Cargando…

The use of the Decision Regret Scale in non-clinical contexts

The Decision Regret Scale (DRS) was assessed for its psychometric qualities in measuring decision regret in ordinary life scenarios. Although the scale has typically been used with patients and in the context of medical decision-making in earlier studies, this contribution shows that the instrument...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Diotaiuti, Pierluigi, Valente, Giuseppe, Mancone, Stefania, Grambone, Angela, Chirico, Andrea, Lucidi, Fabio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36186382
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.945669
_version_ 1784799666391482368
author Diotaiuti, Pierluigi
Valente, Giuseppe
Mancone, Stefania
Grambone, Angela
Chirico, Andrea
Lucidi, Fabio
author_facet Diotaiuti, Pierluigi
Valente, Giuseppe
Mancone, Stefania
Grambone, Angela
Chirico, Andrea
Lucidi, Fabio
author_sort Diotaiuti, Pierluigi
collection PubMed
description The Decision Regret Scale (DRS) was assessed for its psychometric qualities in measuring decision regret in ordinary life scenarios. Although the scale has typically been used with patients and in the context of medical decision-making in earlier studies, this contribution shows that the instrument may have a variety of uses, retaining excellent metric properties even in non-medical contexts. The tool showed good fits with both the CFA and the gender Measurement Invariance. A non-probabilistic selection of 2,534 Italian university students was conducted. The internal consistency measures were found to be completely appropriate. Correlations with the General Decision-Making Style (GDMS) and Scale of Regulatory Modes were used to check for convergent validity (SRM). Convergence analysis showed that participants with higher regret scores were those who favored a rational decision-making style, while lower regret scores correlated with avoidant and spontaneous styles. With regard to the regulatory modes, the relationship between regret and locomotion was positive. Overall, the directions of association point to an interesting predictive measure of a person’s decision-making and self-regulatory orientation through the evaluation of regret using the DRS. The excellent psychometric properties found foreshadow a reliable use in various contexts where knowledge of post-decisional attitude becomes important: school, university, professional orientation, marketing studies, relationship choices, as well as for use in research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9520623
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95206232022-09-30 The use of the Decision Regret Scale in non-clinical contexts Diotaiuti, Pierluigi Valente, Giuseppe Mancone, Stefania Grambone, Angela Chirico, Andrea Lucidi, Fabio Front Psychol Psychology The Decision Regret Scale (DRS) was assessed for its psychometric qualities in measuring decision regret in ordinary life scenarios. Although the scale has typically been used with patients and in the context of medical decision-making in earlier studies, this contribution shows that the instrument may have a variety of uses, retaining excellent metric properties even in non-medical contexts. The tool showed good fits with both the CFA and the gender Measurement Invariance. A non-probabilistic selection of 2,534 Italian university students was conducted. The internal consistency measures were found to be completely appropriate. Correlations with the General Decision-Making Style (GDMS) and Scale of Regulatory Modes were used to check for convergent validity (SRM). Convergence analysis showed that participants with higher regret scores were those who favored a rational decision-making style, while lower regret scores correlated with avoidant and spontaneous styles. With regard to the regulatory modes, the relationship between regret and locomotion was positive. Overall, the directions of association point to an interesting predictive measure of a person’s decision-making and self-regulatory orientation through the evaluation of regret using the DRS. The excellent psychometric properties found foreshadow a reliable use in various contexts where knowledge of post-decisional attitude becomes important: school, university, professional orientation, marketing studies, relationship choices, as well as for use in research. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9520623/ /pubmed/36186382 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.945669 Text en Copyright © 2022 Diotaiuti, Valente, Mancone, Grambone, Chirico and Lucidi. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Diotaiuti, Pierluigi
Valente, Giuseppe
Mancone, Stefania
Grambone, Angela
Chirico, Andrea
Lucidi, Fabio
The use of the Decision Regret Scale in non-clinical contexts
title The use of the Decision Regret Scale in non-clinical contexts
title_full The use of the Decision Regret Scale in non-clinical contexts
title_fullStr The use of the Decision Regret Scale in non-clinical contexts
title_full_unstemmed The use of the Decision Regret Scale in non-clinical contexts
title_short The use of the Decision Regret Scale in non-clinical contexts
title_sort use of the decision regret scale in non-clinical contexts
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36186382
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.945669
work_keys_str_mv AT diotaiutipierluigi theuseofthedecisionregretscaleinnonclinicalcontexts
AT valentegiuseppe theuseofthedecisionregretscaleinnonclinicalcontexts
AT manconestefania theuseofthedecisionregretscaleinnonclinicalcontexts
AT gramboneangela theuseofthedecisionregretscaleinnonclinicalcontexts
AT chiricoandrea theuseofthedecisionregretscaleinnonclinicalcontexts
AT lucidifabio theuseofthedecisionregretscaleinnonclinicalcontexts
AT diotaiutipierluigi useofthedecisionregretscaleinnonclinicalcontexts
AT valentegiuseppe useofthedecisionregretscaleinnonclinicalcontexts
AT manconestefania useofthedecisionregretscaleinnonclinicalcontexts
AT gramboneangela useofthedecisionregretscaleinnonclinicalcontexts
AT chiricoandrea useofthedecisionregretscaleinnonclinicalcontexts
AT lucidifabio useofthedecisionregretscaleinnonclinicalcontexts