Cargando…

Empirically supported psychodynamic psychotherapy for common mental disorders–An update applying revised criteria: Systematic review protocol

The approach of evidence-based medicine has been extended to psychotherapy. More than 20 years ago, criteria for empirically supported psychotherapeutic treatments (ESTs) were defined. Meanwhile a new model for empirically supported psychotherapeutic treatments has been proposed. While the empirical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leichsenring, Falk, Abbass, Allan, Heim, Nikolas, Keefe, John R., Luyten, Patrick, Rabung, Sven, Steinert, Christiane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36186863
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.976885
_version_ 1784799665189814272
author Leichsenring, Falk
Abbass, Allan
Heim, Nikolas
Keefe, John R.
Luyten, Patrick
Rabung, Sven
Steinert, Christiane
author_facet Leichsenring, Falk
Abbass, Allan
Heim, Nikolas
Keefe, John R.
Luyten, Patrick
Rabung, Sven
Steinert, Christiane
author_sort Leichsenring, Falk
collection PubMed
description The approach of evidence-based medicine has been extended to psychotherapy. More than 20 years ago, criteria for empirically supported psychotherapeutic treatments (ESTs) were defined. Meanwhile a new model for empirically supported psychotherapeutic treatments has been proposed. While the empirical status of psychodynamic therapy (PDT) was assessed in several reviews using the previous criteria, the proposed new model has not yet been applied to PDT. For this reason, we will carry out a systematic review on studies of PDT in common mental disorders applying the revised criteria of ESTs. As suggested by the new model we will focus on recent systematic quantitative reviews. A systematic search for meta-analyses on the efficacy of PDT in common mental disorders will be carried out. Meta-analyses will be selected and evaluated by at least two raters along the criteria of the new proposed model. In addition, systematic reviews and individual studies addressing mechanisms of change in PDT, effectiveness under real-world conditions, cost-effectiveness and adverse events will be systematically searched for and evaluated. Finally, quality of evidence, the extent to which benefits exceed harms and strength of recommendations will be assessed per disorder using GRADE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9520618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95206182022-09-30 Empirically supported psychodynamic psychotherapy for common mental disorders–An update applying revised criteria: Systematic review protocol Leichsenring, Falk Abbass, Allan Heim, Nikolas Keefe, John R. Luyten, Patrick Rabung, Sven Steinert, Christiane Front Psychiatry Psychiatry The approach of evidence-based medicine has been extended to psychotherapy. More than 20 years ago, criteria for empirically supported psychotherapeutic treatments (ESTs) were defined. Meanwhile a new model for empirically supported psychotherapeutic treatments has been proposed. While the empirical status of psychodynamic therapy (PDT) was assessed in several reviews using the previous criteria, the proposed new model has not yet been applied to PDT. For this reason, we will carry out a systematic review on studies of PDT in common mental disorders applying the revised criteria of ESTs. As suggested by the new model we will focus on recent systematic quantitative reviews. A systematic search for meta-analyses on the efficacy of PDT in common mental disorders will be carried out. Meta-analyses will be selected and evaluated by at least two raters along the criteria of the new proposed model. In addition, systematic reviews and individual studies addressing mechanisms of change in PDT, effectiveness under real-world conditions, cost-effectiveness and adverse events will be systematically searched for and evaluated. Finally, quality of evidence, the extent to which benefits exceed harms and strength of recommendations will be assessed per disorder using GRADE. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9520618/ /pubmed/36186863 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.976885 Text en Copyright © 2022 Leichsenring, Abbass, Heim, Keefe, Luyten, Rabung and Steinert. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Leichsenring, Falk
Abbass, Allan
Heim, Nikolas
Keefe, John R.
Luyten, Patrick
Rabung, Sven
Steinert, Christiane
Empirically supported psychodynamic psychotherapy for common mental disorders–An update applying revised criteria: Systematic review protocol
title Empirically supported psychodynamic psychotherapy for common mental disorders–An update applying revised criteria: Systematic review protocol
title_full Empirically supported psychodynamic psychotherapy for common mental disorders–An update applying revised criteria: Systematic review protocol
title_fullStr Empirically supported psychodynamic psychotherapy for common mental disorders–An update applying revised criteria: Systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Empirically supported psychodynamic psychotherapy for common mental disorders–An update applying revised criteria: Systematic review protocol
title_short Empirically supported psychodynamic psychotherapy for common mental disorders–An update applying revised criteria: Systematic review protocol
title_sort empirically supported psychodynamic psychotherapy for common mental disorders–an update applying revised criteria: systematic review protocol
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36186863
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.976885
work_keys_str_mv AT leichsenringfalk empiricallysupportedpsychodynamicpsychotherapyforcommonmentaldisordersanupdateapplyingrevisedcriteriasystematicreviewprotocol
AT abbassallan empiricallysupportedpsychodynamicpsychotherapyforcommonmentaldisordersanupdateapplyingrevisedcriteriasystematicreviewprotocol
AT heimnikolas empiricallysupportedpsychodynamicpsychotherapyforcommonmentaldisordersanupdateapplyingrevisedcriteriasystematicreviewprotocol
AT keefejohnr empiricallysupportedpsychodynamicpsychotherapyforcommonmentaldisordersanupdateapplyingrevisedcriteriasystematicreviewprotocol
AT luytenpatrick empiricallysupportedpsychodynamicpsychotherapyforcommonmentaldisordersanupdateapplyingrevisedcriteriasystematicreviewprotocol
AT rabungsven empiricallysupportedpsychodynamicpsychotherapyforcommonmentaldisordersanupdateapplyingrevisedcriteriasystematicreviewprotocol
AT steinertchristiane empiricallysupportedpsychodynamicpsychotherapyforcommonmentaldisordersanupdateapplyingrevisedcriteriasystematicreviewprotocol