Cargando…

Determinants of prescribing decisions for off-patent biological medicines in Belgium: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: A competitive market for off-patent biologicals leads to more affordable and high-quality healthcare. In recent years, Belgium has been characterized by its low use of biosimilars and by its shifts from off-patent biologicals toward new alternative therapies. Yet, the prescribing decisio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vandenplas, Yannick, Simoens, Steven, Van Wilder, Philippe, Vulto, Arnold G., Turk, Florian, Huys, Isabelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36175885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08591-1
_version_ 1784799550469308416
author Vandenplas, Yannick
Simoens, Steven
Van Wilder, Philippe
Vulto, Arnold G.
Turk, Florian
Huys, Isabelle
author_facet Vandenplas, Yannick
Simoens, Steven
Van Wilder, Philippe
Vulto, Arnold G.
Turk, Florian
Huys, Isabelle
author_sort Vandenplas, Yannick
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A competitive market for off-patent biologicals leads to more affordable and high-quality healthcare. In recent years, Belgium has been characterized by its low use of biosimilars and by its shifts from off-patent biologicals toward new alternative therapies. Yet, the prescribing decisions involved in these observations are poorly understood. This study aims to better understand prescribing choices among Belgian physicians in the ambulatory care setting. METHODS: This study consisted of two phases. First, a scoping literature review to identify determinants of prescribing choices was conducted. Scientific databases (Embase and PubMed) were searched until 4 November 2021. Second, the nominal group technique (NGT) was employed during focus group discussions with Belgian physicians to consider and validate these determinants for off-patent biologicals in the Belgian context. The qualitative data resulting from the literature review and focus group discussions were analyzed using the thematic framework method. RESULTS: Fifty-three scientific articles that discussed elements that determine prescribing choices were identified. Out of these, 17 determinants of prescribing choices were found. These were divided into five categories: (1) product-related, (2) physicians’ personal, (3) healthcare system-related, (4) patient-related, and (5) determinants related to the pharmaceutical company or brand. Nineteen Belgian physicians from different therapeutic areas that regularly prescribe biologicals then participated in focus group discussions. Using the NGT, the group discussions revealed that prescribing choices for off-patent biologicals are determined by a complex set of elements. Clinical data, geographical region, working environment, pharmaceutical marketing, patient profile, clinical guidelines, and preference of key opinion leaders (KOL) were considered most influential. Physicians indicated that the importance of these determinants differs depending on product classes or therapeutic domain. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple elements determine the choice of an off-patent biological or biosimilar product. The importance of each of these determinants varies depending on the context in which the prescribing choice is made. To increase the prescription of best-value biologicals in the Belgian ambulatory care, a set of synergistic measures is required including information for healthcare providers (HCP) and patients, prescribing feedback, prescribing targets, tangible incentives, KOL involvement, guidelines regarding pharmaceutical promotion, and regular revision of reimbursement modalities. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08591-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9520107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95201072022-09-29 Determinants of prescribing decisions for off-patent biological medicines in Belgium: a qualitative study Vandenplas, Yannick Simoens, Steven Van Wilder, Philippe Vulto, Arnold G. Turk, Florian Huys, Isabelle BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: A competitive market for off-patent biologicals leads to more affordable and high-quality healthcare. In recent years, Belgium has been characterized by its low use of biosimilars and by its shifts from off-patent biologicals toward new alternative therapies. Yet, the prescribing decisions involved in these observations are poorly understood. This study aims to better understand prescribing choices among Belgian physicians in the ambulatory care setting. METHODS: This study consisted of two phases. First, a scoping literature review to identify determinants of prescribing choices was conducted. Scientific databases (Embase and PubMed) were searched until 4 November 2021. Second, the nominal group technique (NGT) was employed during focus group discussions with Belgian physicians to consider and validate these determinants for off-patent biologicals in the Belgian context. The qualitative data resulting from the literature review and focus group discussions were analyzed using the thematic framework method. RESULTS: Fifty-three scientific articles that discussed elements that determine prescribing choices were identified. Out of these, 17 determinants of prescribing choices were found. These were divided into five categories: (1) product-related, (2) physicians’ personal, (3) healthcare system-related, (4) patient-related, and (5) determinants related to the pharmaceutical company or brand. Nineteen Belgian physicians from different therapeutic areas that regularly prescribe biologicals then participated in focus group discussions. Using the NGT, the group discussions revealed that prescribing choices for off-patent biologicals are determined by a complex set of elements. Clinical data, geographical region, working environment, pharmaceutical marketing, patient profile, clinical guidelines, and preference of key opinion leaders (KOL) were considered most influential. Physicians indicated that the importance of these determinants differs depending on product classes or therapeutic domain. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple elements determine the choice of an off-patent biological or biosimilar product. The importance of each of these determinants varies depending on the context in which the prescribing choice is made. To increase the prescription of best-value biologicals in the Belgian ambulatory care, a set of synergistic measures is required including information for healthcare providers (HCP) and patients, prescribing feedback, prescribing targets, tangible incentives, KOL involvement, guidelines regarding pharmaceutical promotion, and regular revision of reimbursement modalities. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08591-1. BioMed Central 2022-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9520107/ /pubmed/36175885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08591-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Vandenplas, Yannick
Simoens, Steven
Van Wilder, Philippe
Vulto, Arnold G.
Turk, Florian
Huys, Isabelle
Determinants of prescribing decisions for off-patent biological medicines in Belgium: a qualitative study
title Determinants of prescribing decisions for off-patent biological medicines in Belgium: a qualitative study
title_full Determinants of prescribing decisions for off-patent biological medicines in Belgium: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Determinants of prescribing decisions for off-patent biological medicines in Belgium: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Determinants of prescribing decisions for off-patent biological medicines in Belgium: a qualitative study
title_short Determinants of prescribing decisions for off-patent biological medicines in Belgium: a qualitative study
title_sort determinants of prescribing decisions for off-patent biological medicines in belgium: a qualitative study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36175885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08591-1
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenplasyannick determinantsofprescribingdecisionsforoffpatentbiologicalmedicinesinbelgiumaqualitativestudy
AT simoenssteven determinantsofprescribingdecisionsforoffpatentbiologicalmedicinesinbelgiumaqualitativestudy
AT vanwilderphilippe determinantsofprescribingdecisionsforoffpatentbiologicalmedicinesinbelgiumaqualitativestudy
AT vultoarnoldg determinantsofprescribingdecisionsforoffpatentbiologicalmedicinesinbelgiumaqualitativestudy
AT turkflorian determinantsofprescribingdecisionsforoffpatentbiologicalmedicinesinbelgiumaqualitativestudy
AT huysisabelle determinantsofprescribingdecisionsforoffpatentbiologicalmedicinesinbelgiumaqualitativestudy