Cargando…

超高效液相色谱-电雾式检测器测定福建产绞股蓝中绞股蓝皂苷XLVI和LVI

Gynostemma pentaphyllum (Thunb.) Makino contains dammarane-type triterpenoid saponins, similar to ginseng, with a host of pharmacological activities. However, its planting resources and chemical composition are quite complex. The chemical constituents of Gynostemma pentaphyllum vary drastically amon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: LU, Pengxin, LI, Gang, ZHENG, Wei, LIANG, Haizhen, ZHANG, Jie, CHAI, Ruiping, LUO, Dingqiang, JIN, Yan, GUO, Baolin, MA, Baiping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Editorial board of Chinese Journal of Chromatography 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36156630
http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1123.2022.01024
_version_ 1784799611061272576
author LU, Pengxin
LI, Gang
ZHENG, Wei
LIANG, Haizhen
ZHANG, Jie
CHAI, Ruiping
LUO, Dingqiang
JIN, Yan
GUO, Baolin
MA, Baiping
author_facet LU, Pengxin
LI, Gang
ZHENG, Wei
LIANG, Haizhen
ZHANG, Jie
CHAI, Ruiping
LUO, Dingqiang
JIN, Yan
GUO, Baolin
MA, Baiping
author_sort LU, Pengxin
collection PubMed
description Gynostemma pentaphyllum (Thunb.) Makino contains dammarane-type triterpenoid saponins, similar to ginseng, with a host of pharmacological activities. However, its planting resources and chemical composition are quite complex. The chemical constituents of Gynostemma pentaphyllum vary drastically among different origins and varieties. Thus, the corresponding quality control methods also need to be different. Currently, limited information is available about the quality control of Gynostemma pentaphyllum from Fujian. A new method based on ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-charged aerosol detection (UHPLC-CAD) was established for the determination of gypenoside XLVI and LVI in Gynostemma pentaphyllum. The major components of Gynostemma pentaphyllum were characterized using UHPLC-quadrupole time-of-flight-mass spectrometry (UHPLC-Q-TOF/MS) combined with UHPLC-CAD. The results revealed gypenoside XLVI, LVI, and their corresponding malonyl-containing acidic saponins as the main components. However, malonylgypenoside XLVI and LVI can easily remove their malonyl group and convert to gypenoside XLVI and LVI during the application of Gynostemma pentaphyllum. In this study, the samples were pretreated using alkali hydrolysis to transform the acid saponins completely, and the final contents of gypenoside XLVI and LVI were determined via UHPLC-CAD. The optimal alkaline hydrolysis, extraction, and liquid chromatography conditions were established. First, the alkaline hydrolysis conditions were optimized. The effects of the volume of ammonia and reaction time on the contents of gypenoside XLVI, LVI, malonylgypenoside XLVI, and LVI were examined. Malonylgypenoside XLVI and LVI could be transformed completely to gypenoside XLVI and LVI by standing for 24 h in an ethanol-water-ammonia (50∶46∶4, v/v/v) mixture. Furthermore, the extraction conditions were optimized. Next, effects of the different solvents, extraction time, and solid-liquid ratio on the extraction rates of gypenoside XLVI and LVI were investigated. The extraction method for Gynostemma pentaphyllum powder using the ethanol-water-ammonia (50∶46∶4, v/v/v) and a solid-liquid ratio of 1∶150 (g∶mL) for 30 min was established. Finally, a prepared test solution was separated on a Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 chromatographic column (100 mm×2.1 mm, 1.7 μm). Acetonitrile and 0.1% (v/v) formic acid aqueous solution were used as the mobile phases for gradient elution. The flow rate was set to 0.5 mL/min and column temperature was maintained at 40 ℃. The separation was detected using