Cargando…

The frequency and risk factors of major complications after thermal ablation of liver tumours in 2,084 ablation sessions

BACKGROUND: To assess the frequency of major complications after thermal ablation of liver tumours and to determine risk factors for adverse events. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted between January 2015 and January 2021. A total of 2,084 thermal ablation sessions in 1,592 patients with p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Qiannan, Pang, Mengya, Zeng, Qingjing, He, Xuqi, Zheng, Rongqin, Ge, Mian, Li, Kai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36189384
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1010043
_version_ 1784799539708821504
author Huang, Qiannan
Pang, Mengya
Zeng, Qingjing
He, Xuqi
Zheng, Rongqin
Ge, Mian
Li, Kai
author_facet Huang, Qiannan
Pang, Mengya
Zeng, Qingjing
He, Xuqi
Zheng, Rongqin
Ge, Mian
Li, Kai
author_sort Huang, Qiannan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To assess the frequency of major complications after thermal ablation of liver tumours and to determine risk factors for adverse events. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted between January 2015 and January 2021. A total of 2,084 thermal ablation sessions in 1,592 patients with primary and metastatic liver tumours were evaluated. The frequency of major complications was evaluated according to the Society of Interventional Radiology Standards, and putative predictors of adverse events were analysed using simple and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Thermal ablation-related mortality was 0.1% (2/2,084), with an overall major complication rate of 5.6% (117/2,084). The most frequent major complication was symptomatic pleural effusion (2.9%, 60/2,084). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a total maximum diameter of lesions >3 cm, microwave ablation (MWA) and MWA combined with radiofrequency ablation, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome were independent prognostic factors for major complications. CONCLUSIONS: Thermal ablation of liver tumours is a safe procedure with an acceptable incidence of major complications. The risk factors identified in this study will help to stratify high-risk patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9520062
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95200622022-09-30 The frequency and risk factors of major complications after thermal ablation of liver tumours in 2,084 ablation sessions Huang, Qiannan Pang, Mengya Zeng, Qingjing He, Xuqi Zheng, Rongqin Ge, Mian Li, Kai Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUND: To assess the frequency of major complications after thermal ablation of liver tumours and to determine risk factors for adverse events. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted between January 2015 and January 2021. A total of 2,084 thermal ablation sessions in 1,592 patients with primary and metastatic liver tumours were evaluated. The frequency of major complications was evaluated according to the Society of Interventional Radiology Standards, and putative predictors of adverse events were analysed using simple and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Thermal ablation-related mortality was 0.1% (2/2,084), with an overall major complication rate of 5.6% (117/2,084). The most frequent major complication was symptomatic pleural effusion (2.9%, 60/2,084). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a total maximum diameter of lesions >3 cm, microwave ablation (MWA) and MWA combined with radiofrequency ablation, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome were independent prognostic factors for major complications. CONCLUSIONS: Thermal ablation of liver tumours is a safe procedure with an acceptable incidence of major complications. The risk factors identified in this study will help to stratify high-risk patients. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9520062/ /pubmed/36189384 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1010043 Text en © 2022 Huang, Pang, Zeng, He, Zheng, Ge and Li. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Huang, Qiannan
Pang, Mengya
Zeng, Qingjing
He, Xuqi
Zheng, Rongqin
Ge, Mian
Li, Kai
The frequency and risk factors of major complications after thermal ablation of liver tumours in 2,084 ablation sessions
title The frequency and risk factors of major complications after thermal ablation of liver tumours in 2,084 ablation sessions
title_full The frequency and risk factors of major complications after thermal ablation of liver tumours in 2,084 ablation sessions
title_fullStr The frequency and risk factors of major complications after thermal ablation of liver tumours in 2,084 ablation sessions
title_full_unstemmed The frequency and risk factors of major complications after thermal ablation of liver tumours in 2,084 ablation sessions
title_short The frequency and risk factors of major complications after thermal ablation of liver tumours in 2,084 ablation sessions
title_sort frequency and risk factors of major complications after thermal ablation of liver tumours in 2,084 ablation sessions
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36189384
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1010043
work_keys_str_mv AT huangqiannan thefrequencyandriskfactorsofmajorcomplicationsafterthermalablationoflivertumoursin2084ablationsessions
AT pangmengya thefrequencyandriskfactorsofmajorcomplicationsafterthermalablationoflivertumoursin2084ablationsessions
AT zengqingjing thefrequencyandriskfactorsofmajorcomplicationsafterthermalablationoflivertumoursin2084ablationsessions
AT hexuqi thefrequencyandriskfactorsofmajorcomplicationsafterthermalablationoflivertumoursin2084ablationsessions
AT zhengrongqin thefrequencyandriskfactorsofmajorcomplicationsafterthermalablationoflivertumoursin2084ablationsessions
AT gemian thefrequencyandriskfactorsofmajorcomplicationsafterthermalablationoflivertumoursin2084ablationsessions
AT likai thefrequencyandriskfactorsofmajorcomplicationsafterthermalablationoflivertumoursin2084ablationsessions
AT huangqiannan frequencyandriskfactorsofmajorcomplicationsafterthermalablationoflivertumoursin2084ablationsessions
AT pangmengya frequencyandriskfactorsofmajorcomplicationsafterthermalablationoflivertumoursin2084ablationsessions
AT zengqingjing frequencyandriskfactorsofmajorcomplicationsafterthermalablationoflivertumoursin2084ablationsessions
AT hexuqi frequencyandriskfactorsofmajorcomplicationsafterthermalablationoflivertumoursin2084ablationsessions
AT zhengrongqin frequencyandriskfactorsofmajorcomplicationsafterthermalablationoflivertumoursin2084ablationsessions
AT gemian frequencyandriskfactorsofmajorcomplicationsafterthermalablationoflivertumoursin2084ablationsessions
AT likai frequencyandriskfactorsofmajorcomplicationsafterthermalablationoflivertumoursin2084ablationsessions