Cargando…
Empirically supported psychodynamic psychotherapy for common mental disorders–An update applying revised criteria: Systematic review protocol
The approach of evidence-based medicine has been extended to psychotherapy. More than 20 years ago, criteria for empirically supported psychotherapeutic treatments (ESTs) were defined. Meanwhile a new model for empirically supported psychotherapeutic treatments has been proposed. While the empirical...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36186863 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.976885 |
_version_ | 1784799665189814272 |
---|---|
author | Leichsenring, Falk Abbass, Allan Heim, Nikolas Keefe, John R. Luyten, Patrick Rabung, Sven Steinert, Christiane |
author_facet | Leichsenring, Falk Abbass, Allan Heim, Nikolas Keefe, John R. Luyten, Patrick Rabung, Sven Steinert, Christiane |
author_sort | Leichsenring, Falk |
collection | PubMed |
description | The approach of evidence-based medicine has been extended to psychotherapy. More than 20 years ago, criteria for empirically supported psychotherapeutic treatments (ESTs) were defined. Meanwhile a new model for empirically supported psychotherapeutic treatments has been proposed. While the empirical status of psychodynamic therapy (PDT) was assessed in several reviews using the previous criteria, the proposed new model has not yet been applied to PDT. For this reason, we will carry out a systematic review on studies of PDT in common mental disorders applying the revised criteria of ESTs. As suggested by the new model we will focus on recent systematic quantitative reviews. A systematic search for meta-analyses on the efficacy of PDT in common mental disorders will be carried out. Meta-analyses will be selected and evaluated by at least two raters along the criteria of the new proposed model. In addition, systematic reviews and individual studies addressing mechanisms of change in PDT, effectiveness under real-world conditions, cost-effectiveness and adverse events will be systematically searched for and evaluated. Finally, quality of evidence, the extent to which benefits exceed harms and strength of recommendations will be assessed per disorder using GRADE. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9520618 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95206182022-09-30 Empirically supported psychodynamic psychotherapy for common mental disorders–An update applying revised criteria: Systematic review protocol Leichsenring, Falk Abbass, Allan Heim, Nikolas Keefe, John R. Luyten, Patrick Rabung, Sven Steinert, Christiane Front Psychiatry Psychiatry The approach of evidence-based medicine has been extended to psychotherapy. More than 20 years ago, criteria for empirically supported psychotherapeutic treatments (ESTs) were defined. Meanwhile a new model for empirically supported psychotherapeutic treatments has been proposed. While the empirical status of psychodynamic therapy (PDT) was assessed in several reviews using the previous criteria, the proposed new model has not yet been applied to PDT. For this reason, we will carry out a systematic review on studies of PDT in common mental disorders applying the revised criteria of ESTs. As suggested by the new model we will focus on recent systematic quantitative reviews. A systematic search for meta-analyses on the efficacy of PDT in common mental disorders will be carried out. Meta-analyses will be selected and evaluated by at least two raters along the criteria of the new proposed model. In addition, systematic reviews and individual studies addressing mechanisms of change in PDT, effectiveness under real-world conditions, cost-effectiveness and adverse events will be systematically searched for and evaluated. Finally, quality of evidence, the extent to which benefits exceed harms and strength of recommendations will be assessed per disorder using GRADE. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9520618/ /pubmed/36186863 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.976885 Text en Copyright © 2022 Leichsenring, Abbass, Heim, Keefe, Luyten, Rabung and Steinert. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry Leichsenring, Falk Abbass, Allan Heim, Nikolas Keefe, John R. Luyten, Patrick Rabung, Sven Steinert, Christiane Empirically supported psychodynamic psychotherapy for common mental disorders–An update applying revised criteria: Systematic review protocol |
title | Empirically supported psychodynamic psychotherapy for common mental disorders–An update applying revised criteria: Systematic review protocol |
title_full | Empirically supported psychodynamic psychotherapy for common mental disorders–An update applying revised criteria: Systematic review protocol |
title_fullStr | Empirically supported psychodynamic psychotherapy for common mental disorders–An update applying revised criteria: Systematic review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Empirically supported psychodynamic psychotherapy for common mental disorders–An update applying revised criteria: Systematic review protocol |
title_short | Empirically supported psychodynamic psychotherapy for common mental disorders–An update applying revised criteria: Systematic review protocol |
title_sort | empirically supported psychodynamic psychotherapy for common mental disorders–an update applying revised criteria: systematic review protocol |
topic | Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36186863 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.976885 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leichsenringfalk empiricallysupportedpsychodynamicpsychotherapyforcommonmentaldisordersanupdateapplyingrevisedcriteriasystematicreviewprotocol AT abbassallan empiricallysupportedpsychodynamicpsychotherapyforcommonmentaldisordersanupdateapplyingrevisedcriteriasystematicreviewprotocol AT heimnikolas empiricallysupportedpsychodynamicpsychotherapyforcommonmentaldisordersanupdateapplyingrevisedcriteriasystematicreviewprotocol AT keefejohnr empiricallysupportedpsychodynamicpsychotherapyforcommonmentaldisordersanupdateapplyingrevisedcriteriasystematicreviewprotocol AT luytenpatrick empiricallysupportedpsychodynamicpsychotherapyforcommonmentaldisordersanupdateapplyingrevisedcriteriasystematicreviewprotocol AT rabungsven empiricallysupportedpsychodynamicpsychotherapyforcommonmentaldisordersanupdateapplyingrevisedcriteriasystematicreviewprotocol AT steinertchristiane empiricallysupportedpsychodynamicpsychotherapyforcommonmentaldisordersanupdateapplyingrevisedcriteriasystematicreviewprotocol |