a charged aerosol detector. Results indicated that the logarithm of the mass concentrations of gypenoside XLVI and LVI had a linear relationship with the logarithm of the peak area in the range of 9.94-318.00 μg/mL and 12.78-409.00 μg/mL, respectively. The correlation coefficients (r) were 0.9993 and 0.9995, respectively. The limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ) of gypenoside XLVI were 1.58 μg/mL and 6.36 μg/mL, respectively. The LOD and LOQ of gypenoside LVI were 2.05 μg/mL and 8.18 μg/mL, respectively. The relative standard deviations (RSDs) of precision, repeatability, and 24 h stability were less than 2.0% (n=6). The spiked recoveries of gypenoside XLVI were 100.2%-107.2% and the RSD value was 2.4%. The spiked recoveries of gypenoside LVI were 97.9%-104.2% and the RSD value was 2.6%. The results of 16 batches of Gynostemma pentaphyllum samples indicated that the gypenoside XLVI content was 0.57%-2.57%, and gypenoside LVI content was 0.66%-2.99%. Hence, this method has high sensitivity and good reproducibility. Therefore, it can be used for quality research and quality control of Gynostemma pentaphyllum from Fujian.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9520372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Editorial board of Chinese Journal of Chromatography
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95203722022-09-30 超高效液相色谱-电雾式检测器测定福建产绞股蓝中绞股蓝皂苷XLVI和LVI LU, Pengxin LI, Gang ZHENG, Wei LIANG, Haizhen ZHANG, Jie CHAI, Ruiping LUO, Dingqiang JIN, Yan GUO, Baolin MA, Baiping Se Pu Special Column for ThermoFisher Gynostemma pentaphyllum (Thunb.) Makino contains dammarane-type triterpenoid saponins, similar to ginseng, with a host of pharmacological activities. However, its planting resources and chemical composition are quite complex. The chemical constituents of Gynostemma pentaphyllum vary drastically among different origins and varieties. Thus, the corresponding quality control methods also need to be different. Currently, limited information is available about the quality control of Gynostemma pentaphyllum from Fujian. A new method based on ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-charged aerosol detection (UHPLC-CAD) was established for the determination of gypenoside XLVI and LVI in Gynostemma pentaphyllum. The major components of Gynostemma pentaphyllum were characterized using UHPLC-quadrupole time-of-flight-mass spectrometry (UHPLC-Q-TOF/MS) combined with UHPLC-CAD. The results revealed gypenoside XLVI, LVI, and their corresponding malonyl-containing acidic saponins as the main components. However, malonylgypenoside XLVI and LVI can easily remove their malonyl group and convert to gypenoside XLVI and LVI during the application of Gynostemma pentaphyllum. In this study, the samples were pretreated using alkali hydrolysis to transform the acid saponins completely, and the final contents of gypenoside XLVI and LVI were determined via UHPLC-CAD. The optimal alkaline hydrolysis, extraction, and liquid chromatography conditions were established. First, the alkaline hydrolysis conditions were optimized. The effects of the volume of ammonia and reaction time on the contents of gypenoside XLVI, LVI, malonylgypenoside XLVI, and LVI were examined. Malonylgypenoside XLVI and LVI could be transformed completely to gypenoside XLVI and LVI by standing for 24 h in an ethanol-water-ammonia (50∶46∶4, v/v/v) mixture. Furthermore, the extraction conditions were optimized. Next, effects of the different solvents, extraction time, and solid-liquid ratio on the extraction rates of gypenoside XLVI and LVI were investigated. The extraction method for Gynostemma pentaphyllum powder using the ethanol-water-ammonia (50∶46∶4, v/v/v) and a solid-liquid ratio of 1∶150 (g∶mL) for 30 min was established. Finally, a prepared test solution was separated on a Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 chromatographic column (100 mm×2.1 mm, 1.7 μm). Acetonitrile and 0.1% (v/v) formic acid aqueous solution were used as the mobile phases for gradient elution. The flow rate was set to 0.5 mL/min and column temperature was maintained at 40 ℃. The separation was detected using a charged aerosol detector. Results indicated that the logarithm of the mass concentrations of gypenoside XLVI and LVI had a linear relationship with the logarithm of the peak area in the range of 9.94-318.00 μg/mL and 12.78-409.00 μg/mL, respectively. The correlation coefficients (r) were 0.9993 and 0.9995, respectively. The limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ) of gypenoside XLVI were 1.58 μg/mL and 6.36 μg/mL, respectively. The LOD and LOQ of gypenoside LVI were 2.05 μg/mL and 8.18 μg/mL, respectively. The relative standard deviations (RSDs) of precision, repeatability, and 24 h stability were less than 2.0% (n=6). The spiked recoveries of gypenoside XLVI were 100.2%-107.2% and the RSD value was 2.4%. The spiked recoveries of gypenoside LVI were 97.9%-104.2% and the RSD value was 2.6%. The results of 16 batches of Gynostemma pentaphyllum samples indicated that the gypenoside XLVI content was 0.57%-2.57%, and gypenoside LVI content was 0.66%-2.99%. Hence, this method has high sensitivity and good reproducibility. Therefore, it can be used for quality research and quality control of Gynostemma pentaphyllum from Fujian. Editorial board of Chinese Journal of Chromatography 2022-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9520372/ /pubmed/36156630 http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1123.2022.01024 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/本文是开放获取文章,遵循CC BY 4.0协议 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Special Column for ThermoFisher
LU, Pengxin
LI, Gang
ZHENG, Wei
LIANG, Haizhen
ZHANG, Jie
CHAI, Ruiping
LUO, Dingqiang
JIN, Yan
GUO, Baolin
MA, Baiping
超高效液相色谱-电雾式检测器测定福建产绞股蓝中绞股蓝皂苷XLVI和LVI
title 超高效液相色谱-电雾式检测器测定福建产绞股蓝中绞股蓝皂苷XLVI和LVI
title_full 超高效液相色谱-电雾式检测器测定福建产绞股蓝中绞股蓝皂苷XLVI和LVI
title_fullStr 超高效液相色谱-电雾式检测器测定福建产绞股蓝中绞股蓝皂苷XLVI和LVI
title_full_unstemmed 超高效液相色谱-电雾式检测器测定福建产绞股蓝中绞股蓝皂苷XLVI和LVI
title_short 超高效液相色谱-电雾式检测器测定福建产绞股蓝中绞股蓝皂苷XLVI和LVI
title_sort 超高效液相色谱-电雾式检测器测定福建产绞股蓝中绞股蓝皂苷xlvi和lvi
topic Special Column for ThermoFisher
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36156630
http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1123.2022.01024
work_keys_str_mv AT lupengxin chāogāoxiàoyèxiāngsèpǔdiànwùshìjiǎncèqìcèdìngfújiànchǎnjiǎogǔlánzhōngjiǎogǔlánzàogānxlvihélvi
AT ligang chāogāoxiàoyèxiāngsèpǔdiànwùshìjiǎncèqìcèdìngfújiànchǎnjiǎogǔlánzhōngjiǎogǔlánzàogānxlvihélvi
AT zhengwei chāogāoxiàoyèxiāngsèpǔdiànwùshìjiǎncèqìcèdìngfújiànchǎnjiǎogǔlánzhōngjiǎogǔlánzàogānxlvihélvi
AT lianghaizhen chāogāoxiàoyèxiāngsèpǔdiànwùshìjiǎncèqìcèdìngfújiànchǎnjiǎogǔlánzhōngjiǎogǔlánzàogānxlvihélvi
AT zhangjie chāogāoxiàoyèxiāngsèpǔdiànwùshìjiǎncèqìcèdìngfújiànchǎnjiǎogǔlánzhōngjiǎogǔlánzàogānxlvihélvi
AT chairuiping chāogāoxiàoyèxiāngsèpǔdiànwùshìjiǎncèqìcèdìngfújiànchǎnjiǎogǔlánzhōngjiǎogǔlánzàogānxlvihélvi
AT luodingqiang chāogāoxiàoyèxiāngsèpǔdiànwùshìjiǎncèqìcèdìngfújiànchǎnjiǎogǔlánzhōngjiǎogǔlánzàogānxlvihélvi
AT jinyan chāogāoxiàoyèxiāngsèpǔdiànwùshìjiǎncèqìcèdìngfújiànchǎnjiǎogǔlánzhōngjiǎogǔlánzàogānxlvihélvi
AT guobaolin chāogāoxiàoyèxiāngsèpǔdiànwùshìjiǎncèqìcèdìngfújiànchǎnjiǎogǔlánzhōngjiǎogǔlánzàogānxlvihélvi
AT mabaiping chāogāoxiàoyèxiāngsèpǔdiànwùshìjiǎncèqìcèdìngfújiànchǎnjiǎogǔlánzhōngjiǎogǔlánzàogānxlvihélvi