Cargando…

Cardiac resynchronization considerations in left bundle branch block

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) via biventricular pacing (BiVP) is an established treatment for patients with left ventricular systolic heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay resulting in wide QRS. Seminal trials demonstrating mortality benefit from CRT were conducted in patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kong, Nathan W., Upadhyay, Gaurav A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36187776
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.962042
_version_ 1784799628611289088
author Kong, Nathan W.
Upadhyay, Gaurav A.
author_facet Kong, Nathan W.
Upadhyay, Gaurav A.
author_sort Kong, Nathan W.
collection PubMed
description Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) via biventricular pacing (BiVP) is an established treatment for patients with left ventricular systolic heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay resulting in wide QRS. Seminal trials demonstrating mortality benefit from CRT were conducted in patients with wide left bundle branch block (LBBB) pattern on electrocardiogram (ECG) and evidence of clinical heart failure. The presence of conduction block was assumed to correlate with commonly applied criteria for LBBB. More recent data has challenged this assertion, revealing that LBBB pattern may include distinct underlying pathophysiology, including patients with complete conduction block, either at the left-sided His fibers or the proximal left bundle, intact Purkinje activation with wide LBBB-like QRS, and patients demonstrating both proximal block and distal delay. Currently, BiVP-CRT is indicated for all QRS duration ≥150 ms and may be considered for BBB patterns from 130 to 149 ms with robust clinical data to support its use. Despite this, however, there remains a significant number of non-responders to BVP. Conduction system pacing (CSP) has emerged as an alternative approach to deliver CRT and correct QRS in patients with conduction block. Newer hybrid approaches which combine CSP and traditional BiVP-CRT and may hold promise for patients with IP or mixed-level block. As various approaches to CRT continue to be studied, physiologic phenotyping of the LBBB pattern remains an important consideration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9520457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95204572022-09-30 Cardiac resynchronization considerations in left bundle branch block Kong, Nathan W. Upadhyay, Gaurav A. Front Physiol Physiology Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) via biventricular pacing (BiVP) is an established treatment for patients with left ventricular systolic heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay resulting in wide QRS. Seminal trials demonstrating mortality benefit from CRT were conducted in patients with wide left bundle branch block (LBBB) pattern on electrocardiogram (ECG) and evidence of clinical heart failure. The presence of conduction block was assumed to correlate with commonly applied criteria for LBBB. More recent data has challenged this assertion, revealing that LBBB pattern may include distinct underlying pathophysiology, including patients with complete conduction block, either at the left-sided His fibers or the proximal left bundle, intact Purkinje activation with wide LBBB-like QRS, and patients demonstrating both proximal block and distal delay. Currently, BiVP-CRT is indicated for all QRS duration ≥150 ms and may be considered for BBB patterns from 130 to 149 ms with robust clinical data to support its use. Despite this, however, there remains a significant number of non-responders to BVP. Conduction system pacing (CSP) has emerged as an alternative approach to deliver CRT and correct QRS in patients with conduction block. Newer hybrid approaches which combine CSP and traditional BiVP-CRT and may hold promise for patients with IP or mixed-level block. As various approaches to CRT continue to be studied, physiologic phenotyping of the LBBB pattern remains an important consideration. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9520457/ /pubmed/36187776 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.962042 Text en Copyright © 2022 Kong and Upadhyay. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Kong, Nathan W.
Upadhyay, Gaurav A.
Cardiac resynchronization considerations in left bundle branch block
title Cardiac resynchronization considerations in left bundle branch block
title_full Cardiac resynchronization considerations in left bundle branch block
title_fullStr Cardiac resynchronization considerations in left bundle branch block
title_full_unstemmed Cardiac resynchronization considerations in left bundle branch block
title_short Cardiac resynchronization considerations in left bundle branch block
title_sort cardiac resynchronization considerations in left bundle branch block
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36187776
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.962042
work_keys_str_mv AT kongnathanw cardiacresynchronizationconsiderationsinleftbundlebranchblock
AT upadhyaygaurava cardiacresynchronizationconsiderationsinleftbundlebranchblock