Cargando…
Angiosome-directed endovascular intervention and infrapopliteal disease: Intraoperative evaluation of distal hemodynamic changes and foot blood volume of lower extremity
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate foot blood volume and hemodynamics and explore whether quantitative techniques can guide revascularization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective single-center cohort study included thirty-three patients with infrapopliteal artery occlusion who underwent percutaneous translumi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520246/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36189392 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.988639 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate foot blood volume and hemodynamics and explore whether quantitative techniques can guide revascularization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective single-center cohort study included thirty-three patients with infrapopliteal artery occlusion who underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) between November 2016 and May 2020. The time-to-peak (TTP) from color-coded quantitative digital subtraction angiography (CCQ-DSA) and parenchymal blood volume (PBV) were used to evaluate the blood volume and hemodynamic changes in different regions of the foot before and after the operation. RESULTS: After the intervention procedure, the overall blood volume significantly increased from 25.15 ± 21.1 ml/1,000 ml to 72.33 ± 29.3 ml/1,000 ml (p < 0.001, with an average increase of 47.18 ml/1,000 ml. The overall TTP decrease rate, postoperative blood flow time significantly faster than those preoperatively, from 22.93 ± 7.83 to 14.85 ± 5.9 s (p < 0.001, with an average decrease of 8.08 s). Direct revascularization (DR) resulted in significant blood volume improvement than compared with indirect revascularization (IR) [188% (28, 320) vs.51% (10, 110), p = 0.029]. Patients with DR had a significantly faster blood flow time than those with IR [80% (12, 180) vs. 26% (5, 80), p = 0.032]. The ankle-brachial index (ABI) of the affected extremity also showed an significant change from 0.49 ± 0.3 to 0.63 ± 0.24 (p < 0.001) after the intervention. The relative values of ΔTTP and ΔABI showed a weak correlation (r = −0.330). CONCLUSIONS: The quantitative measurement results based on PBV and CCQ-DSA techniques showed that the overall blood volume increased significantly and that the foot distal hemodynamics were significantly improved after endovascular treatment. DR in the ischemic area could r improve foot perfusion. |
---|