequency ablation, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome were independent prognostic factors for major complications. CONCLUSIONS: Thermal ablation of liver tumours is a safe procedure with an acceptable incidence of major complications. The risk factors identified in this study will help to stratify high-risk patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9520062 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95200622022-09-30 The frequency and risk factors of major complications after thermal ablation of liver tumours in 2,084 ablation sessions Huang, Qiannan Pang, Mengya Zeng, Qingjing He, Xuqi Zheng, Rongqin Ge, Mian Li, Kai Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUND: To assess the frequency of major complications after thermal ablation of liver tumours and to determine risk factors for adverse events. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted between January 2015 and January 2021. A total of 2,084 thermal ablation sessions in 1,592 patients with primary and metastatic liver tumours were evaluated. The frequency of major complications was evaluated according to the Society of Interventional Radiology Standards, and putative predictors of adverse events were analysed using simple and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Thermal ablation-related mortality was 0.1% (2/2,084), with an overall major complication rate of 5.6% (117/2,084). The most frequent major complication was symptomatic pleural effusion (2.9%, 60/2,084). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a total maximum diameter of lesions >3 cm, microwave ablation (MWA) and MWA combined with radiofrequency ablation, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome were independent prognostic factors for major complications. CONCLUSIONS: Thermal ablation of liver tumours is a safe procedure with an acceptable incidence of major complications. The risk factors identified in this study will help to stratify high-risk patients. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9520062/ /pubmed/36189384 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1010043 Text en © 2022 Huang, Pang, Zeng, He, Zheng, Ge and Li. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Huang, Qiannan Pang, Mengya Zeng, Qingjing He, Xuqi Zheng, Rongqin Ge, Mian Li, Kai The frequency and risk factors of major complications after thermal ablation of liver tumours in 2,084 ablation sessions |
title | The frequency and risk factors of major complications after thermal ablation of liver tumours in 2,084 ablation sessions |
title_full | The frequency and risk factors of major complications after thermal ablation of liver tumours in 2,084 ablation sessions |
title_fullStr | The frequency and risk factors of major complications after thermal ablation of liver tumours in 2,084 ablation sessions |
title_full_unstemmed | The frequency and risk factors of major complications after thermal ablation of liver tumours in 2,084 ablation sessions |
title_short | The frequency and risk factors of major complications after thermal ablation of liver tumours in 2,084 ablation sessions |
title_sort | frequency and risk factors of major complications after thermal ablation of liver tumours in 2,084 ablation sessions |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520062/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36189384 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1010043 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangqiannan thefrequencyandriskfactorsofmajorcomplicationsafterthermalablationoflivertumoursin2084ablationsessions AT pangmengya thefrequencyandriskfactorsofmajorcomplicationsafterthermalablationoflivertumoursin2084ablationsessions AT zengqingjing thefrequencyandriskfactorsofmajorcomplicationsafterthermalablationoflivertumoursin2084ablationsessions AT hexuqi thefrequencyandriskfactorsofmajorcomplicationsafterthermalablationoflivertumoursin2084ablationsessions AT zhengrongqin thefrequencyandriskfactorsofmajorcomplicationsafterthermalablationoflivertumoursin2084ablationsessions AT gemian thefrequencyandriskfactorsofmajorcomplicationsafterthermalablationoflivertumoursin2084ablationsessions AT likai thefrequencyandriskfactorsofmajorcomplicationsafterthermalablationoflivertumoursin2084ablationsessions AT huangqiannan frequencyandriskfactorsofmajorcomplicationsafterthermalablationoflivertumoursin2084ablationsessions AT pangmengya frequencyandriskfactorsofmajorcomplicationsafterthermalablationoflivertumoursin2084ablationsessions AT zengqingjing frequencyandriskfactorsofmajorcomplicationsafterthermalablationoflivertumoursin2084ablationsessions AT hexuqi frequencyandriskfactorsofmajorcomplicationsafterthermalablationoflivertumoursin2084ablationsessions AT zhengrongqin frequencyandriskfactorsofmajorcomplicationsafterthermalablationoflivertumoursin2084ablationsessions AT gemian frequencyandriskfactorsofmajorcomplicationsafterthermalablationoflivertumoursin2084ablationsessions AT likai frequencyandriskfactorsofmajorcomplicationsafterthermalablationoflivertumoursin2084ablationsessions |